The fact that democracy is a serious economic venture is unquestionable due to the numerous political movements and elections campaigns that require significant financial resources. Hence, there is an evident connection between money and politics, leading to the process of democratization. In particular, although the economic influence on democracy formation is tangible, its still derives from the competition among the political parties striving to conquer the majority of voices and expand their political influences. Hence, the development of the political systems invites more active voters who contribute to the development of the democratic principles. Therefore, the political form of corruption seems to be a more powerful instrument of democratic development because it produces more influence on the voting population and attracts more resources.
We will write a custom Critical Writing on Political Corruption as a Trigger of Democracy specifically for you
301 certified writers online
The formation of the political forces affects the competition between voters. According to Burnell and Ware (2007), the idea of corruption is closely associated with the concept of dysfunctionality and decentralization. Therefore, the range of existing political parties serves as a driving force for developing democratic systems. More importantly, “the appearance of corruption, and attitudes taken towards it, clearly has an important bearing on the condition of democracy and democratic prospects” (Burnell and Ware, 2007, p. 10). Therefore, the democratic influence on political power is closely associated with the development of the political struggle between the parties striving to possess power of the majority.
Despite the above-presented arguments, the greatest risks to political system and democratizations may not consist in corrupted finance. Rather, the effectiveness of political competition can be depreciated due to the immense financial resources involved in development of new political ideologies attracting more supporters and igniting new democratic paradigms. Therefore, the economic form of corruption is considered as the implication of the political actions. Burnell and Ware (2007) state, “different approaches to political finance have been studies quite intensively…as devices to counter the political inequalities that can flow from substantial private economic discrepancies” (p. 9). In this respect, there is a strong connection between political and economic dimensions influencing the development of democracy.
The political corruption can also be considered as a resonator of public activity because the population becomes more concerned with democratic principles. In particular, the voters create a new platform for political activities and direct the democratic forces to organizing new political parties (Burnell and Ware, 2007). Therefore, there are substantial reasons for introducing the political form of political corruption for promoting democracy. Although the monetary practices are associated with funding political parties, the political corruption still focuses on accumulating more activists who are ready to contribute to the development of political system.
In conclusion, the political form of corruption is more powerful for advancing democratic principles because it contributes to the political competition and greater public awareness, although some of the democratic rules are not consistent with the actual ideology of equality and freedom. Nevertheless, the political parties are encouraged to finance their activities through encouraging more voters to support their political paradigms. Further, the development of new political forces leads to decentralization of political opinion, as well as to public resonance due to the greater incentives to take an active part in social and political spheres of life. Such a perspective, therefore, presents economic corruption as an implication for the political activities, as well as excludes the development of political funding as the priority for democratic development.
Burnell, P. J., & Ware, A. (2007). Funding Democratization. US: Transaction Publishers.