Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

People should work hard to eradicate famine and other disasters; and help those less privileged with donations. A person’s charitable behavior is significantly determined by what the individuals close to him are expecting to do or what they are doing. An individual with more money than he needs to support his dependants and his individuals must work in conjunction with the government to end hunger. Peter Singer argues that people need to be doing their best so that starvation can be eradicated, and giving substantial amounts of donations and population control would be the best means to end hunger.

The author maintains his argument that individuals should do their best to help the needy within the community. Singer considers the act of giving as “supererogatory,” an act that is pleasant to do but is not illegal in avoiding doing it (Singer, 2020). He writes that people should spend money on helping them rather than buying clothes that are not useful. The writer argues that each person should be hardworking to combat the suffering other individuals undergo due to famine or other disasters (Burgess-Jackson, 2020). It is good to make other people happy; however, it is not wrong to avoid doing such an act. Imperative of duty informs people that they ought to do what is good but not wrong to do. Many people, such as students, fail to conquer with Smith’s arguments on famine relief (Sackris, 2021). From a moral standpoint, preventing the starvation of millions of individuals must be considered vital, like following societal norms. However, the author also stresses that population control is critical, as just donating money to Bengal refugees leads to postponing the problem to their children.

References

Burgess-Jackson, K. (2020). Famine, affluence, and hypocrisy. Philosophy, 10(7), 397-413. Web.

Sackris, D. (2021). Famine, Affluence, and Amorality. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 17(2). Web.

Singer, P. (2020). Famine, affluence and morality. In Global Justice (pp. 15-31). Routledge India. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2023, February 28). Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peter-singers-arguments-on-hunger-eradication/

Work Cited

"Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication." IvyPanda, 28 Feb. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/peter-singers-arguments-on-hunger-eradication/.

References

IvyPanda. (2023) 'Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication'. 28 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2023. "Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication." February 28, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peter-singers-arguments-on-hunger-eradication/.

1. IvyPanda. "Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication." February 28, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peter-singers-arguments-on-hunger-eradication/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Peter Singer’s Arguments on Hunger Eradication." February 28, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/peter-singers-arguments-on-hunger-eradication/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1