Introduction
All human beings have natural liberties that governments, leaders, and policymakers should take seriously. Such rights empower people to lead better lives, record meaningful social mobilities, and overcome their personal challenges. Unfortunately, freedom remains unavailable to different members of the global society, such as refugees, minority groups, immigrants, and women. These issues arise from various malpractices that are common in modern societies, such as violence, insecurity, human trafficking, and discrimination. This paper gives a detailed summary of four selected materials that focus on various humanitarian concerns. A critical analysis is presented that can guide stakeholders to take the debate to the next level and support the affected victims.
Summary of Selected Articles
The article “Egypt/Sudan: Refugees and Asylum-Seekers Face Brutal Treatment, Kidnapping for Ransom, and Human Trafficking” explains how individuals in different refugee camps face a wide range of challenges, such as kidnapping, brutality, rape, and inhuman treatment (Egypt/Sudan 1). Some of the victims from Sudan are sold and trafficked to the Sinai region or have their relatives forced to pay ransom. When such payments are unavailable, the abductors might decide to kill some of these victims.
In the article “Towards a Sociology of Forced Migration and Social Transformation”, the reader observes that forced migration has become a major challenge since the 1990s. For instance, the levels of asylum seekers, refugee flows, and human-induced displacements have been on the rise (Castles 13). Unfortunately, most of the past studies founded on sociological models have failed to analyze such developments and propose superior strategies to deal with them.
Humanitarian crisis has become a major problem in some of the troubled regions in the Middle East. In the article “Rights, Needs or Assistance? The Role of the UNHCR in Refugee Protection in the Middle East ”, the author tries to examine the definition of the word “protection” within the context of the United Nations High Commissioners for Refugees (UNHCR) agenda and policy. In Lebanon and Jordan, this office pursued a rights-based strategy to achieve its aims and meet the demands of more victims (Stevens 264). However, the framework has failed to offer the required support in Iraq and Syria despite the challenges many individuals have been going through. These gaps are attributable to the confusing UNHCR’s definition of protection and the absence of effective strategies to help the needy. Nonetheless, many neighboring countries are usually willing to support the wellbeing of the affected refugees by providing long-term assistance.
The article “Misyar Marriage as Human Trafficking in Saudi Arabia” exposes an issue that different scholars have ignored over the years. Human trafficking and abuse of natural rights remain prevalent in different regions (Doe 1). The case of Saudi Arabia reveals how gender roles and traditional policies continue to worsen the situation for more Islamic women. National identity symbols are notorious for supporting various malpractices and making it impossible for more female citizens to pursue their goals.
Synthesis and Critique
While the studied articles offer different explanations and viewpoints, they all focus on the challenges human beings face in troubled regions. For instance, the common theme of humanitarian crisis is evident since the authors have described the unique predicaments asylum seekers and refugees encounter. For instance, majority of them experience violence from their abductors while others are kidnapped and trafficked. Some of the criminal gangs involved in such misbehaviors will ask for ransom from the relatives of such victims and kill them when no cash is paid (Egypt/Sudan 3). These challenges are making it impossible for more people to receive the necessary protection.
The expectation of the greatest majority is that individuals in troubled countries would seek refuge and receive support from neighboring states. The problem of immigration requires that different stakeholders collaborate and share ideas to provide a common solution to the victims. Unfortunately, majority of them suffer even when they are in places that are expected to be safe. Additionally, the problem of humanitarian crisis has continued to exist despite the strategies different organizations have put in place (Stevens 276). These developments reveal that the relevant agencies and organizations have not been completing their roles diligently. The emerging theories and protectionism models have failed to provide superior ideas for tackling such challenges and bringing aid to more possible beneficiaries.
In many countries affected by civil wars, majority of the citizens have died while others continue to lack support due to the ineffectiveness of the UNHCR’s initiatives and its inability to complete various roles diligently. This office continues to complicate the situation by failing to offer guidelines for willing nations to help and empower more victims to lead better lives and access their freedoms (Stevens 271). These revelations explain why similar challenges will be recorded in the near future. More people will find it hard to get the necessary support, be trafficked, and eventually fail to lead better lives. This becomes a major predicament that the global society needs to examine from different informed perspectives and present evidence-based solutions.
After going through the presented articles, it is agreeable that there are theoretical issues that different leaders need to consider. First, conflict theory is a powerful sociological concept that tries to analyze the possible sources of disturbances and violence and their implications on people’s experiences. This model could become the best background for analyzing these problems and identifying additional ideas to protect more victims in troubled areas. Second, feminism theories are evident since they try to expose the disparities and challenges that many women have continued to go through in their respective societies (Doe 13). Such frameworks could become the best sources of ideas and allow humanitarian responders to understand the challenges women have to go through. Third, sociological theory could explain how and why human trafficking remains a global predicament today (Castles 24). This knowledge could influence a paradigm shift and encourage more professionals to consider new ways of collaborating to address these humanitarian problems.
The studied readings raise various questions regarding the nature of humanitarian crisis as experienced in the world. First, the articles encourage readers to ask why more people continue to experience diverse problems while the global society has powerful agencies that are capable of mitigating them. Second, the readings compel the reader to ask why UNHCR has failed to improve the lives of refugees in different camps (Stevens 264). Third, different analysts would wonder why the global community has failed to collaborate and implement powerful measures to mitigate most of these issues and support the welfare and rights of more people in every corner of the world (Castles 26). These questions should guide or compel different stakeholders to find better and sustainable answers to help more people facing the problems outlined above.
Personally, I would agree with the arguments presented in the identified articles. The studies are completed in a professional manner, thereby providing detailed insights about some of the predicaments and pains many people in troubled countries have to go through. The case of Saudi Arabia is also agreeable since the existing traditional ideologies and practices have created the environment for undermining women and increasing their chances of being victimized (Castles 27). Finally, these articles challenge other works that try to promote some of the measures and practices put in place to help refugees and minimize cases of human trafficking. Consequently, the insights and analyses try to challenge and encourage all stakeholders and governments across the globe to reconsider their strategies and introduce superior mechanisms to deal with humanitarian crises (Egypt/Sudan 6). A collaborative strategy is appropriate since it has the potential to deliver positive results much faster and make it possible for more victims to lead better and healthy lives.
Conclusion
The global society continues to ignore the plight and suffering of many individuals in troubled regions or those who are trafficked from one place to another. The identified articles have presented informative arguments regarding such a predicament, the potential barriers, and inadequacies of the existing systems and cultural practices. The questions outlined above should become powerful models to guide policymakers to present superior measures that can protect such victims and take them closer to their goals. In conclusion, governments across the world need to collaborate, identify potential abusers, and help citizens in regions characterized by civil or long-term wars to deliver positive results.
Works Cited
Castles, Stephen. “Towards a Sociology of Forced Migration and Social Transformation.” Sociology, vol. 77, no. 1, 2003, pp. 13-34.
Doe, Stephanie. “Misyar Marriage as Human Trafficking in Saudi Arabia.” Global Tides, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1-32.
Egypt/Sudan: Refugees and Asylum-Seekers Face Brutal Treatment, Kidnapping for Ransom, and Human Trafficking. Amnesty International Publications, 2013.
Stevens, Dallal. “Rights, Needs or ASSISTANCE? The Role of the UNHCR in Refugee Protection in the Middle East.” The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 20, no. 2, 2016, pp. 264–283.