Introduction
“The Brothers Karamazov” by Fyodor Dostoevsky is centered on the notion that every individual has the freedom to decide to believe in God, embrace morals, and choose good or evil. In “The Grand Inquisitor,” the writer examines the misuse of authority figures’ power. However, the killing of one person or the exercise of power cannot be justified due to immorality, making some arguments in the books unacceptable.
The Brothers Karamazov
Can One Innocent Child’s Suffering Be Justified for the Greater Good?
First, Ivan Karamazov poses a question that challenges the morality of God. If challenged with the same question, I would respond that torturing “just one tiny creature” is not justified for the happiness of the many (Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov 222). The life of one innocent child is invaluable, and it is not morally justifiable to sacrifice it for the benefit of others.
Ivan’s Rebellion Against God: A Justified Moral Stand or Emotional Rejection?
Moreover, Ivan rebels against God and argues that if God were indeed omnipotent, he would not allow evil to exist (Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov). I agree and believe it is morally justifiable to question God’s morality in the face of such suffering. However, Ivan’s rejection of God’s world is a rejection of life itself, and he fails to see the beauty that exists in the world.
The Grand Inquisitor
The Grand Inquisitor’s Rationalization of Power: Compassion or Control?
In “The Grand Inquisitor,” Dostoevsky explores the abuse of power by those in authority. The work rationalizes the Inquisitor’s use of force by claiming that he is acting in the best interest of the people. I disagree with such justification since the use of power to control and manipulate others is a violation of their autonomy. The Grand Inquisitor and the leaders of the Catholic Church utilize their position of authority to torture the people rather than make sacrifices to make people happy (Dostoevsky, The Grand Inquisitor).
Nietzsche’s Moral Lens: Is the Grand Inquisitor a Master or Slave Moralist?
This is a violation of the Judeo-Christian ethic, which emphasizes the importance of treating others with love. In this case, slave morality values obedience and conformity over individual autonomy and creativity (Nietzsche 201). Nietzsche would not consider the Inquisitor a master moralist because the use of power is rooted in fear and a desire for control.
Conclusion
Hence, arguments in the books cannot justify the killing of one person or the use of power since they are immoral. The Grand Inquisitor’s misuse of authority and Ivan’s disobedience to God both emphasize the moral difficulties of the human experience. Killing one person or oppressing the masses violates people’s autonomy and dignity, and it is vital to adhere to morals and respect people’s unique individuality.
Works Cited
Dostoyevsky, Fyodor. The Brothers Karamazov. Dover Publications, 2012.
—. The Grand Inquisitor. Floating Press, 2009.
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Vintage Books, 1966.