Introduction
An article summary entails a concise, well-written document describing a single academic article guided by a critical examination of that work. Primarily, an article summary serves to give the audience a quick rundown of the study. This paper details “Population, Policy, and Politics,” “Let the People Go,” and “Overpopulation Discourse.” It further discusses the common ideals among them.
Discussion
In “Population, Policy, and Politics: How Will History judge China’s One-Child Policy?,” Feng et al. (2013) explain that many societies have issues due to rapid population increase. According to Feng et al. (2013), the birth control movement participates actively with support from nation-state governments. The scholars note that the governments of industrialized countries and private foundations boosted their funding. In addition, Feng et al. (2013) claim that the concept of one-child households is a strategy for lowering the birth rate.
In “Let the People Go: The Problem with Strict Migration Limits,” Michael and Justin explain that immigration has a variety of beneficial impacts, as many scholars demonstrate. Economists have discovered a reduction in crime in English and Welsh communities as a result of the large number of immigrants (Clemens & Sandefur, 2014). Furthermore, in Spain and the US, immigration has also increased local property values. Additionally, the scholars point out that natives and immigrants benefit from better returns on capital investments, faster economic growth, and consequently higher labor demand.
In “Overpopulation Discourse: Patriarchy, Racism, and the Specter of Ecofascism,” Jordan and Cassidy explain that birth control and family planning must be viewed in light of the global historical interactions with varied communities. Dyett and Thomas (2019) claim that sterilization, birth control, and family planning services are creeping ethnocide and tools of colonialism. However, scholars believe that the primary environmental issue for reducing poverty is population decline.
Common Ideals in the Articles
One common ideal among the articles is that the majority of the world’s issues result mostly from overpopulation. Every global community feels the impacts of global food, water, and energy shortages (Feng et al., 2013). Furthermore, countries have been able to preserve their welfare thanks to imports. However, this cannot continue indefinitely because the population is growing everywhere. According to Clemens and Sandefur (2014), a good likelihood exists that several nations will require their products to feed their populations. A universal population control program is the only answer. Besides, the economic world and religions are generally concerned with population expansion. For the wealthy, allowing welfare to decline can be as challenging as helping the poor escape poverty (Dyett & Thomas, 2019). Therefore, the growth scenario still predominates in thinking about solutions to global crises.
Across the articles, immigration entailing the global movement of individuals to a foreign country to establish themselves as nationals is a current concern. According to Feng et al. (2013), migration has positive economic impacts on both the sending and receiving countries. Moreover, development economists argue that lowering labor flow barriers between developing and wealthy nations is an effective strategy for alleviating poverty. As Dyett and Thomas (2019) put it, good immigration can help the aging global North’s demographic problem. Therefore, societal and natural barriers play an effective role in influencing immigration events.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the population’s impact on migration is key to addressing the most basic global problems. However, individuals must concede that migration can help a country relieve some of its social, economic, and security burdens. For instance, it can assist in supporting an aging population in certain situations. To address the world’s problems, everyone must practice ecological responsibility.
References
Clemens, M., & Sandefur, J. (2014). Let the people go: The problem with strict migration limits. Foreign Aff., 93, 152.
Dyett, J., & Thomas, C. (2019). Overpopulation discourse: Patriarchy, racism, and the specter of ecofascism. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 18(1-2), 205-224. Web.
Feng, W., Cai, Y., & Gu, B. (2013). Population, policy, and politics: how will history judge China’s one-child policy?Population and development review, 38, 115-129. Web.