Caterpillar Inc. is renowned for its commitment to employee engagement and motivation. Phillips et al. (2019) revealed that the company’s various training programs and motivation schemes help improve employee performance and productivity. Central to the company’s strategies for improving employee performance and productivity is the holiday pay scheme. The company provides holiday pay as part of its compensation package for eligible employees either by receiving their regular rate of pay or time-and-a-half for the hours they work on the holiday. Mohammed et al. (2022) asserted that offering holiday pay helps to attract and retain talented employees by demonstrating that the company values its employees’ work-life balance. Compensation packages improve overall productivity, performance, and job satisfaction. Countries like the United States have labor laws that require employers to provide paid time off to their employees (Romig and Bryant, 2021). Caterpillar should assess compliance laws in its area of operation and offer holiday pay schemes accordingly.
Caterpillar’s Holiday Pay Scheme
Investing in a holiday pay program can yield significant long-term benefits for a company’s workforce. Caterpillar Inc. observes several holidays, including New Year’s Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day, with the possibility of recognizing other holidays depending on the location. Afrizal and Adi (2020) demonstrated that employees feel valued and appreciated by offering holiday pay, which can boost their morale and job satisfaction. In turn, this can give the company a competitive edge in attracting top talent. At Caterpillar Inc., their holiday pay program covers eligibility requirements, holiday types, pay rates, record-keeping, scheduled holiday work, and floating holidays. Company staff must work certain number of days or hours to be receive holiday pay. Nonetheless, eligibility varies in relation to roles, responsibilities, and location.
Following this, if an employee is absent on the day before or after a holiday without approval, they may lose their entitlement to holiday pay. Therefore, the number of hours scheduled to work on the holiday and the regular pay rate influence the amount of holiday pay an employee receives. Essentially, employees who meet the eligibility criteria receive either their regular pay or time-and-a-half for holiday hours worked (Afrizal and Adi, 2020; Romig and Bryant, 2021). Changes to scheduled holidays are subject to management approval and records of holiday pay earned and paid to employees are maintained by management.
Holiday Pay Scheme and Employee Motivation
Central to an organization’s success and sustainability is employee engagement and motivation. Motivated individuals are more engaged, productive, and committed, leading to improved job performance and higher customer satisfaction. According to Sweis et al. (2019), motivated employees tend to experience higher job satisfaction, which leads to better retention rates and lower turnover. Motivated employees feel values, and thus, more loyal to their employers and organization. Additionally, motivation is linked to better teamwork, innovation, and creativity, as motivated employees are more willing to take risks and explore new approaches, leading to breakthroughs and competitive advantages (Paais and Pattiruhu, 2020). Motivated employees provide excellent customer service, work well in teams, and collaborate effectively. Implementation of compensation packages such a holiday pay schemes are essential for improving job satisfaction, engagement, and motivation, ultimately increasing overall productivity and profitability.
Population
Caterpillar Inc.’s marketing research encompasses a wide range of demographics based on its offerings, services, and target audience. Population serves as a crucial factor when analyzing Caterpillar Inc.’s holiday pay scheme. The size and attributes of the population can influence various aspects of the study, such as the sampling method, statistical power, external validity, generalizability, and ethical considerations (Creswell, 2021). Further, it is often impractical to survey the entire population, and thus, researchers use sampling techniques to select a representative subset to study. Busetto and Gumbinger (2020) confirmed that the characteristics of the population can impact the sampling method employed and the required sample size to ensure adequate statistical power. The ultimate aim of the research is to make inferences from the sample to the entire population.
Furthermore, a research’s external validity can be affected by the population’s characteristics, limiting its scope if it fails to represent the larger population. Creswell (2021) argued that statistical power is affected by population size. The market analysis of Caterpillar Inc.’s holiday pay scheme focuses on its employees’ geographic, demographic, psychographic, behavioral, and technographic backgrounds. Thus, it is essential to ensure that the characteristics of the population are representative to generalize research findings. Chou et al. (2020) indicated that understanding the population’s characteristics is crucial in developing effective marketing strategies and reaching the target audience. In analyzing Caterpillar Inc.’s holiday pay scheme, the population of focus will be employees.
