First post
Giving an argument and having an argument with someone are very close. In particular, it is vital that the first phrase mainly refers to the direction of the conclusion of some dispute. It is worth saying that ‘giving an argument is a conclusion of an argument or conversation. This type of argumentation can often be heard in court because it is the last option, and arguments are used by lawyers. Thus it is directly identical to an argument between two people who end up giving their argument.
“Having an argument” with someone can usually be used to describe an abstract discussion. If the previous term implies that one person is present, then the second term directly refers to the involvement of two people. Usually, this expression refers to an actual fight, which involves the people involved devolving into shouting. Very often, people scream and may cry while having an argument. An example can be a quarrel between a married couple because one did not buy milk for home.
The scope of the issues directly affects how people will argue. In addition, it is crucial to understand the environment in which people are. The environment directly affects what type of drink people will have and whether it will consist of giving an argument or having an opinion. Disputes are traditionally based on individual problems, and such issues are understood differently by people, so the type of reference can also be different.
Second Post
The context given by the student demonstrates that there are separate situations that involve ‘having an argument and ‘giving arguments.’ All of these things relate to the background of the dispute and its course because contexts are important. It is important that “having an argument” is the direct participation of two sides of the conflict when there is a discussion between people. In particular, the student must give an excellent example, which improves the understanding that “giving an argument” is a reasoned position with well-developed arguments. The case that developed demonstrates that people behave differently in a professional environment. Critical thinking is necessary for opinions because they show how good such words are. It is required to constantly apply essential thinking in quarrels to distinguish all the conversation details clearly. In particular, a person must control his emotional state and critical thinking because, very often, the emotional component can take over, bringing even more disputes.