Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins? Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Outline the differences between the AFL-CIO’s organizing committee (AWOC) and Chavez’s work in Oxnard and then with the FWA, which GANZ believes explains why AWOC won a strike but couldn’t succeed at organizing a union.

In his work, Chavez was oriented to the long-term goals when AWOC stressed the short-term goals and immediate results. The basic elements of the strategies used by Chavez and AWOC were similar and included such points as the role of experience, social networks, and tactical repertoires. However, the differences are more significant. The strategic differences and important aspects accentuated by Chavez are the focus on identity, accountability, deliberation, and resources. According to Ganz, these elements form the strategic capacity (Ganz, 2009).

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins?
808 writers online

Throughout this strike, the NFWA does not employ conventional strike strategy and tactics. Comment on any piece of their strategy or specific tactic that you found interesting

One of the most effective components of Chavez’s strategy is his focus on the effective cooperation between different levels of the organization instead of concentration on the strict hierarchy in an organization. This approach is necessary to see the complete situation, and it influences the decision-making process when the result depends on the vision of the workers. Thus, the highly centralized structure was changed with a flexible organization to be open to effective discussions. The principle of deliberation in Chavez’s strategy is correlated with this specific feature of the organization. The principle of deliberation affects the development of the strategy at all stages.

Chavez calls his leadership team to discuss NFWA’s options since their strategy did not plan on a strike for years. They of course decided to support the strikers and then agree that they would risk a strike if the workers agreed to 3 conditions. What were these conditions, and what else did the leadership team want to see to believe that they could manage a strike? What do you think of the leadership team’s decision making process?

The actions of the leadership team depended on the realization of requests for increasing the workers’ wages as a result of the Schenley contract. The question of job security was also discussed. The decision-making process was based on the diversity of the organization’s leadership team in which the opinions of every one were important. The focus was made on the exchange of information and increase of motivation.

Do you have the necessary resources to strike, to build a union, a basic strategic question?

Chavez was not inclined to receive financial or governmental support because of his worries about the freedom of his further actions. Thus, receiving any kind of support, Chavez can become obliged to play according to the rules of a sponsor or authority. In this situation, Chavez is not ready to report for all his actions and plans to the governmental or financial organizations. As a result, Chavez does not accentuate different conditions and financial resources for strikers and any other workers. This approach can be discussed as effective to achieve the planned freedom in actions.

Describe the different election campaign approaches the Teamsters and the Farm Workers Union used.

The Farm Workers Union used the same approach to the election campaign as to the development and building of the organization and union. The accents were made on the slow but stable and predictable, moving forth with emphasizing and setting the realistic goals. The Teamsters followed a rather aggressive approach, manipulating the workers’ intentions. From this point, Chavez continued to follow this traditional strategy basing on his leadership, cooperation, deliberation, and accountability. It is also important to note that Chavez developed his union structure basing on the mentioned principles when the Teamsters focused on the centralized and strictly authoritative structure.

Please comment on Chavez and his team’s leadership style

Chavez’s leadership style can be characterized as based on the principles of relying on the leader’s vision, effective cooperation within the team, personal motivation, commitment, involvement of the interests of all the participants, accountability, and the creative approach to developing and implementing strategies. Furthermore, Chavez paid much attention to the social structure as the influential factor for developing the strategy and accentuating the leadership. The next point is the openness to the workers’ participation in the decision-making process as a result of exchanging opinions.

After reading Ganz’s analysis, what lesson do you walk away with concerning the demise of the UFW?

The decline of the UFW depends on many factors, including the changes in the workers’ conditions and specifics of Chavez’s leadership. It is possible to pay attention to the fact that orientation to the strictest centralization of the union and the whole organization based on the key principles followed by Chavez could be effective for the further development of the union. Despite the fact Chavez’s strategy met the interests of both the workers and the leaders of the union, the management was not enough to develop the union into a powerful organization depending on the used structure.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

What one aspect of leadership development, or structure, might you want to try implementing in your organization?

I am inclined to focus on the specifics of relying on the leadership team with references to the open negotiations and discussions as one of the approaches to the decision-making process. It is essential to build relations within the organization according to the principles of accountability and deliberation along with providing the possibilities to share ideas at all levels of the structure to control the situation and choose the most appropriate solution. Moreover, effective leadership is based on an effective structure.

Did Ganz prove his thesis that David (UFW) sometimes wins because of his (their) strategic capacity?

It is possible to state that Ganz proved his thesis about the role of strategic capacity by referring to the notions of personal motivation, commitment, cooperation, and accountability. According to Ganz, strategic capacity depends on the ability to use the information effectively to develop the strategy which is the most successful under definite conditions (Ganz, 2009). Thus, success depends on the usage of the most effective strategy based on strategic capacity. Ganz states that leadership approaches can be discussed as effective when the idea of the strategic capacity, which is appropriate for certain people, time, and circumstances is used (Ganz, 2009).

Reference

Ganz, M. (2009). Why David sometimes wins: Leadership, organization, and strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins? written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, March 23). Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins? https://ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-issues-why-david-sometimes-wins/

Work Cited

"Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins?" IvyPanda, 23 Mar. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-issues-why-david-sometimes-wins/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins'. 23 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins?" March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-issues-why-david-sometimes-wins/.

1. IvyPanda. "Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins?" March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-issues-why-david-sometimes-wins/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Leadership Issues: Why David Sometimes Wins?" March 23, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/leadership-issues-why-david-sometimes-wins/.

Powered by CiteTotal, automatic citation generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1