Introduction
Nowadays, practically no single day goes by without Western countries’ politicians indulging in populist rhetoric on the subject of “artificially created inequality”, in order to win support of marginalized masses. However, as famous Orwellian saying goes: all people are equal, but some of them are more equal then the others. The reason to this is very simple – humans are the subject of biological evolution, just as plants and animals. In other words, homo sapiens is nothing but intermediary link between apes and super-men. Organic life and consequentially the intelligent life is universe’s tool of dealing with the spread of energetic entropy. The increasing complexity of living organisms prevents the establishment of energetic balance in cosmos; therefore, it is in the core of human nature to strive towards higher existential complexity, which eventually results in establishing preconditions for “evolutionary jumps”. The ultimate purpose of biological evolution is to create God-like specie, which will be able to manipulate with laws of thermo-dynamics, thus averting the “energetic collapse” of universe. This is the reason why various socio-political theories that promote people’s equality are best referred to as utterly unscientific, because “equality” is nothing but euphemism for death, as it implies the establishment of energetic stalemate on social level.
Main Text
Today, people in Western countries are being forcibly required to “celebrate diversity”, or to face the threat of being fired from their jobs and even consequently persecuted, simply because they happened not to be as “tolerant” as hawks of political correctness would like them to appear. However, the inconvenient truth about the policy of multiculturalism has proven itself as being just too obvious to be effectively hidden from public attention. This truth is very simple – the percentile ratio of White people in population of every particular country, corresponds to this country’s civilizational attractiveness. This is because the evolutionary laws of nature are objective in their essence. The reason why it were namely White people, who had proven themselves capable of pushing cultural and scientific progress forward, throughout the centuries, is because they are entitled with the inborn ability of operating with highly abstract categories (high IQ rate). Such their ability had created metaphysical preconditions for the emergence of culture and science in the first place, whereas African Blacks of Australian aboregenees, for example, were never able to evolve beyond the Stone Age, before they had encountered “White Gods” for the first time. It is only through establishing social contacts with White people that natives were able to advance themselves socially, regardless of whether they lived in Africa, Asia or South America, which points out at them as representatives of fully specialized human sub-specie. However, once the White settlers were forced to leave “post-colonial” countries, after having built railroads, hospitals, schools and churches, the Darwinian laws of evolution had immediately reduced non-White natives back to their “natural status” of primeval savages, driven by animalistic urges. For example, it has only taken ten years for South African Republic, under the Black rule, to be reduced from the most culturally and technologically advanced country in Africa, to the Third World slump, with the highest crime rate in the world, and with 90% of country’s citizens being infected with AIDS. Thus, the existence of inequality among people is absolutely objective in its very essence, as it has its roots in biology rather then in inefficiency of “euro-centric” political doctrines. The reason why, after the end of colonial era, Africa was being turned into the arena of never-ending tribal war, just as it was the case before the arrival of European explorers, has nothing to do with the “legacy of apartheid” or with “historical injustice”, but solemnly with the fact that African Blacks’ average IQ rate equals 60 (as it is being illustrated in Richard Lynn’s book “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”), whereas White people who score lower then 70, during the course of IQ tests, are being declared as mentally deficient. Before politically correct censorship began to undermine the empirical value of Western socio-political theories, it would never occur to European intellectuals to think of themselves as being fully equal to African cannibals, for example, because there is plenty of anthropologic, historical, psychological and etymological evidence as to the fact that, in terms of evolutionary development, Black race is at least three million years behind the White race. We can deny this all we want, just as we can deny that it is Earth, which revolves around the Sun and not the other way around, but it will not change the fact that people’s social inequality is simply a reflection of their biological value. As the utter ideological failure of Marxism and neo-Liberalism has proven, people cannot be made equal by government passing legislations that are meant to eliminate racial or gender discrimination, with the mean of declaring such discrimination as “immoral”. The attempt to forcibly impose people’s equality constitutes a transgression against the laws of nature and therefore, can only lead to death and destruction. Before the outbreak of WW2, the Communist promoters of “universal brotherhood” had managed to slaughter sixty million Russians, simply because they belonged to a wrong social class – all in the name of equality. Nowadays, the spiritual and often biological descendants of Bolshevik commissars, under disguise of Liberals, are actively striving to put an end to Western civilization, as we know it, by promoting degenerative ideas of “multicultural equality”. The consequences of such their activities can be observed even today – the worsening of criminological situation, the lowering of educational standards and the rapidly widening gap between rich and poor.
As we have shown earlier, it is simply impossible to effectively address the issue of people’s existential inequality, without possessing a scientific racially-biological worldview. However, once we embrace such worldview, the solution how to end such inequality will become obvious – governments would have to simply restore a racial homogeneity of Western societies. After this, a comprehensive eugenic program would have to be given an official status, as the ultimate tool of improving people’s biological value from generation to generation. Citizens’ physical and mental inadequacy will be dealt with in swift and effective manner. In its turn, this will eliminate genetic preconditions for existentially deviant individuals to be born in the future. As a result, citizens’ legislated equality will eventually begin to correspond to their actual worth. This will allow policy-makers to take a full advantage of the concept of national solidarity, within a context of building a truly fair and just society. People would be able enjoy the liberty of private entrepreneurship for as long as their commercial activities will not undermine the well-being of a nation, as whole. The notion of private ownership will remain undisputed. State will provide young families with free housing and will also take care of elderly people. It is citizens’ labour, and not the monetary capital, which is going to represent the greatest economic value, regardless of whether we discuss it within a context of their physical or intellectual activities. The means of production and capital will be referred to simply as tools of insuring citizens’ prosperity. The main function of a State would not be the reconciliation of people’s existential inconsistencies, but utilization of their biological potential, to insure that the process of evolution stays on its natural course. However, even then, a certain forms of social inequality would still exist, as a side-effect of people continuing to be subjected to Darwinian laws.
Bibliography
Dawkins, Richard “The Selfish Gene”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
Darwin, Charles “On the Origins of Species”. 1872. Internet Infidels. 2008. Web.
Freud, Sigmund “Civilization and Its Discontents”. UK, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.
Lynn, Richard “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”. UK, London: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002.
Spencer, Lee “Apes, Apemen and Men”. 2004. Earth History Research Centre. 2008. Web.