Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Family is the central concept for the existence of the society of human beings, and father is the dominant figure in this concept. Father, as the breadwinner and major pillar of every family is the character that has always been portrayed in television shows and sitcoms, especially on the television in the USA. Modern trends towards emancipation of women change the roles of fathers and their authority and make the division of the latter into several categories possible (Albada, 2000). Drawing from this, there is a need to trace the change of social attitudes towards television fathers and divide them into several major groups according to their qualities and rates of influence upon families, as well as according to their being close to real-life fathers or pure fiction characters.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis
808 writers online

To start with, all current television fathers can be divided into two groups according to their closeness to the real-life situations. Some of them, like for example Martin Crane or Jim Anderson, are reflections of the images of fathers that can be often observed in real life. They display no absolute confidence in their actions and thoughts, they are often at a loss about what should be done in this or that situation, and they rely much on the help of their wives. Not surprisingly, images of television mothers acquire more attention and become prominent in the today’s sitcoms and television family shows (Scharrer, 2001). Another group of fathers is the one in which fathers are absolutely sure in their authority in the family and can help their family members undoubtedly in every difficult situation in life regardless of what it may be. Such fathers as Mike Brady, Howard Cunningham or Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable, are able to solve any problem their children can come across. Although they are strict and resort to punishing children and yelling at them, they are nevertheless reverend and reliable people around whom the families are built (Scharrer, 2001).

Another grouping of television fathers can be carried out in accordance with their family position. In other words, fathers can be divided into single fathers and those who have complete families and help of wives in their lives. According to this criterion, fathers are either heroes who manage to raise their children on their own, and at the same time work a lot and take time for their kids. These fathers, like Andy Tailor and Ben Cartwright, are the embodiments of the harsh reality where people have to combine many spheres of activity in order to be successful. They are able to work hard to feed their children, but at the same time teach them the basics of good manners, morals and life values (Scharrer, 2001). On the other hand, such fathers as Ward Cleaver and Eric Camden have complete families and are happy about this fact. These fathers are viewed as the role models of manly behavior and confidence even in the hardest situations in life. They can advice their children in dating, education, career choices, and support wives in hardships of life (Bryant, 2001).

Finally, the major classification of television fathers is carried out in respect of their portrayal. This means that some fathers are authoritative, while others are viewed as clowns and subjects for jokes and laughs. The modern trends of social development attribute more prominence to women in families, and due to this, authoritative fathers are seldom observed on today’s TV. The brightest examples of them are Danny Thomas, Judge Hardy and many others who are respected by their families and lead them in the right directions as they see them (Albada, 2000). On then contrary, the most popular image of the television father nowadays is a dunce unable of anything and fitting for jokes and laughing at him. Television tends to entertain people more at all costs and the image of father has become one of the means to do it. Such fathers like Willey Tanner from the sitcom Alf, or Mr. Geller from the series Friends, are bright example of the fathers whose authority is doubted and laughed at not to say disrespected. These characters are fictional of course, but their examples reflect the reality of today. Emancipation of women and opportunities to combine family and successful career has made it difficult for fathers of families to be the only breadwinners. As their authority was built on this being exclusive supporter of family, nowadays it is ruined. This fact leaves much to think about the future of the society in which traditional roles have changed (Bryant, 2001).

However, there is the opposite opinion in the society in respect of television fathers, their categorization and importance for future development of the society. According to this opinion, the television fathers discussed above have absolutely no relation to real-life fathers and situations they can come across. That is why, it is unnecessary to divide television fathers in groups and look for reasons of such divisions. But it is evident that such a point of view is not relevant in the modern society. Such reflections of the social changes as culture and television do not create stories and images that are completely separated from the reality. Due to this, it is necessary to follow the changes that accompany the images of television fathers in order to be aware of the most updated trends in public opinions about family and father as its head (Scharrer, 2001).

To conclude, it is necessary to say that division of television fathers into categories discussed above is vital for understanding the social changes of today. Modern trends towards emancipation of women change the roles of fathers and their authority and make such division of the latter into several categories possible. Thus, the changes in culture are reflections of major social processes among human beings. Television fathers as embodiments of major values reflect the reorganization of social life that takes place nowadays and are the major indicators of the shift of roles of men and women in the modern society.

Works Cited

Albada, Kelly Fudge. “The Public and Private Dialogue About the American Family on Television.” Journal of Communication 50.4 (2000): 79-110.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

Bryant, Jennings, and J. Alison Bryant, eds. Television and the American Family. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.

Scharrer, Erica. “From Wise to Foolish: The Portrayal of the Sitcom Father, 1950s-1990s.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 45.1 (2001): 23.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, October 3). Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis. https://ivypanda.com/essays/grouping-and-dividing-social-analysis/

Work Cited

"Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis." IvyPanda, 3 Oct. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/grouping-and-dividing-social-analysis/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis'. 3 October.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis." October 3, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/grouping-and-dividing-social-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda. "Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis." October 3, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/grouping-and-dividing-social-analysis/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Grouping and Dividing: Social Analysis." October 3, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/grouping-and-dividing-social-analysis/.

Powered by CiteTotal, free reference maker
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1