Sampling Technique
The sampling technique is an essential part of conducting research efficiently. In definition, sampling refers to the process of selecting a representative subset of the population for study. The goal is to choose a sample that accurately reflects the population in terms of relevant characteristics such as age, gender, and income. According to Creswell (2021), a representative sample leads to reliable research findings, reducing the cost and resources needed for research. Additionally, it helps researchers make more accurate estimates of population characteristics or behavior. Sampling further speeds up the research process, allowing for faster data analysis and conclusions. Stratton, (2021) revealed that sampling techniques are commonly utilized for practicality when studying populations, rather than examining the entire population. In the case of Caterpillar Inc., investigating every employee from every company outlet worldwide would not be feasible. Hence, to ensure the reliability and validity of the research findings, a representative group will be selected using a sampling technique.
Various sampling methods such as simple random, stratified, systemic, and cluster sampling can be employed to analyze Caterpillar Inc.’s employees in relation to the efficacy of the company’s holiday pay scheme. Simple random sampling involves randomly selecting employees from the company, which can be done using a database or employee list (Bhardwaj, 2019). Stratified sampling encompasses dividing the population into subgroups or strata based on specific characteristics and selecting a sample from each stratum. Caterpillar Inc. could divide its employees into subgroups based on job title, department, location, or other pertinent factors and then select a sample from each subgroup. Creswell (2021) stated that in cluster sampling, the population is divided into clusters such as departments, branches, or locations, and random clusters are selected to sample from. This technique is useful when obtaining a complete population list is difficult and is often more cost-effective than other sampling methods. In contrast, systematic sampling involves selecting every nth employee from an employee list (Bhardwaj, 2019). Nonetheless, choosing an appropriate sampling technique is dependent on the research question, population, and available resources.
Primary and Secondary Data
Two data types can be used to research and analyze Caterpillar corporation: primary data and secondary data. Primary data is collected directly from the source using research methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, and experiments (Creswell, 2021). This type of data is specific to the research question being asked and is collected for the first time. Although primary data is often more detailed and relevant to the research question, it can be expensive and time-consuming to collect. In contrast, secondary data have already been collected and used by another individual or organization and can be obtained through sources such as published reports, articles, and datasets (Creswell, 2021; Ruggiano and Perry, 2019). While secondary data is often more cost-effective to obtain and can be analyzed quickly, it may not be as specific to the research question or as up-to-date as primary data.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Primary Data
Primary data is more relevant and accurate for the research topic as it’s collected specifically for the study question and directly from the source. Researchers have control over the research process when collecting primary data, ensuring that the data collected is reliable and valid (Creswell, 2021). The level of control allows researchers to tailor the research process to the research question and adjust it in response to study findings. With this flexibility, new and more effective research approaches can be explored. Busetto et al. (2020) outlined that the confidentiality of data can be guaranteed by researchers when collecting primary data, fostering more open and honest responses from participants and producing more accurate and reliable data. Additionally, the collection of primary data can result in the creation of new research tools and techniques, promoting innovation in the field and advancing the boundaries of research.
However, primary data collection poses some disadvantages, including high costs, time-consuming efforts, limited sample sizes, potential bias, limited generalizability, result replication, and ethical concerns. The cost of primary data collection, which includes designing and conducting research studies, recruiting participants, and analyzing data, can be a significant obstacle for researchers with restricted budgets, particularly if large samples are required. Designing and testing research instruments, recruiting participants, collecting data, and analyzing results are crucial tasks that researchers must perform when collecting primary data (Creswell, 2021). However, this can lead to project delays and hinder meeting deadlines. Bias is an inherent concern when collecting primary data, as researchers may unintentionally influence participants’ responses. Etherington’s (2021) study revealed that a limited sample size can potentially result in an unrepresentative sample or a biased sample. Replicating research studies can be difficult, especially with primary data collection methods, as ensuring the same conditions across studies can be challenging, impeding comparisons across studies. Researchers must obtain informed consent, ensure confidentiality, and avoid any potential harm to protect participants’ interests.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Secondary Data
The use of secondary data in research has benefits and drawbacks. One advantage is its accessibility, which allows researchers to obtain data at a low cost or for free, without investing significant time or resources. Furthermore, secondary data can provide a large sample size, particularly useful in quantitative research, which can enhance the study’s statistical power and aid in detecting significant differences (Ruggiano and Perry, 2019). A broad range of sources, including government agencies, academic institutions, and commercial providers, offer secondary data. Additionally, historical analysis is possible using secondary data, enabling researchers to identify patterns and trends over time, which is valuable in social and economic research and analyzing the industry of Caterpillar Inc.
