Introduction
The portrayal of Benjamin Franklin’s enduring principles from “The Way to Wealth” amplified the appeal of the Jazz Age. This is especially true, considering that these principles were guidelines for how some characters dealt with the consequences that emerged within the opulent setting. The film portrays a compelling story of moral compromise resulting from ambitious pursuits that result in deceit, indulgence, and short-lived ambitions.
The central themes are around the ethical shortcomings of dishonesty and avarice. Franklin’s assertion that an abundance of debt is the primary vice, closely trailed by dishonesty, underscores the evident decline in ethical standards. The opulent soirées orchestrated by Jay Gatsby vividly portray individuals flaunting affluence while concealing their internal conflicts, underscoring the intricate web of deception and materialism.
The work continually underscores the idea that hope is an untrustworthy guiding principle, expressing that relying exclusively on hope hastens one’s decline. Franklin’s ideas remain relevant in modern times, guiding navigating issues linked to money, moral virtue, and the pursuit of the American spirit. The tale delves into Franklin’s wisdom to showcase the individuals’ personal growth against a backdrop of affluence and moral deterioration.
Unveiling Benjamin Franklin’s Lessons Through Myrtle, Nick, and Gatsby
Myrtle Wilson’s Financial Irresponsibility and Unethical Behavior
Resonance of Benjamin Franklin’s principles as expounded in “The Way to Wealth” through the character of Myrtle Wilson in Baz Luhrmann’s adaptive filmic rendition of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby.” First, her first scene in front of the audience tells us of financial irresponsibility and unethical behavior. Initially, Myrtle appears in the novel as the personification of misfortune caused by ignoring the relevance of wealth and integrity (Luhrmann, 2013). The first sin in the novel is accumulated wealth, symbolizing Myrtle’s decision to marry the working-class man – George while fantasizing about a lavish lifestyle. Her involvement in this intricate fabrication lies in this decision.
Her closeness to Tom Buchanan, a wealthy and married man, reveals her ambition of having a well-off life. The other sin of Myrtle’s inclination to spend time with Tom while engaged in an adulterous relationship indicates that she likes to lie and cheat. Franklin’s warning, however, emphasized the disastrous consequences that dishonesty can lead people into. Therefore, the unfortunate fate of Myrtle is the sum of the two violations that were committed against Franklin’s rule. As Tom and Nick reach George’s garage, Myrtle becomes excited upon seeing Buchanan. This reveals how she always wanted a luxurious lifestyle. The critical chapter in this movie shows why Myrtle detested financial discipline, as this was her last day on Earth.
Nick Carraway’s Contrast of Excess and Restraint
In Baz Luhrmann’s film adaptation of “The Great Gatsby,” Nick Carraway personifies Benjamin Franklin’s incisive insight into the opposing characteristics of excess and restraint. We can easily observe the contrast between wild excess and wise self-control when Nick joins one of Gatsby’s sumptuous soirées by immersing himself in Jay Gatsby’s luxurious lifestyle. Tobey Maguire’s Nick represents the intelligent people of Franklin. The perception that Maguire’s character shreds evidence is remarkable in his acknowledgment of the social pressures that prevailed during Gatsby’s parties. Although enticed by its magnificence, Nick maintains his sharp insight into the hollowness and excessive nature of the actions.
The Tragic Consequences of Unwavering Optimism in Gatsby’s Pursuit of Daisy
In contrast, the caricature of idiots is represented by the character played by Leonardo DiCaprio as Jay Gatsby. The lavish parties organized by Gatsby embody a hopeless search for a mirage through hedonism (Luhrmann, 2013). Nick’s practical and wise personality can easily be seen in sharp contrast with DiCaprio’s character, symbolizing the final consequences of chasing after luxury. Moreover, how Gatsby interacts with his visitors shows evidence of Franklin’s maxim. Daisy represents the object of Gatsby’s adoration and has been presented with more emphasis in contrast with Nick and his fellow rivals. This shows how shallow and idiotic the luxurious feasts were, supporting Franklin’s thoughts concerning actual social events.
In a captivating movie scene, Nick represents the highest level of intellectuality. The onlooker sees Nick’s deep happiness while watching during Gatsby’s luxurious party. With this pic, we get an idea of how Nick can still participate in the celebrations but remains uninfluenced by all the abundant illusions of Gatsby’s world. In this film, issues focus mainly on the societal divisions, which look at Maguire’s portrayal of Nick, stressing the stark contrast between Gatsby’s frivolous pursuit of luxury and Nick’s insightful clarity when confronted by wealth.
The film adaptation of “The Great Gatsby” by Baz Luhrmann effectively captures the essence of Benjamin Franklin’s adage against the dangers of excessive reliance on hope. The relentless pursuit of Daisy Buchanan is the primary motivation behind Jay Gatsby’s sad story. Gatsby’s optimism significantly influences Daisy’s decision to get into marriage. Daisy opts for a pragmatic association with Tom Buchanan, driven by the prospect of economic security, rather than being influenced by Gatsby’s transient aspirations. She is confident in the enduring nature of their love, regardless of any challenges they encounter.
An exceptional and steadfast optimism drives Gatsby’s actions in the film. The abundance of his way of life, costly gatherings, and intricate schemes are all driven by his conviction that Daisy may be reclaimed. The essence of Gatsby’s being is intricately intertwined with the thread of hope, which is the driving force behind all of his decisions and actions. Gatsby’s lack of stability and tendency towards impulsive behavior can be traced to his unwavering belief that Daisy will ultimately choose him over Tom. His persistent optimism hinders his ability to effectively perceive the realities of his circumstances, leading him to make impulsive judgments without fully contemplating the repercussions.
The Gatsby narrative culminates in a tragic ending with his demise, serving as a poignant portrayal of the consequences that arise from placing complete reliance on hope. In the film, Gatsby, portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio, meets his death while clinging to the belief that Daisy is reaching out to him (Luhrmann, 2013). This demonstrates the unwavering persistence of optimism even when confronted with an inevitable disaster. Jay Gatsby personifies Franklin’s concept, resulting in a tragic situation where his unwavering optimism for a future with Daisy finally leads to his downfall. Luhrmann explores the intricate consequences of relying on optimism in a society characterized by both affluence and profound disappointment, utilizing the character of Gatsby as a vehicle for investigation.
Conclusion
Myrtle, Nick, and Jay serve as personifications of American culture, reflecting on the principles espoused by Benjamin Franklin and combining them with the themes proposed by Fitzgerald. These failures also fit Franklin’s suspicions about Myrtle concerning dishonesty and indebtedness. Nick demonstrates his profound intellect and wisdom against the backdrop of wealth, akin to the cautionary message. Grand parties are organized by foolishness. Nevertheless, wise persons derive pleasure from them. Gatsby’s cheerfulness is comparable to the advice conveyed by Franklin, whose reliability. The authors seek to analyze notions such as the rich man’s life, the right thing, and the pursuit of happiness in American culture, which is rife with yearning and moral ambiguity.
Reference
Luhrmann, M. (2013). The Great Gatsby [Film]. Village Roadshow Pictures, A&E Television, Bazmark Productions, & Red Wagon Entertainment.