Quality Policy for an Airline company in accordance with the ISO9001:2008
The superiority of service and universal business of Zadar Airport Limited are the chief objective of the corporation, which depends on the evaluation of customers of the company’s services. In support of this course, the criterion for quality of service is the response the company gets from its customers.
We will write a custom Report on Zadar Airport Limited Quality Management System specifically for you
301 certified writers online
By relating the technique of analysis to customer contentment, the company keeps an eye on the work quality management scheme, with the intention of attaining permanent developments based on procedure advance management.
The Company administration will endlessly improve the effectiveness and dependable management scheme in agreement with valid a policy. For this reason, the management will provide the essential resources which principally involve the necessary guidance of employees and technical equipment. In addition to this, the administration will set up annual quality goals and monitor their realisation and observance with strategies.
Quality goals are detailed by management levels, and in agreement with that the administration and workers analytically and completely put this policy into operation. Additionally, the policy was openly announced.
For each stakeholder, at least one stakeholder need was identified and for each stakeholder’s need, at least five processes were identified (New South Wales Government, 2012). This has been presented in the table below.
|Customers||Safety and security|| |
|System users||capacity|| |
|Service providers||Efficiency|| |
|Government||Create employment|| |
The process picked is that of the employee stakeholder. Below is a table representing the inputs and outputs representing this process.
Setting of training days and training time
Evaluation of staff and grading.
Feedback from previous training
|Training programs of airport personnel||Enhanced services |
For the airline employee training process used in section 1.3, five performance parameters and five methods that can be applied to measure those performance parameters are as identified below (Kulzick 1999).
|Performance parameter||Measurement Method(s)|
|Improved service|| |
|Staff satisfaction and motivation|| |
|Enhanced safety|| |
|Positive attitude|| |
|Self development|| |
The elements (components) that are needed to implement a continuous improvement program for the organisation are as below.
Establishing a vision for continual improvement
The main role of the administration is to offer an organisational vision that holds continual development. The top manager ought to use the vision, as an important tool in the communication of the overall goals for continual development, thereby inspiring the personnel and aligning continual development actions with the goal of the organisation.
Including a cross-section of workers in the course of developing a vision has been established to increase a feeling of possession and commitment all through the organisation (Hull, 2011).
Creating the incentive for a change
The senior administration needs to raise awareness of everyone in the organisation, concerning the need for considerable change as an ingredient of achieving extensive commitment to constant development. Individuals find change extremely uncomfortable and choose to maintain things the way they are, even after they recognise that being rigid will ultimately lead to failure.
Consequently, the senior administration must inspire staff members by communicating bluntly the benefits that lively contribution in the persistent improvement programme would fetch for each department, or purpose within the organisation (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006).
Benchmarking, Auditing, Monitoring and Reviving
It is really vital to make sure that the company is heading in the right direction, and continually improving. Without the above mentioned four measures, this would be impossible to gauge. Results from bench marking, auditing, monitoring and reviewing, will help in identifying the strengths, weaknesses and gaps in the company’s undertaking, and can be used to improve procedures, processes, systems and future training.
Procedures and processes should be continually reviewed to ensure their suitability. Procedures could be updated to reflect recent changes in legislation or suggestions by external consultants.
Get your first paper with 15% OFF
Processes on the other hand, could be updated to take advantage of recent technological advances. These regular reviews and updates are likely to contribute to continuous improvement (Australian Procurement and Construction Council Inc & Department of Labour Advisory Committee, 1997).
Systems should be regularly reviewed to determine if they can be improved. Systems could be updated based on staff members’ feedback and suggestions by external consultants. Upgrading of computer systems and infrastructure could also contribute to continuous improvement by taking advantage of the latest technology (Construction Industry Forum et al., 2003).
Staff training could also be essential in ensuring that all procedures and practices are accomplished with efficiency, and that all staff members understand their job function.
All the members should have a professional development program that clearly identifies their training shortcomings, and maps out their training requirements. They should learn new skills likely to directly contribute to continuous improvement (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2006).
Creating a continual development culture could also be important. This is likely to be even more successful if it is initiated into a company that has an educational culture. In this, it is vital to realise and comprehend the background of an organisation. This will assist in identifying what requirements are to be changed to encourage continual development (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2010).
Haddow, J, Bullock, J & Coppola, P 2010, Introduction to Emergency Management, Prentice Hall, London.
Hull, J 2011, Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, Pearson, New Jersey.
Hylmö, K 2005, The Acceptance Process in Road Planning, Two Swedish Case Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Stockholm.
International Atomic Energy Agency 2006, ‘Application of the Management System for Facilities and Activities’, IAEA Safety Standards Series, no. GS-G-3.1, pp. 27-28.
Kulzick, R 1999, Stakeholder analysis for business. Web.
New South Wales Government 2012, Work Cover Authority of NSW. Web.