In addition, secondary data can serve as a means to validate the findings of primary data collection. Researchers can employ secondary data to either corroborate or disprove their research findings, which can improve the dependability and trustworthiness of their results. However, the use of secondary data has disadvantages, including potential data biases, limitations in the scope of data collected, lack of relevance to the specific research question, and difficulties in verifying data quality (Weston et al., 2019). For one, secondary data does not allow researchers to regulate how the data was collected and processed, which can result in inaccuracies or prejudices. Vega, Torres, and Martinez (2019) argued that secondary data can be out-of-date or unfinished, which can restrict its usefulness for certain research questions. For instance, if a researcher is investigating the impacts of a recent policy change, secondary data may fail to accurately reflect current events. Other issues related to secondary data are based on its quality, scope, and availability. Quality issues that arise with secondary data encompass missing data, discrepancies, or errors that can influence the credibility of research conclusions.
The accessibility of secondary data can be limited if the data is proprietary or not publicly available, which can pose challenges for researchers who require such data for their study. In terms of limited scope, secondary data may fail to cover all relevant variables or provide the necessary level of detail for a particular research question (Weston et al., 2019). Careful consideration of these limitations is essential when deciding between using primary data collection or secondary data sources. While primary data collection can offer detailed and specific information, it is time-consuming and expensive. On the other hand, secondary data, while not as tailored to the research question, can be obtained quickly and at a lower cost. Researchers should weigh the pros and cons of secondary data use before employing it in research.
Primary and Secondary Data on Caterpillar Inc.
Primary and secondary data can provide a comprehensive view of Caterpillar corporation. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations can be used to collect primary data on CAT. Surveys can be administered to customers, employees, and other stakeholders to gather feedback on products, reputation, and preferences. In addition, interviews with executives and managers can offer insights into the company’s strategy and goals. Following Etminani-Ghasrodashti et al.’s (2021) study, the use of focus groups can help understand customer or employee preferences and experiences. Observations at dealerships, construction sites, and other locations can provide valuable information on stakeholders’ behavior. While primary data provides specific and tailored information to the research question, it can be time-consuming and expensive to collect.
Secondary data sources can provide data on market trends, customer behavior, and competitors. Moreover, Caterpillar Inc.’s internal data, such as sales figures, customer feedback, and website analytics, can be used as a form of secondary data. The company’s financial performance, market share, and growth prospects can be obtained from its annual reports and financial statements. Additionally, industry reports from reputable market research firms and industry associations can provide valuable information about the construction and mining equipment industry, including market trends, opportunities, and threats (Zarubin et al., 2019). Additionally, to stay updated on the company’s activities, such as product launches, acquisitions, and partnerships, news articles from credible sources can be examined. Academic journals that publish research on the construction and mining equipment industry can offer insights into the most recent developments, technologies, and best practices. However, it is important to consider the limitations of both primary and secondary data.
Quantitative Measure
Several factors influence a company’s profitability, from employee engagement to customer satisfaction. Paais and Pattiruhu (2020) contended that engaged and motivated employees are more likely to perform well in their roles, resulting in increased profitability for the company. When employees are engaged, they are typically more committed to the organization’s goals, values, and mission. Similarly, highly engaged employees generate innovative ideas and approaches, which can drive growth and profitability. Chou et al. (2020) implied that motivated workers provide excellent customer service, leading to increased customer loyalty and retention. Additionally, engaged employees tend to have lower absenteeism and turnover rates, which can translate to cost savings for the company. The revenue of Caterpillar Inc. between 2012 and 2022, as shown in Table 1, can serve as an additional resource to assess the company’s productivity and performance.
