Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging Essay (Article Review)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

This article was written by Walter Briec, Kristiaan Kerstens, and Octave Jokung presents a new efficiency measurement model for the static portfolio selection. The authors argue that the so-called parametric approach, which determines utility only by mean and variance of portfolio returns, is effective only in those cases when portfolio decisions are taken frequently or even continuously (Briec, Kerstens, & Jokung, 2007, p 136). Yet, it is no longer suitable when the decisions are limited in terms of time and rebalancing. Furthermore, the scholars point out that mean and variance are not the only criteria according to which one can measure the effectiveness of a portfolio. In particular, they focus on skewness since portfolio returns are not usually distributed normally. Moreover, investors prefer positive skewness because it diminishes the probability of large negative returns (2007, p 135). The model is three-dimensional since it takes into account three different parameters mean, variance and skewness (MVS). Their measurement approach relies on the shortage function which enables the investor to differentiate between allocative efficiency and portfolio efficiency. Additionally, this model takes into consideration other factors that affect the value of a portfolio, namely shadow prices and risk aversion necessity (2007, p 144). Briec, Kristiaan Kerstens, and Octave Jokung provide empirical evidence in support of their approach. Their findings indicate that optimal MVS portfolios have higher weights, especially in comparison with MV (mean-variance) portfolios. Nonetheless, the writers admit that at this point there is no optimal solution for MVS utility function. According to them, one has to develop a computational procedure for the hyper-shortage function in order to resolve this problem (2007, p 145). The scholars believe that mean-variance-skewness space necessitates more advanced computational models and currently they are lacking. Overall, this article throws light on a very important question in financial science, especially optimal portfolio diversification.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Article Review on Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging
808 writers online

Reference

Briec W., Kerstens K. & Jokung O., 2007. Mean Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging: A General Shortage Function and Dual Approach. Management Science, 53(1), 149-135.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 7). Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mean-variance-skewness-portfolio-performance-gauging-article-analysis/

Work Cited

"Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging." IvyPanda, 7 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/mean-variance-skewness-portfolio-performance-gauging-article-analysis/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging'. 7 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mean-variance-skewness-portfolio-performance-gauging-article-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda. "Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mean-variance-skewness-portfolio-performance-gauging-article-analysis/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Mean-Variance Skewness Portfolio Performance Gauging." June 7, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/mean-variance-skewness-portfolio-performance-gauging-article-analysis/.

Powered by CiteTotal, online essay referencing tool
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1