Drug Policy Dilemma
The two essential foundations of safety and morality are at odds with one another constantly in the discussion of drug policy. The question of how society should view drug use, distribution, and regulation is at the core of this contentious topic with different ramifications for society. Both sides present convincing justifications for their positions, highlighting the need to carefully weigh the data supporting each one.
Safety as the Answer
Since it allows for harm reduction tactics, supporters of drug regulation claim that this is a safer strategy. Governments may regulate the dose and quality of medications by regulating them, ensuring that people have access to safer medications (Marlan, 2019). This can lessen the chance of unintentional overdose, adulteration, and the transmission of infections linked to injecting drugs, such as HIV.
Criminal organizations frequently manage violent illicit markets that arise as a result of drug prohibition. Drug control might contribute to safer communities by reducing the size of these violent black marketplaces (Smith, 2015). Bringing down drug-related violence can improve public safety.
Millions of nonviolent offenders have been imprisoned as a result of the criminalization of drug possession, which can have detrimental social and economic effects. Governments may create safer, more stable communities by controlling drugs by lowering the number of persons involved in the criminal justice system (Marlan, 2019).
For people who are battling addiction, a controlled system can assist in enhancing access to treatment and rehabilitation options. When people may get assistance without worrying about legal ramifications, safety can be increased, which lessens the harm that drug use does to both individuals and their communities (Smith, 2015).
To guarantee that chemicals are manufactured and supplied under safe and standardized circumstances, the regulation of medicines involves stringent quality control methods. As a result, user safety can be improved. This can considerably lower the hazards associated with contaminants, contamination, and unexpected activity frequently found in illegal drugs (Marlan, 2019).
Through taxation and lower expenses for law enforcement, drug regulation can have a positive impact on the economy. By treating the underlying causes of drug misuse and addiction, tax funds from the sales of legal drugs may be allocated to public health and education initiatives, so enhancing public safety (Smith, 2015).
Morality as the Answer
Some people contend that drug use is intrinsically sinful, frequently because of religious or cultural values. They contend that in order to sustain moral standards and stop substance usage from becoming more commonplace, society must retain tough drug laws (Kim et al., 2022).
Drug regulation is criticized because some people think it implies that drug usage is acceptable or tolerated in society. They contend that this would encourage drug usage, which would raise the socioeconomic costs of addiction, such as family dissolution, lower productivity at work, and medical expenses (Smith & Appelbaum, 2021).
Drug control critics claim that allowing users to transition from milder substances to stronger ones might open the door to other vices. They contend that upholding criminalization largely deters people from using drugs, safeguarding public morals (Marlan, 2019).
The legalization of drugs might pave the way for immoral corporate exploitation akin to what the tobacco industry experienced (Smith, 2015). The community may be placed in danger if profits from drug sales put financial gain ahead of public safety.
Some people believe that criminalizing drugs is vital to protect cultural values and customs. They contend that especially in societies where drug use is severely stigmatized, permitting and regulating drug use might erode societal norms and conventional moral principles (Smith & Appelbaum, 2021).
References
Kim, C., Chum, A., Nielsen, A., Allin, S., Penney, T. L., Rittenbach, K. & O’Campo, P. (2022). Associations between recreational cannabis legalization and cannabis-related emergency department visits by age, gender, and geographic status in Ontario, Canada: An interrupted time series study. PLoS One, 17(10). Web.
Marlan, D. (2019). Beyond cannabis: Psychedelic decriminalization and social justice. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 23, 851-892. Web.
Smith, A. (2015). What are the brain and behavioral effects of cannabis on youth? In T. George and F. Vaccarino (Eds.), The effects of cannabis use during adolescence (pp. 16-31). Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Web.
Smith, W. R., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2021). Two models of legalization of psychedelic substances: Reasons for concern. Jama, 326(8), 697-698. Web.
Loading...