Table 1: Caterpillar Inc. Annual Revenue
The mean of a company’s profits reflects the typical profit value for a given period. However, the mean alone may fail to provide a complete picture of a company’s profitability since it does not account for the variability of profits within that period. For example, Caterpillar Inc.’s mean between 2012 and 2022 is 51672. The profit may appear high, but some quarters had lower or higher profits as revealed in Table 2. For this reason, the standard deviation or range would be necessary to understand the variability in Caterpillar’s annual revenue. Additionally, other factors such as the company’s expenses, debt, and overall financial health should be considered in evaluating its profitability.
Mode: No mode
Table 2: Caterpillar Quarterly Revenue
The measure of standard deviation for a company’s profits quantifies the extent of variation of the profits around the mean. Therefore, the standard deviation of the data set in Table 1 will indicate the degree of spread of annual revenue values from the average. The standard deviation value from Table 1 indicates that the data set’s values are dispersed from the mean by approximately 7973 units. Moreover, some values in the data set, such as 65875, could be driving the standard deviation higher (see Table 1). The information can assist in making informed investment decisions and identifying potential avenues for improving the company’s operational and financial performance.
Management Information System
The utilization of management information systems (MIS) has become increasingly crucial for companies seeking to streamline operations and gain a competitive advantage. MIS offers a comprehensive approach to managing business processes and activities, which helps organizations attain their goals effectively (Endriyas et al., 2019). According to the technology acceptance model (TAM), the main factors that influence the willingness to adopt technology like MIS are perceived usefulness and ease of use (Salloum et al, 2019). The implementation of MIS allows organizations to establish policies and procedures, define roles and responsibilities, and set performance metrics. In relation to Endriyas et al.’s (2019) study, MIS aids in identifying and managing risks and opportunities, while providing a framework for capitalizing on opportunities for growth and advancement. Different industries have specific standards and regulations that companies must adhere to, and MIS can help organizations demonstrate compliance with these requirements.
Management Information Systems at Caterpillar Inc.
Caterpillar Inc. is a renowned multinational corporation specializing in the production and sales of heavy equipment, engines, and financial services. The company has adopted various MIS to support its business operations and decision-making processes. These systems are geared towards providing real-time data and analysis, enabling executives and managers to make informed decisions that enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and increase profitability (AboAbdo, Aldhoiena, and Al-Amrib, 2019; Baashar et al., 2020; Endriyas et al., 2019). Among the key MIS employed by CAT is an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. According to AboAbdo, Aldhoiena, and Al-Amrib (2019), an ERP system integrates various business functions, including finance, supply chain, manufacturing, and human resources management. Through this system, Caterpillar Inc. has a centralized database of information accessible to different departments, which promotes efficient and effective communication, ultimately driving growth and competitiveness.
Another MIS that Caterpillar Inc. uses is a Business Intelligence (BI) system. The BI system is designed to gather, store, and evaluate data from various sources, such as sales, production, and customer feedback. By leveraging the BI system, Caterpillar Inc. can generate real-time analytics and reports that enable managers to monitor crucial performance indicators and identify areas that need improvement. In addition to the BI system, Caterpillar Inc. utilizes a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system to manage its interactions with customers. With the CRM system, the company can track various customer interactions, including purchases, inquiries, and complaints (Baashar et al., 2020; Lubis et al., 2020). The system facilitates personalized and efficient customer service, which can increase customer loyalty and satisfaction.
Moreover, Caterpillar Inc. leverages the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) system, which is designed to manage the product development process from concept to production. Liu et al. (2020) provided evidence that through the PLM system, a company can track real-time data on product design, engineering, and testing. This enables managers to make informed decisions and improve product quality. Furthermore, Caterpillar Inc. uses a comprehensive supply chain management system to manage its global supply chain, including sourcing, procurement, logistics, and inventory management. The system provides visibility into the entire supply chain, enabling the company to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and enhance customer satisfaction. In addition to the PLM and supply chain management systems, Caterpillar Inc. utilizes a human resource management (HRM) system to manage its workforce. The HRM system is a centralized database that allows managers to track employee data, from recruitment to performance management (Garengo, Sardi, and Nudurupati, 2022). By utilizing the HRM system, Caterpillar Inc. can make informed decisions about workforce planning and optimize its human resources to maximize productivity.
