The phenomenon of authorship is especially significant for the writing field, as it establishes responsibility for the presented content. Published works always require the identification of the individuals who participated in the creation of the paper, as well as the clarification of the contributions made. By establishing authorship, it becomes possible to attribute academic, social, and financial outcomes to people involved in the creation of the writing, highlighting both positive and negative results of the endeavor. Nevertheless, given that the current media platforms and genres are consistently evolving, considering whether the creator should be openly acknowledged becomes a crucial issue. From my perspective, every person who was involved in the production of a publication should be offered credit for participation, and their input should be identified if the author does not wish to remain anonymous.
The significance of authorship becomes especially evident when groundbreaking works are considered. The authors of original literature writings and scholarly studies that bear special importance for the development of specific fields can considerably benefit from such recognition. Furthermore, establishing the creator of a literary piece often aids the researchers in clarifying how this work was produced and which events from the author’s life impacted the writing. After that, community recognition is also advantageous for supporting the content creation endeavors of various authors, as it significantly enhances their motivation. Therefore, when the labor of a creator is acknowledged and positively acclaimed, the probability of literary and scholarly works production is tremendously elevated.
However, of special importance are the negative effects of authorship, which might prompt the emergence of adverse outcomes. In specific scenarios, the anonymity of the creator should be preserved, thus maintaining the right to privacy and protecting the author from such consequences as negative feedback, allegations, and bias. Thus, even though I believe that it is essential to establish authorship, the writer’s decision to sustain anonymity is considerably more significant, meaning that the author’s choice to remain unidentified should always be respected.