Victor refuses to create a friend for the Creature. The Monster’s loneliness in the human world makes him aggressive. Victor cannot become his companion because he hates the Monster. That is why he decides to kill his creator.
Detailed answer:
Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus in 1818. It is still actual in the 21st century. The level of abilities of a particular human in the era of robots is crucial. In modern society, there is no universal answer to why the Monster wants to destroy Victor. It can be assumed that the main reason is hate and anger of ordinary people toward the ugly personage.
It is crucial to mention the Monster’s loneliness. It explains his intention to kill Victor Frankenstein. At first, the protagonist wants to be friends with the Creature. After a while, he understands the danger of his actions and tries to avoid the Monster. Victor is frightened by the results of his experiment. He wants to destroy the Creature. His main mistake is that he did not create a friend for the Monster. They cannot be companions, and one of them has to die.
The Monster wants to kill Victor Frankenstein to have freedom and unlimited power. The in-depth analysis allows the reader to find out that loneliness is a problem for the Creature. The Monster does not understand how relationships and communication work. He becomes evil, not due to his cruel intentions. He is unable to act like an ordinary person. He desires to become a part of society. But it is an impossible task. Everyone in his environment is afraid of him.
Even his cruelty toward Victor’s family and his wife is striving for attention. The author does not describe the Monster as an antagonist. The surrounding community misunderstands him. There is no one to meet his needs for socialization. Cruelty becomes the only method to get what he wants.
Frankenstein’s behavior requires particular attention. It affects the Monster’s actions. He regrets creating such a beast. His feelings are easily understood by everyone, especially by the Monster. The latter finds no other option than to try to destroy Victor because he limits his freedom. The problem is in the absence of the dialogue between the two men. On the one hand, a conversation could have solved the issue. On the other hand, it was impossible in the given circumstances of mystery and total suspicion.
The issue of the relationships of the human being and the Creature is philosophical. Does Victor have the power and the right to take control of the Monster? Is it possible to assume that the Creature is a part of society despite being artificially designed by another human? It is a problem that is noticeably popular among writers. Bulgakov, Stevenson, and others raised this question in their novels and tales. The interest in this topic means that this question still does not have a universal and the only answer.