Disadvantages of Management Information Systems
MIS can bring various benefits to a company, such as increased efficiency, improved decision-making, and better coordination of operations. However, if not implemented and managed correctly, MIS can have negative consequences. One significant challenge associated with MIS implementation is the cost (Wu et al., 2020). For large corporations like Caterpillar, the expenses of hardware, software, training, and maintenance can add up quickly and strain the company’s budget. Moreover, CAT relies heavily on technology for its operations, which makes technical problems such as data corruption and network outages a significant concern. Wolniak (2019) pointed out that these issues can lead to downtime and disrupt business operations, resulting in low productivity, reduced revenue, and customer dissatisfaction. Therefore, it is essential to assess the costs and benefits of the MIS system before implementation and ensure that the technology aligns with the company’s goals and needs.
Caterpillar’s MIS contains sensitive and confidential data, such as customer information and financial records. If the system is not adequately secured, it can be vulnerable to data breaches, hacking, and cyber-attacks. Such breaches can lead to financial losses and legal liabilities, negatively impacting CAT’s reputation and customer trust. Overreliance on automation within the system can result in errors, inaccuracies, and a lack of critical thinking and judgment (John et al., 2021). Implementing an MIS can require significant changes to the company’s culture, processes, and workflows. Consequently, some employees may resist the changes, particularly if they perceive the system as a threat to their job security, autonomy, or expertise. Additionally, the company’s MIS generates a large amount of data and reports, which can lead to information overload. According to Wu et al. (2020), this can make it difficult to identify market trends, challenges, and opportunities. Therefore, CAT must ensure that the system provides relevant and actionable insights and that the reports are tailored to the needs of the different stakeholders.
Selection of an Effective Management System
Choosing and implementing a management information system (MIS) is a crucial decision for any organization. The initial step in the process is to clearly define key business objectives. Essentially, this entails identifying the specific challenges that need to be addressed, outlining the goals of the MIS, and determining the anticipated benefits (AboAbdo, Aldhoiena, and Al-Amrib, 2019). The approach will aid in focusing the selection process and guarantee that the selected MIS aligns with the organization’s needs. After defining the business requirements, the organization should assess various MIS options. The step entails researching different systems and comparing features, capabilities, and costs to ultimately select the system that best fulfills the business needs (Garengo, Sardi, and Nudurupati, 2022; Lubis et al., 2020). Involving all relevant stakeholders in the selection and implementation process is critical to ensure successful implementation. Furthermore, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the financial feasibility of implementing an MIS. The analysis should include the costs associated with acquiring, installing, and maintaining the system and the potential benefits.
In addition, the organization should establish a clear implementation plan, which includes timelines, roles and responsibilities, training, and support. The implementation plan should be communicated to all relevant stakeholders to ensure that everyone is aware of the project’s progress and their role in the process. Wolniak (2019) asserted that compatibility with existing information technology (IT) infrastructure and systems is crucial to avoid technical issues and downtime. After selection and implementation, providing training to all relevant stakeholders on system use, data interpretation, and integration into daily operations is imperative for enhanced efficiency. Monitoring the system’s performance and evaluating its effectiveness through key performance indicators (KPIs), such as productivity, efficiency, and profitability, is necessary to identify areas for improvement (Endriyas et al., 2019; Lubis et al., 2020). Overall, following the steps for system implementation is crucial for the successful adoption and effective use of an MIS.
Reference List
AboAbdo, S., Aldhoiena, A. and Al-Amrib, H. (2019). ‘Implementing enterprise resource planning ERP system in a large construction company in KSA’, Procedia Computer Science, 164, pp.463-470. Web.
