Comparison of well-to-do and financially deprived families
Wealth distribution affects the relationships between family members, as well as their interactions with other members of the society (Cohen 117). A family of one of my school friend can be classified as the middle class one, perhaps, being in the upper percentile of the specified group (Cohen 124). The family has two children, including my friend and his older sister. The parents work as a lawyer in a private company and a chief financial officer in a large organization. Their children went to a public school to enroll in a college afterward, and they own a house and two cars.
We will write a custom Essay on Family Welfare and Divorce Policies specifically for you
301 certified writers online
Compared to the family described above, the one to which another friend of mine belongs is on the other side of the wealth distribution scale. The specified family can be regarded as the lower class one (Cohen 125). There are three children in the family, including my friend, his younger brother, and his elder sister. College is not an option for either of them due to the inability to take a student loan. The family rents a flat in a socially and economically unstable neighborhood.
The parenting practices are also quite different in each case. The single mother in the low-class family cares for her children, yet she has to work two jobs to support them and thus does not have much time to spend with them. Although the parents from the first family are also very busy, the children receive enough attention and have regular family time in the evening. As a result, the levels of concerted cultivation are much higher in the first family.
The social capital is also different in both cases, each family communicating primarily with the people of their class (Cohen 137). Therefore, while the children from both families have enough potential in terms of their skill sets, the life chances of the middle-class family are much higher than the ones of the children from the low-class family. The phenomenon described above corresponds directly to the expectations that the textbook discussion has set.
Marriage culture and divorce policies
The persistent nature of disposability as it pertains to the modern society might seem as entirely negative, yet there are nuances to the specified discussion. On the one hand, the threat of relationships and marriage being viewed as something insignificant due to loose divorce policies may become rather high. On the other hand, by making divorce policies more rigid, one may create the environment in which the levels of well-being will drop, and the rates of family violence will increase (Cohen 12). Particularly, people may feel desperate and even depressed after realizing that they made a choice that cannot be reversed and will affect them until the end of their life, hence the increased aggression.
It seems that the general problem of the specified discussion stems from the poor cause-and-effect connection between the factors under analysis. Current policies allow people to get married and divorce easier than the previous regulations did, yet these regulations do not force people to separate. The choice to separate hinges on the relationships within a family, economic issues, financial concerns, and a range of other factors that affect people’s relationships (Cohen 26). Making divorce harder to obtain will not absolve people from making mistakes when choosing to get married; instead, it will only make their life miserable if their marriage turns out to be unsustainable.
Making it harder to get married will not resolve the problem since it will fail to shift the focus to what is important – a careful analysis of essential issues that a married couple will have to confront at some point. Therefore, it is recommended to scrutinize the social and cultural factors that affect people’s marriage-related choices. As a result, a married couple will avoid a range of unexpected problems that will affect their relationships and may ultimately destroy their marriage. The specified change can occur once government- or community-sponsored marriage courses are provided for couples to educate themselves and learn to handle social, economic, and emotional issues together (Cohen 13). Thus, a positive outcome can be expected.
Cohen, Philip N. The Family Diversity, Inequality, and Social Change. 2nd ed., Norton, 2018.