Crann, J. (2021). Talent from marginalized groups more likely to notice discrimination at work than their peers. Strategy. Web.
This article by Crann addresses the issue of discrimination toward members of specific groups in work and peer settings. In this aspect, the material focuses on the different elements influencing discriminatory attitudes toward people. More specifically, Crann highlights characteristics such as gender, religion, sexual orientation, and disability. The source includes statistical data concerning the issues of discrimination against people possessing characteristics that identify them as a minority.
Compared to Patki’s narrative, this article focuses primarily on discrimination factors against different populations in the work setting and peer interactions. However, both authors address the issue of employment and exchange with society among certain groups as it relates to the personal experience of Rundle neighborhood residents. Thus, Crann’s article provides more detailed evidence to support Patka’s narrative regarding discrimination in the workplace and other settings.
Jahiu, J., & Cinnamon, J. (2022). Media coverage and territorial stigmatization: an analysis of crime news articles and crime statistics in Toronto. GeoJournal, 87(6). 4547–4564. Web.
Jahiu and Cinnamon investigate territorial stigma in the context of crime in a particular area. This source analyzes news articles related to Toronto’s crime statistics. In addition, Jahiu and Cinnamon emphasize the disproportionate reporting of offenses in different areas, which constitutes a barrier to destigmatization. Thus, this article addresses the stigmatization of communities in the context of current statistics and coverage of various Toronto neighborhoods by the mass media.
The data presented by Jahiu and Cinnamon correlate with the information of the Patki narrative since they identify crime as one of the determinants of territorial stigmatization. In this aspect, the primary source confirms the tendency towards a higher frequency of crime. Nevertheless, Patki does not provide detailed data regarding crime in the context of its impact on stigmatization. Therefore, Jahiu and Cinnamon’s article offers a more comprehensive perspective on one of the stigmatization factors.
Social Science Research / University of Amsterdam. (2020). How does territorial stigmatisation affect residents? Fenne Pinkster on stigma in the Bijlmer [Video]. YouTube. Web.
The Social Science Research / University of Amsterdam presents a perspective on fundamental aspects of neighborhood stigmatization. The source utilizes data related to the Netherlands and provides information on the most severe problems of territorial stigmatization. In addition, the video refers to research on the various factors that influence stigma. Thus, Social Science Research / University of Amsterdam provides information on the features of stigmatized neighborhoods.
In comparison to the Patki narrative, this material provides perspective on the problem of territorial stigma in the context of a different state. Nevertheless, the source involves information relevant to the stigmatization issue in general. Therefore, the information provided by this source allows for a better understanding of the problems identified in the Patki narrative. Moreover, this material reveals the global nature of the discrimination problems of residents in specific neighborhoods, as it highlights similar problems to Patki’s source.