Director’s Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception Essay (Article Review)

Exclusively available on IvyPanda Available only on IvyPanda

Reflection

Corporate governance gives the board of directors of companies the responsibility to oversee the management and direction of the company, and thus monitoring the company’s risk exposure. This implies that if the CEO poses a potential risk to a company, it is within the mandate of the company directors to ensure that the risk does not materialise and lead to loss of shareholders’ wealth. According to the research findings, high levels of trustworthiness perceptions about the CEO’s integrity lead to less monitoring by company directors (Del Brio et al., 2013).

We will write a custom essay on your topic a custom Article Review on Director’s Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception
808 writers online

This finding implies that CEOs have a responsibility to work hard and prove to the board that they are trustworthy and able to lead a company’s strategic direction. These findings concur with the literature presented by Siladi (2006), who argues that CEOs often work hard in response to the greater monitoring pressure by the board of directors. Siladi argues that monitoring managerial actions is part of the board’s responsibility as the company needs to be vigilant against managerial malfeasance.

This paper also establishes that the board is more likely to provide more resources to managers if the latter is frequently and effectively monitored. In retrospect, frequent monitoring and evaluation of CEOs result in high performance and integrity among the managers. This element is also found in Siladi’s research as it establishes that professionally managed firms have higher market-to-book ratios because of the periodic evaluation of the executive management by the board of directors (Siladi, 2006).

Paper Critique

This research paper is relevant to the body of existing literature regarding corporate governance. The study establishes a relationship between the director’s behaviour and the trustworthiness perception of company CEOs. As such, this study has found a correlation between increased director’s monitoring and performance evaluation of CEOs and their trustworthiness. The most significant aspect of this study is that it adds to the already existing literature on corporate governance and particularly the impacts of CEO trustworthiness on director’s monitoring.

The research conducted by Del Brio et al. (2013) is also unique because, unlike much of the existing literature on corporate governance, this study has examined the behaviour of directors and chief executive officers. The study mainly focuses on the perception of the board of governors on the performance evaluation and monitoring of managers. Although this presents the unique aspect of the research, it is also an inherent source weakness. The study focuses on the interpersonal dimensions of the directors and managers. It is hard to study the relationship between managers and the board of directors because these parties have tight schedules.

Many do not even yield to requests to hold interviews or fill in questionnaires. This means that the data used in the research to analyse the correlation between managers’ and directors’ perceptions had reliability issues. This is more so because it is normally hard to retrieve sensitive information concerning the performance of managers because such information is regarded as confidential to particular companies.

Another weakness of this study is that, despite the significant contribution it has to the existing literature, the study significantly relied on self-report data (Del Brio et al., 2013). The sample used by the researchers was also small and could not provide a better representation of the population. According to the law of statistical research, a larger sample size provides a better representation of the population variables. This implies that a smaller sample may have a large margin of error, which raises the credibility and reliability issues with the findings. Therefore, it is hard to relate these findings with the generic agency theory because of the limitation of the sample size.

1 hour!
The minimum time our certified writers need to deliver a 100% original paper

References

Del Brio, E., Yoshikawa, T., Connelly, C. E., & Tan, W. L. (2013). The Effects of CEO Trustworthiness on Directors’ Monitoring and Resource Provision. Journal of business ethics, 118(1), 155-169.

Siladi, B. (2006). The role of non-executive directors in corporate governance: An evaluation. Swinburne: Swinburne University of Technology.

Print
Need an custom research paper on Director’s Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perceptio... written from scratch by a professional specifically for you?
808 writers online
Cite This paper
Select a referencing style:

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, June 21). Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporate-governance-research-paper-analysis/

Work Cited

"Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception." IvyPanda, 21 June 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/corporate-governance-research-paper-analysis/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception'. 21 June.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception." June 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporate-governance-research-paper-analysis/.

1. IvyPanda. "Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception." June 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporate-governance-research-paper-analysis/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Director's Behaviour and Company CEOs Trustworthiness Perception." June 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/corporate-governance-research-paper-analysis/.

Powered by CiteTotal, easy essay referencing maker
If you are the copyright owner of this paper and no longer wish to have your work published on IvyPanda. Request the removal
More related papers
Cite
Print
1 / 1