The society is controlled by an assortment of ethical principles. Furthermore, different cultures have varied perception that determines the adherence to certain ethical concerns. This paper presents ethical issues focusing on business corruption in the American and Chinese culture. It examines these two cultures to determine how business corruption persists. Additionally, it identifies the ethics necessary for evaluating business corruption. Finally, it discusses the actions taken by the American and Chinese culture to curb company dishonesty.
Business Corruption in the American Culture
The practice of business corruption takes place differently in the global marketplace. Indicators of business corruption entail aspects such as bribery, cronyism, and partiality (Biegelman & Biegelman, 2010). Furthermore, corruption takes place secretly thus giving other persons undue advantage basing on tender awards, favorable policies, and improved services. In US, most established firms forbid business corruption practices. The American firms enhance transparency while undertaking their business (Gitlow, 2005).
American firms note that nepotism derails business endeavors by appointing lazy and unskilled family member to key roles. American culture supports the recruitment of highly skilled persons that possess the acumen that brings massive value within the business setting.
Furthermore, practices of bribery are few in the American culture because they are punishable by law (Gitlow, 2005). Companies engage in clean and honest dealings because of accountability requirements. Additionally, the most competent companies and individuals usually gain the opportunity for contract awards.
Business Corruption in the Chinese Culture
Business corruption in the Chinese culture is enhanced through practices that escalate relationship building between company owners and their family connections. Chinese firms practices insinuate that recruiting family members to perform key roles when they possess inadequate qualifications is normal (Biegelman & Biegelman, 2010).
Chinese culture promotes business dynasty that allows firms to involve their children in their firm’s operations regardless of their incompetency. Furthermore, Chinese firms also recruit non-family members as employees when they are happy with nepotism.
In the Chinese culture, family faithfulness remains supreme (Biegelman & Biegelman, 2010). This enables owners to assign their off springs duty because they are aware of their strengths and skills.
Chinese culture suggests that nepotism occurs when people fail to employ their relatives in business. Similarly, cronyism as a form of business corruption practiced in the Chinese culture allows contract awards to relatives and longtime friends than lowest bidders (Biegelman & Biegelman, 2010). Firms have belief in such people’s ability to offer the desired services.
Ethics Necessary for Evaluating Business Corruption
Appraising business corruption occurs through laws and other policy guidelines. There are designed to identify and appraise certain aspects of corruption in business dealings. Laws stipulate that offering gifts in exchange of certain favors during business dealings lead to corruption (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2010).
This enhances people’s awareness basing on giveaways from other businesses. Firms that offer gifts or accept giveaways will have such deliveries analyzed based on the descriptions within the guidelines. This determines whether they amount to corruption (Ferrell et al., 2010).
Justice system also helps in evaluating corruption within the business marketplace. Certain dealings by companies certainly amount to corruption. Complaints forwarded by workforce to courts basing on corrupt conducts of their employers can be analyzed using judicial means to reveal the nature of corruption (Ferrell et al., 2010).
Furthermore, transparency guidelines also find use in evaluating corruption because it analyzes dealings based on many aspects. Evaluation of corruption would also occur by analyzing the conduct of firms in handling business deals against the moral guidelines that people need to preserve (Ferrell et al., 2010). This enables evaluators to determine whether business dealings flouted regulatory codes that govern business owners.
Actions Undertaken by American and Chinese Culture Business Corruption
In both cultures, the enactment of anti corruption legislations significantly reduces corruption. The legislations offer equal opportunities for diverse businesses that undertake their operations within the Chinese and American territories. Furthermore, such regulations also cover foreign firms that may advance fraudulent dealings in these counties (Olsen, 2010).
Enacted laws prohibit corruption acts including bribery, unlawful acceptance of giveaways, and partiality in business activities. The laws encourage transparency and responsibility among business firms.
The nations also undertake to develop business norms that hinder corruption among practitioners (Olsen, 2010). These norms present the guidelines for undertaking business dealings without necessarily advancing corruption. The development of additional initiatives also helps in identifying and pushing corrupt practices within the business marketplace.
In summary, different cultures have varying views basing on specific ethical issues. Business corruption practices take place in the American and Chinese civilizations differently. The practices that indicate business dishonesty include nepotism, partiality, and cronyism among others.
In the American culture, business corruption takes place at low levels because of stability in the business institutions. However, American firms advance business corruption through minimal aspects of bribery, favoritism, and partiality. Chinese firms also advance business corruption through unfair practices that build family relationships in businesses. Laws and justice system are instrumental in evaluating corruption while decrees address the vice.
Biegelman, M., & Biegelman, D. (2010). Overview of the foreign corrupt practices act. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2010). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Gitlow, A. (2005). Corruption in corporate America: Who is responsible? Who will protect the public interest?. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Olsen, W. (2010). The anti-corruption handbook: How to protect your business in the global marketplace. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.