Purpose
The purpose of this report is basically to assess the feasibility of using a 3D operating machine in New York Hospital.
Problem
The number of patients who have been checking in for internal scanning and those who have already been earmarked for cancer operation at the New York Health Facility, is more that what the facility can handle with a reasonable period of time (Finkelstein 2008). The main reason is because doctors at the facility rely on an inefficient MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) machine to carry out delicate operations in their theaters. Operations using these kinds of machines take a long time to finish and also they do not show internal organs clearly (Finkelstein 2008). With MRI machine, procedures like brain surgery, heart operation and infant operations usually cost patients a lot of money. In addition, they are time consuming, with just one operation being carried out daily. This means that the hospital can only serve close to just 300-360 patients a year. The number is very small given the number of people who are waiting to have similar services.
Practical solution
The hospital has actually decided to purchase a 3D operating machine. Unlike MRI machines, which rely on 2D technology, 3D operating machine uses a robot, which allows surgeons to carry out precise operations particularly in patients suffering from cancer. This machine helps surgeons to reach some places they cannot reach with MRI. In addition, the tools, making this machine can be used for up to ten operations before they are serviced or replaced. In addition, one machine can actually execute more than five hundred procedures in a year. By far, these machines are much better than the MRI machines.
Scope
3D has been in the market for some time now. Its feasibility will be assessed using the following criteria: Availability, cost and performance.
Discussion
Cost
Explanation
The cost, in this case, is both the “street” price of acquiring a single 3D machine and the price that each patient is supposed to pay to use the services that come with this machine.
Data
Based on the available information online, the price of a 3D operating machine ranges from $2 to $3 million (Zhang 2013). In addition, the cost that to be paid by the patient ranges from $1700 to $3000.
Interpretation
The price, in this case, does not represent quality. It only represents the cost of the equipment both production cost and goodwill added to it. From the above simple data, New York facility is much cheaper than other selected facilities. Therefore, New York facility will be highly competitive in the industry.
Availability
Explanation
Availability, in this case, refers to the time taken right from purchase to installation (Finkelstein 2008). The machine must be available within one month of purchase. One month is reasonable given that extra time must be allowed for testing of the machine before is delivered.
Data
The Supplier, the American Intuitive Surgical Company, has the machine already (Zhang 2013). In fact, they have indicated on their website that upon receiving an order, the machine can be delivered within one week.
Interpretation
The required equipment will be available within the required time frame.
Performance
Explanation
Performance entails the ease of working with the machine, the time it takes for an operation to finish and the ease of use.
Data
The table below shows the time it takes to finish a complicated operation using both 3D and MRI machine.
Unlike MRI, which uses radio and electromagnetic waves to visualize inside the body organs, the 3D machine uses the robotic technique. The machine consists of a console placed in the same operating room. It also has a patient side cart. This cart is connected to four interactive robotic arms (Zhang 2013). The arms act like scalpels or scissors. The machine allows the surgeon to clearly see the interior parts and enhanced dexterity. The machine also allows surgeons to perform operations with minimal invasive procedures involving intricate reconstruction or dissection. Since, minimal invasive procedures have been undertaken; the patient recovers much quicker and thus shorter stay in the hospital.
Interpretation
Basing on the ease of use, it has been seen that the machine does not require any special knowledge; it takes shorter time to carry out the surgical procedures. In addition, it leaves the patient with fewer injuries.
Summary
The data presented shows that the 3D operating machine meets demand at the New York health facility. It is affordable both in terms of purchase cost and usability cost. It serves many patients in a year compared to MRI machines which are currently being used.
Conclusions
3D operating machine is a perfect replacement or alternative for use in carrying out delicate operations at New York health facility.
Recommendations
New York health care facility should accept the 3D operating machine as it has many advantages compared to the current MRI machines.
References
Finkelstein, Leo. 2008. Pocket book of technical writing for engineers and scientists. 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Zhang, Song, ed. 2013. Handbook of 3D Machine Vision: Optical Metrology and Imaging. New York: CRC Press.