Afrizal, M.A.M. and Adi, B. (2020). ‘The influence of motivation and professional perception of a career in taxation of Feb students of PGRI Adi Buana University of Surabaya for a career in taxation’, International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 4(4). Web.
Baashar, Y. et al. (2020). ‘Customer relationship management systems (CRMS) in the healthcare environment: A systematic literature review’, Computer Standards & Interfaces, 71, p.103442. Web.
Bhardwaj, P. (2019). ‘Types of sampling in research’, Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 5(3), p.157. Web.
Busetto, L., Wick, W. and Gumbinger, C. (2020). ‘How to use and assess qualitative research methods’, Neurological Research and Practice, 2, pp.1-10. Web.
Chou, S.F. et al. (2020). ‘Identifying the critical factors of customer behavior: An integration perspective of marketing strategy and components of attitudes’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, p.102113. Web.
Creswell, J.W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Endriyas, M., et al. (2019). ‘Understanding performance data: Health management information system data accuracy in Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Region, Ethiopia’, BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), pp.1-6. Web.
Etherington, T.R. (2021). ‘Mahalanobis distances for ecological niche modeling and outlier detection: implications of sample size, error, and bias for selecting and parameterizing a multivariate location and scatter method’, PeerJ, 9, p.e11436. Web.
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. et al. (2021). ‘Integration of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) into existing transportation services: A focus group study’, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 12, p.100481. Web.
Garengo, P., Sardi, A. and Nudurupati, S.S. (2022). ‘Human resource management (HRM) in the performance measurement and management (PMM) domain: A bibliometric review’, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(7), pp.3056-3077. Web.
John, O. et al. (2021). ‘The 2020 WHO technical specifications for automated non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices with cuff’, Hypertension, 77(3), pp.806-812. Web.
Liu, X.L. et al. (2020). ‘Industrial blockchain-based framework for product lifecycle management in industry 4.0’, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 63, p.101897. Web.
Lubis, A. et al. (2020). ‘The influence of customer relationship management (CRM) indicators on customer loyalty of sharia-based banking system’, Lubis, A, pp.84-92. Web.
Macrotrends (n.d.). ‘Caterpillar revenue 2010-2022|CAT’, Macrotrends. Web.
Mohammed, A.I., Mohammed, Z.F. and Mohammad, H.A. (2022). ‘The effect of compensation management on employee performance: An empirical study in North Gas Company’, World Bulletin of Management and Law, 7, pp.59-70. Web.
Paais, M. and Pattiruhu, J.R. (2020). ‘Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance’, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), pp.577-588. Web.
Phillips, M. et al. (2019). ‘Comparing the information needs and experiences of undergraduate students and practicing engineers’, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), pp. 39-49. Web.
Romig, K. and Bryant, K. (2021). ‘A national paid leave program would help workers, families’, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 27. Web.
Ruggiano, N., and Perry, T. E. (2019). ‘Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how?’, Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), pp.81-97. Web.
Salloum, S.A. et al. (2019). ‘Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model’, IEEE Access, 7, pp.128445-128462. Web.
Stratton, S.J. (2021). ‘Population research: Convenience sampling strategies’, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 36(4), pp.373-374. Web.
Sweis, R.J. et al. (2019). ‘The effects of training and motivating employees on improving the performance of construction companies: The case of Jordan’, International Journal of Information, Business, and Management, 11(2), pp.179-211. Web.
Vega, R.D.L., Torres, N. and Martinez, A. (2019). ‘Technical challenges and approaches to build an open ecosystem of heterogeneous heritage collections’, Web.
Weston, S.J. et al. (2019). ‘Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets’, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), pp.214-227. Web.
Wolniak, R. (2019). ‘Downtime in the automotive industry production process–cause analysis’, Quality Innovation Prosperity, 23(2), pp.101-118. Web.
Wu, B. et al. (2020). ‘Battery digital twins: Perspectives on the fusion of models, data and artificial intelligence for smart battery management systems’, Energy and AI, 1, p.100016. Web.
Zarubin, M. et al. (2019). ‘Mining of mineral deposits’, The Dnipro University of Technology, 13(2), pp.91-102. Web.