It is noted that Chinese people believed that traveling was too dangerous and it was better to stay home to be safe (Osnos par. 18). However, it is clear that Chinese people have traveled for centuries, and modern Chinese travelers are open to new experiences and are eager to learn more about other cultures. Mike Pugh sees travel as a way to learn more about the world around him (“About Mike Pugh” par. 1). The traveler claims that he comes from the family of travelers who were not afraid of new experiences and traveling to other countries.
We will write a custom Essay on Travel for Chinese People specifically for you
301 certified writers online
The two passages contain a similar idea that traveling makes people more open-minded and helps them learn about the world around them and themselves and their place in this world. Thus, Mike Pugh states that it is the best way to “learn about people and nature and your place in the world” (“About Mike Pugh” par. 1). Osnos also notes that modern Chinese people want to experience things rather than read about them or watch TV programs, so “Chinese literature lovers” want “to glimpse” at things they were reading about (par. 21).
They want to experience the same (or maybe different) feelings, and they want to listen to themselves and to understand their feelings. Another similarity between the two passages is that both authors refer to historical facts to prove that people have traveled for hundreds of years. Thus, Mike Pugh tells about his ancestors who came to the New World centuries ago (“About Mike Pugh” par. 3). Osnos states that Buddhist monks came to see other lands (like India) in the name of the emperor (par. 18). This makes the texts more relevant as the authors’ ideas are supported by experiences of people who lived many years ago.
Nonetheless, the two passages differ in several ways. For example, Pugh focuses on the history of his own family, but Osnos considers the history of Chinese people’s travels in general. Thus, Pugh mentions “Great-Great-Grandfather Pugh” who sailed to New York from Liverpool (“About Mike Pugh” par. 3). At the same time, Osnos starts with mentioning travels of ancient monks and then tells the story of Chinese people who “were permitted” to travel only a few decades ago (par. 19). Another difference is the way the authors start their stories. Pugh states that he sees “travel as life’s great educator” (par. 1).
However, Osnos starts with Chinese proverbs that prove Chinese people’s fears of travel as traveling is associated with great and unnecessary risks (par. 18). Thus, Pugh starts with something positive, but Osnos starts his story with something negative. Pugh notes that he is committed to traveling and tells about this commitment. At the same time, Osnos reveals fears first but then proves that these fears are in the past and modern people are ready to travel and explore new lands and cultures. This makes Osnos’ passage stronger and more persuasive than Pugh’s passage.
On balance, it is possible to note that Osnos’ passage and Pugh’s passage are similar as they both focus on the great power and benefits of travel. Both writers address the issue similarly as they state that travel helps people learn more about the world around them and even learn more about their place in this world.
About Mike Pugh. n.d. Web.
Osnos, Evan. The Grand Tour. 2011. Web.