The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership
Leadership is an act of giving guidelines to a group of people towards achieving a specific goal over a certain period. According to Maxwell (2007, p.16) leadership is universal meaning that headship is governed by some inert laws. These laws are the basis of leadership and characterized by the following: 1) individuals or leaders can learn these laws; 2) there are consequences alongside these laws, and 3) they can stand unaided because they are universal.
We will write a custom Case Study on Leadership and Management: Maxwell and Kerzner Views specifically for you
301 certified writers online
According to Maxwell (2007, p.17), there are 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership that govern headship. The three most important are: the law of connection, the law of solid ground, and the law of sacrifice. These three laws reflect on the character of the leaders to head the society.
The law of connection pinpoints that leaders should learn how to connect with the people they are intending to head. A leader needs to understand the kind of people he wants to lead and adjust accordingly for easy communication. The leader must first build personal connections with the people emotionally by interacting with them without any discrimination. Personal connection makes it easy for the leader to enter into society.
Leaders are responsible for initiating communication because people are interested to know how he/she cares for their specific needs. People in society must feel that their leader has become part and parcel of their lives. As it is seen, building relationships with people is essential for leadership, and it is the first step for their success within society (Maxwell, 2007, P.113).
The law of sacrifice emphasizes the fact that leaders need to sacrifice themselves to better people’s conditions. In other words, it means they have to put one’s selfishness aside and become selfless. The leader should not focus on what people can do for them or what they will gain from people but what they can personally do for the people. The law of sacrifice is a process during which the leaders are to work towards eliminating any selfishness.
The leaders need to realize that once they have climbed the career ladder, their rights are minimized, but the responsibilities have risen because people have expectations of them to transform the society into a better place to live in (Maxwell, 2007, P.219).
The law of solid ground highlights that trust must be gained because it is the basis of leadership. The character of the leader, the way he presents himself or herself within the community, determines whether people can trust him/her or not. There is no shortcut in gaining trust but by portraying a desirable character in the eyes of society. It is hard for people to follow an individual whom they do not trust (Maxwell, 2007, P.61).
Ethics are guidelines that govern the conduct of individuals in society on what is right or wrong. Ethics defines what kind of moral behavior is acceptable in some particular society. Therefore, the law of sacrifice, connection, and respect reflect the ethics of leadership because when a leader sacrifices himself or herself for the people, it signifies he/she cares for the society and willing to assist the people. When the law of connection is applied, then people interact with him/her without fear, and they can lend a hand to a leader to achieve common goals.
Questions and Answers to problems raised on Project management by Kerzner
Two contractors decide to enter into a joint venture on a project. What difficulties can occur if the contractors have decided, on who does what work, but changes may take place if problems occur? What happens if one contractor has higher salary levels and overhead rates?
The two contractors may face challenges controlling work meaning, that the laborers may lose trust and respect for the project. They may also face financial challenges, in case of additional purchase of items or hiring more workforces. The one with higher salary levels and overhead rate may take advantage of the low earning contractor by manipulating the project for his/her betterment.
During initial pricing activities, one of the functional managers discovers that the work breakdown structure requires costing data at a level that is not normally made and will undoubtedly incur an additional cost. How should you, as a program manager, respond to this situation? What are your alternatives?
There will be a need to analyze the additional cost, and if there are any available resources, it might help in cutting down the additional cost. The items that have not yet been purchased and are not necessary may be cut off to save additional money and enlarge on the budget. The company might decide to reduce the number of workers to meet the additional cost. It can also decide to stick to the initial budget and do with what they have budgeted for the project.
Should a project manager be appointed in the bidding stage of a project? If so, what authority should he have, and who is responsible for winning the contract?
The project manager should not be appointed at the bidding stage of the project because of verifying their qualification, experience, and commitment to their work. The person in charge of winning the contract should be the owner of the project because they know exactly what they want and what kind of project manager they need to run the project. Therefore, the appointment should be done, by the owner and his/her board members before the project.
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.
Maxwell, J. C. (2007). The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership: Workbook : follow them and people will follow you. Nashville, Tenn: Thomas Nelson.