Introduction
In the Napoleon Beazley case, the interactionist perspective caused Napoleon Beazley to murder John Luttig. Primarily, Napoleon Beazley’s interactions with society of which it makes people behave toward each other. Society shapes how people behave, and this could be why it was Napoleon Beazley was involved in the murder of John Lutting by first being involved in the carjacking. The aim of the case of Napoleon uses sociological perception to explain why he murdered John Lutigg.
Sociological Perspective
During the times of Napoleon Beazley, the society was that of survival and committing crimes as a group due to peer pressure and the strive to get money. Beazley was not 18 years when he committed the carjacking, but he and two other youths to Tyler, Texas. Beazley’s friend, Cedric Coleman, drove, and Cedric’s younger brother, Donald, was with them, of which the group could be ascertained to be committing a crime. Napoleon Beazley borrowed her mother’s car and followed John Luttig, who was driving a Mercedes. The accounts of Cedric and Donald Coleman testified against Beazley, and this affirms that Bezley was murdered reaching 18 years.
During the times of Napoleon Beazley, the youths had experienced unruly cognitive development that resulted in biological phases of human development that may have negatively influenced him to commit the offense. The social constructions during Beazley times were demanding individuals to try to have good cars so that they could brag about it during school. It was this vital urge that Napoleon Beazley decided to commit the offense of carjacking, and it was found that he had the intention of murdering by shooting John Lutigg in the head.
The social inequalities that led to the murder of John Luttig are that Napoleon Beazley was living in a society where people struggled to make a living. Beazley, although from a two-parent family, showed off with the Mercedes that he saw John Lutigg was driving, and this may have made his plan on how he could steal it. The social constructions during his time did not allow him to own one because he was still studying and hence did not have the income to purchase the Mercedes. This social issue caused him to carjack John Putting to steal his car. The guilt that Beazley could also be a result of the desire to be admired by people in the school, of which he claimed that by getting Mercedes, he could take it to school to show off car to the students.
Conclusion
The society of Napoleon Beazley allowed persons under the age of 18 years to be tried for murder charges. Beazley was a person who committed the crime, and he got victimized for doing that even if there were the issue of filing a person for cases that entailed murdering John Luttig. Primarily, allowing the prosecutors to continue with the point made society aware of why persons under the age of 18 need to attend counseling sessions on issues relating to crimes. If Beazeley could have observed such assertions, then some of the problems that he was fighting at the time could have been solved, particularly those relating to high school life and crimes. Therefore, the social perception of Napoleon Beazley’s crime was that he was still a juvenile, and hence his social life contributed significantly to his death.