Social class in countries like England historically has been clear-cut or firm. However, this is not the case with the United States. There are no clear-cut variances in the social class in the country. Social class affects everyday lives even though they are not always notable, and we might want to discharge their implication. It affects the foods we eat, the beverages we drink, and the types of restoration we enjoy. However, observing different resources will emphasize the lens of class as will bring to the surface variances that we already recognize as necessary (Swartz, 66).
Social capital is the common systems, casual configurations, and customs that acquaint personalities to a cooperative act. It tends to bend to what a person knows, whom he knows, which will be useful in defining the product of the society. Cultural capital is a form of resource that conceptualizes things like oral capability, general cultural awareness, artistic likings, information about conservatory structures, and educational credentials. It emerges when investors exchange currencies, strive for profits, and, in the case of educational credentials in recent years. Economic capital is in the form of power an individual possesses that results from the profession and esteem of an individual (Swartz, 80). Therefore, a person can use economic capital in classifying the above menu.
.It is easy to identify those cultural variances; however, we may not recognize how substantial they can be in people’s lives. For example, one person could love putting on a pair of jeans and a T-shirt while at work, and the other person must be in a suit, which means that the changes in them are entangled to culture and material resources and can serve as means of segregation. In economic differences, it is essential to know the status and honor of the person in the society as earned from the respective occupation. A working-class will opt for the Prescott because of his high esteem and his status. The restaurant tends to offer a menu that matches his status and esteem. The economic capital difference does not become distinct. This is where a person is financially well off as compared to others in society. This leads the person to have higher preferences in life than people with low-income earners. For example, a working-class will believe that where it is expensive, there is quality service, which is, in this case, the Prescott’s. At this place, he can comfortably afford services on the menu without any strain because he has the power (Swartz, 75).
A low-income earner, on the other hand, can afford the menu from the grandma’s kitchen without any financial constraint. Firstly, this low has low prestige in the society. His status can only allow him to use the grandma’s menu. This has led to his low self-esteem. However, the esteem is not all-time low grandma’s dinner has a good menu, only that it is not to the quality of a working-class (Swartz, 76).
In conclusion, social class affects us on a daily basis. Social class tends to pre-determine the foods we eat, how we behave, and even how we rate ourselves. We can have high esteem, but not in the same honor level with the same level of another person with the same esteem.
Work cited
Swartz, David. Culture & Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. Print.