Overview and Objectives
The operation under analysis pursued several key objectives. The main goal of Operation Audrey was to enhance the levels of state security and minimize the possibility of an attack from the SEMAJA. The second objective was to inspect the opportunities for recruiting Khorosani as the undercover agent who could assist the state in fighting against SEMAJA. Finally, the third goal of the operation involved the actual recruitment process and the creation of the connection between the organization and Khorasan for further management of essential information about SEMAJA.
The described objectives are essential to enhancing the levels of state security since the SEMAJA currently poses a consistent threat. It should be borne in mind that the operation in question implies multiple risks that need to be addressed to reduce the probability of a failure 1,2,3. Specifically, the introduction of information management tools that will reduce the risks of data leakage and, thus, prevent the instance of mismanaging the project will be required. Securing the location DIAMOND should be the priority currently given its further use as a safe house.
Rationale
Although the operation will require taking significant risks, it is worth performing since it is expected to improve the levels of international security extensively. Because of the increase in the political tension within the target region, it is important to control the cases that may set the precedent for a long-lasting military confrontation. The management of the threat associated with SEMAJA, in turn, is expected to create an additional environment for relieving the tension. Once the agent that has been causing an increase in the levels of threat and inciting violence on the global political arena loses a vast amount of their power, the chances for establishing a peaceful dialogue will emerge 7,8.
As a result, the described operation will minimize the probability of a military resurgence and the resulting damage to innocent citizens vastly 9,10. In addition, with the help of an agent in place in the context of the Oman environment, Europol will be aware of the key data regarding the changes in the location of SEMAJA and its intentions. Thus, the subsequent improvement in the awareness and readiness levels will lead to a better risk management approach and enhance preparedness.
Bibliography
Atelhe, George Atelhe, J. A. Adams, and S. B. Abunimye. “Overview of Security Sector Reforms and the Transformation of the Nigerian’s Security Agencies.” American International Journal of Social Science 5, no. 3 (2016): pp. 151-158.
Byman, Daniel, and Sara Bjerg Moller. “The United States and the Middle East: Interests, Risks, and Costs.” Web.
Davies, Lynn. “Security, Extremism and Education: Safeguarding or Surveillance?” British Journal of Educational Studies 64, no. 1 (2016): pp. 1-19.
Gerringer, Arthur E., and Josh Bart. “Law Enforcement Intelligence.” Journal of US Intelligence Studies 21, no. 1 (2015): pp. 75-77.
Tawil-Souri, Helga. “Surveillance Sublime: The Security State.” Jerusalem Quarterly 68, no. 1 (2016): pp. 57-58.
Kilroy, Richard J. “No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Surveillance state.” Journal of Strategic Security 1, no. 1 (2016): 99-102.
Landon-Murray, Michael. “Big Data and Intelligence: Applications, Human Capital, and Education.” Journal of Strategic Security 9, no. 2 (2016): pp. 92-121.
Nagra, Baljt, and Paula Maurutto. “Crossing Borders and Managing Racialized Identities: Experiences of Security and Surveillance Among Young Canadian Muslims.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 41, no. 2 (2016): pp. 165-194.
Saeh, Ibrahim, M.W. Mustafa and Nasir A. Al-geelani. “New Classifier Design for Static Security Evaluation Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.” International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering 6, no. 2 (2016): pp. 1-8.
Yeung, Chung Yin Joanie. “On the Benefits and Dangers of International Intelligence Liaison.” Web.