Introduction
Issues and policies regarding fathers’ rights, child support, and shared custody in the United States are a constant topic of debate and concern. The involvement of both parents in the upbringing of children gives them a better chance for development.
Main Body
Instead, children in divorced families are 50% more likely to have health problems than those in two-parent families (Meier, 2020, p. 94). While advances have been achieved in recognizing the significance of fathers’ engagement in their children’s lives, there remain obstacles that complicate the struggle for shared custody for parents in courtrooms.
One of the main issues is the historical bias that privileges mothers as sole caregivers, which can affect court judgments. This prejudice presumes that mothers are inherently more prepared to care for kids, which often results in unequal child custody conditions. In addition, traditional gender roles and societal attitudes may facilitate such expectations. Child support is also another highly debated issue; although they are intended to support the child’s financial well-being, it can be unfairly imposed (Schoppe‐Sullivan & Fagan, 2020). Parents may feel burdened with excessive payments that do not consider their financial circumstances. This financial burden can obstruct their meaningful relationships with their children.
Legal complexities, the absence of uniformity in state laws, and the adversarial nature of litigation are impediments to obtaining joint custody. These factors can cause lengthy and emotionally draining court proceedings that affect fathers disproportionately, who may not have the same resources as mothers to navigate the legal system effectively (Nielsen, 2018). Judges and lawyers have a specific role to play in addressing these problems. Some argue that some judges may still be biased against mothers, which affects custody decisions (Nielsen, 2018).
Conclusion
Lawyers may unintentionally perpetuate these stereotypes due to entrenched social norms and a lack of training on gender-neutral custody procedures. These issues require comprehensive reforms, such as promoting gender-neutral custody decisions.
References
Meier, J. S. (2020). US child custody outcomes in cases involving parental alienation and abuse allegations: what do the data show?Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42(1), 92-105. Web.
Nielsen, L. (2018). Joint versus sole physical custody: Outcomes for children independent of family income or parental conflict. Journal of Child Custody, 15(1), 35-54. Web.
Schoppe‐Sullivan, S. J., & Fagan, J. (2020). The evolution of fathering research in the 21st century: Persistent challenges, new directions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 175-197. Web.
Loading...
