Joberte does a recommendable job in determining if the bags are being underfilled. He effectively tests the mean weight of the bags by setting alternative and null hypotheses as less than or equal to 50 lbs, respectively. In his post, Joberte used the significant level X as 0.05 to attain the critical value. The development of null and alternative hypotheses and testing shows Joberte’s mastery of testing assumptions against the actual and observed data. Besides, he did the calculations openly so anyone could follow and understand.
Additionally, Joberte offers a tentative conclusion that reminds the reader of the significant contents and findings. In his determination, he disregards the null hypothesis and uses his data to support that the average mean weight of the bags was less than 50 pounds. Joberte uses this section to summarise the main points of the research and clarify the details to the examiner. He recommends machinery recalibration as the primary solution to bag underfilling since proper packaging is a reliable strategy to protect the bags from environmental conditions and reduce contamination (Ait-Oubahou et al., 2019). Hence, this quality discussion adheres to the writing guidelines. The author also makes a point of the report clear and convincing.
References
Ait-Oubahou, A., Hanani, Z. N., & Jamilah, B. (2019). Packaging. In Postharvest Technology of Perishable Horticultural Commodities (pp. 375-399). Woodhead Publishing.