Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research Essay

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Statistical Significance

Both statistical significance and clinical importance are essential in healthcare research, but they have different meanings and applications. As such, scholars have to know how they are similar or different when conducting investigations on the usefulness of a specific treatment. According to Abbott (2017), any hypothesis test result that has a p below 0.05 should be considered statistically significant. The value can be lowered if necessary, with 0.01 being a popular choice in medicine due to its stringent requirements. However, statistical significance alone is not sufficient to confirm the efficacy of a treatment, though it is required.

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Essay on Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research
808 writers online

Clinical Importance

Clinical importance is also necessary to mark the results of the study as definitive on whether the new treatment warrants implementation. According to Newman, Takei, Klokkevold, and Carranza (2019), it is classified depending on the tangibility and size of the effect. Tangible results and significant effects are more clinically important than their opposites. As such, according to Mackridge and Rowe (2018), it is possible for a result to be statistically but not clinically significant and vice versa. Researchers should pay attention to both criteria when determining whether the results are relevant.

Conclusion

Statistical significance and clinical importance are essential statistics for clinical research, but they share no other similarities. The former concerns the results of the test and whether the information obtained is likely to represent the objective reality. The latter indicates whether the treatment produces sufficient positive results it warrants implementation in clinical settings if its reliability is confirmed. One characteristic does not indicate the presence of the other, and the two are not mutually exclusive. As such, researchers have to consider both independently when conducting clinical studies.

References

Abbott, M.L. (2017). Using statistics in the social and health sciences with SPSS and Excel. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Mackridge, A., & Rowe, P. (2018). A practical approach to using statistics in health research: From planning to reporting. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Newman, M.G., Takei, H., Klokkevold, P.R., & Carranza, F.A. (2019). Newman and Carranza’s clinical periodontology (13th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, July 26). Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research. https://ivypanda.com/essays/statistical-vs-clinical-relevance-of-research/

Work Cited

"Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research." IvyPanda, 26 July 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/statistical-vs-clinical-relevance-of-research/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research'. 26 July.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research." July 26, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/statistical-vs-clinical-relevance-of-research/.

1. IvyPanda. "Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research." July 26, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/statistical-vs-clinical-relevance-of-research/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Statistical vs. Clinical Relevance of Research." July 26, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/statistical-vs-clinical-relevance-of-research/.

Powered by CiteTotal, best referencing generator
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1