“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan Essay (Article Review)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Article Summary

This article describes unexpected resonance connected with the policy of Facebook about personal data. Dina Srinivasan, a former digital advertising executive, published her article in which she stated that “Facebook harmed consumers by charging them ever-increasing amounts of personal data to use its platform” (Horwitz, 2019, para. 3). She was extremely surprised to know that her work attracted highly substantial attention as she did not have a law license or any institutional affiliation. Nevertheless, Dina Srinivasan was invited to present her article at several antitrust conferences. The representatives of Facebook denied Srinivasan’s claims that “the company tracks its users in an aggressive or unique fashion” (Horwitz, 2019, para. 8). However, the emerged social resonance demonstrated the necessity of the antitrust law’s review.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Article Review on “She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan
808 writers online

Economic Concept

The article refers to the protection of personal data that may be inappropriately used by large social networks against the will of their users. Facebook previously confirmed that “it would track users via the login and like buttons embedded in millions of news sites, online retailers and games” for effective targeting and advertising (Horwitz, 2019, para. 24). In fact, a prevalent number of users rejected being tracked even though Facebook offers its services free of charge. That is why Srinivasan’s article was positively evaluated by the public and initiated the consideration related to antitrust law.

Opinion

From a personal perspective, the practice of the companies’ use of people’s private information without their agreement is unethical and illegal. Customers do not know who may use their data and for what reason. In order to minimize the clients’ risks of being harmed, Facebook and other large multinational retail companies and social networks should change their policies and certain business practices to protect personal data.

Reference

Horwitz, J. (2019). She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly. To Her Surprise, People Listened. The Wall Street Journal. Web.

Print
Need an custom research paper on “She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 10). “She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan. https://ivypanda.com/essays/she-argued-facebook-is-a-monopoly-by-dina-srinivasan/

Work Cited

"“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan." IvyPanda, 10 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/she-argued-facebook-is-a-monopoly-by-dina-srinivasan/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) '“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan'. 10 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan." June 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/she-argued-facebook-is-a-monopoly-by-dina-srinivasan/.

1. IvyPanda. "“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan." June 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/she-argued-facebook-is-a-monopoly-by-dina-srinivasan/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "“She Argued Facebook Is a Monopoly” by Dina Srinivasan." June 10, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/she-argued-facebook-is-a-monopoly-by-dina-srinivasan/.

Powered by CiteTotal, essay citation generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1