Court System vs. the United States Constitution Dissertation

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda
Updated: Jan 23rd, 2024

When the time came to organize the first judicial branch, much of the argument in Congress revolved around the establishment of subordinate federal courts and faith in the present municipal courts to practice state jurisdiction. The supporters of a centralized government believed that incorporating a countrywide structure consisting of federal courts was a crucial necessity for an effective administration (Owens & Wedeking, 2011). The remaining Congress affiliates assumed that justice could mostly be found in the courts that were inherent in local communities because the affiliates remembered the unpleasant experience under British governance. There were also groups of individuals who did not trust centralized governments. These people sought to allow state courts the right to review all the cases, including federal law.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Dissertation on Court System vs. the United States Constitution
808 writers online

The Controversy

Major Elements

The first major element of the controversy is the fact that Congress aimed to protect idiosyncratic legal peculiarities of the state. This meant that the judicial districts were matched to the state borders and supported the exploitation of the particular state’s legislation for the majority of court proceedings in the area. The same approach was used for the selection of federal juries. Another major element was the assignment of circuit-riding duties. For Supreme Court judges, this was probably the most significant means of defense of the local legal values. These duties guaranteed that the judiciaries on the nation’s main court would interact with the residents of the respective area. The judiciaries were required to study the cases more thoroughly at the point where cases fell under the jurisdiction of the federal court (Bentley, 2007). The Judiciary Act also did not mind the local positioning of the subordinate courts and made the judges live in the region where they served.

Varying Viewpoints

The scope of federal jurisdiction grew together with the expansion of the court system and the growing nation of the US. Due to this, a new jurisdiction came in. It addressed the issues of exclusive rights, land rights, slave trade, and impoverishment. The view at the jurisdiction changed over time because existing statutes were constantly updated in order to cover the majority of the federal crimes. In 1842, Congress was able to cover all the federal crimes except those where the individuals were bound by the death penalty (Baker, 2003). It is worth noting that the authority of the federal courts was also one of the key issues of political debates.

Ultimate Outcome

The Reconstruction era and post-Civil War period directed the extensive transformations of federal jurisdiction. In 1875, Congress allowed the district courts of the United States to review all the cases that were connected to the Constitution and federal regulations (Smith, 2008). This resulted in a number of measures intended to extend the limits of the federal courts and restrain the influence of state courts. This act also allowed the parties to take the case to a federal court instead of a state court. The parties could also address a federal court if they were from two different states.

Conclusion

The judiciary act of 1789 founded a federal court structure with extensive control. If the current system were not established by the Founding Fathers, the act would not play a noteworthy part in the development of state courts. Moreover, the multiplicity of legal institutions throughout the United States would not be either failsafe or documented in the resident federal courts.

References

Baker, N. (2003). National security versus civil liberties. , 33(3), 547-567. Web.

Bentley, C. (2007). Constrained by the liberal tradition: Why the Supreme Court has not found positive rights in the American Constitution. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007 (6), 1721-1765. Web.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

Owens, R. J., & Wedeking, J. P. (2011). Justices and legal clarity: Analyzing the complexity of U.S. Supreme Court opinions. Law & Society Review, 45(4), 1027-1061. Web.

Smith, C. A. (2008). Credible commitments and the early American Supreme Court. Law & Society Review, 42(1), 75-110. Web.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Court System vs. the United States Constitution written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2024, January 23). Court System vs. the United States Constitution. https://ivypanda.com/essays/court-system-vs-the-united-states-constitution/

Work Cited

"Court System vs. the United States Constitution." IvyPanda, 23 Jan. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/court-system-vs-the-united-states-constitution/.

References

IvyPanda. (2024) 'Court System vs. the United States Constitution'. 23 January.

References

IvyPanda. 2024. "Court System vs. the United States Constitution." January 23, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/court-system-vs-the-united-states-constitution/.

1. IvyPanda. "Court System vs. the United States Constitution." January 23, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/court-system-vs-the-united-states-constitution/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Court System vs. the United States Constitution." January 23, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/court-system-vs-the-united-states-constitution/.

Powered by CiteTotal, easy citation creator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1