Updated:

A Comparison Between China and the USA Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

A comparison between China and the USA is increasingly becoming tougher. Earlier, the major distinction used to be the fact that the US was the leading capitalist country, whereas China was a major communist bloc country.

After the bringing down of the iron curtain and the fast progress under globalization, this distinction has been reduced to that of degrees, with China all set to assume the role of leading economic power of the world. Hannon (2005) says that most discussions about the impact of globalization on Asian countries essentially center around one country, i.e., China.

Despite the fact that China had a difficult ideological history and its entrenched structures to stave off, it comfortably overtook other Asian countries in recording economic growth in the past decade and a half. In fact, most of the transition countries (erstwhile communist countries that are making a transition from communist politico-economic system to free-market economies), including communist giants such as Russia, look forward to emulating the transition model adopted by China.

“While strategies followed in much of the rest of the world paid little attention to institutions, to what I have called the organizational/social capital, China embarked on an evolutionary transition, which transformed much of the existing institutional structure”(Stiglitz,1998). As Hawkins (Centralization) says,” In recent publications, some Western scholars have used the term “decentralization” to describe the nature of evolutionary reform in different sectors of the country.”

In the US, the society is much more of a melting pot concept where international communities and cultures arrive, exit, and work on the basis of competitive skills. Chinese society, on the other hand, has always been a polarized society. There have been distinctions of class and caste which have been ingrained pretty deep in Chinese society for a long and since the Mongol Yuan Dynasty devised the discriminatory society in China, which divided people in China into four groups, in a caste-like system. It hardly needs stating that what China is and how it will develop is of major importance for all of us.

China is not only a culture that has contributed in different ways over a long period to world cultures but is today one of the most populous and potentially powerful countries in the world (Price, 1997). It was in present-day China that a brand new discriminating caste society was consciously built with an intended objective to ensure political control in human flows as well as economic exploitation.

The tool for economic exploitation was the so-called agri-industrial price scissor differential, namely, the peasants would surrender their grains to the government at a pre-fixed price. This caste society was crueler than the Indian caste system or South Africa’s apartheid in that babies, at birth, were predestined to be in the same caste of the mother and had no prospects of marrying outside of the caste (i.e., peasants) and therefore were locked in the consummative manner in the vicious circle. Since peasants don’t have the means of changing their status quo, they are destined to live in their caste not only for their lives but for generations.

The employment opportunities and the work avenues available under the free US system of capitalism were astounding. People moved through two to three major lifetime vocations before they retired. In China, the work and employment opportunities were highly restricted-particularly for the peasant class. The only possible chances of ’emancipation’ would be: 1) joining the army; 2) enrolling in colleges (but in that period, most could not get to go beyond junior high schools).

When they left their hometown villages, they would either wind up in the mines where they die in a cave-in or in deliberate setup (by which the mine owners cheat the insurance money out of the deaths), or in the sweatshops where they work for 12-16 hours per day for menial pay. Forever slaves and coolies, they were termed ‘mang liu,’ i.e., aimless drifters and the police could round them up at random and expel them from the cities and towns whenever a clean street is needed for celebrations of the national day and the like.

Where was the question for higher education for such people and their children? The social norms had reduced a major part of society to this state. It was the Cultural Revolution which seemed to take their cudgel. However, it was only chimerical as the Cultural Revolution came hopelessly mixed with the propagation of ideology and was more intent upon perpetuating the political will rather than improving a lot of proletariats. The social class structure, where the underprivileged was a majority, needed a much deeper treatment. It warranted the generation of economic activities for such people and raising of their income levels and standards of living.

Consider, for instance, how and through what exact process such lowly placed proletariats could ever have obtained ready political assessments for entry into higher education institutions. Essentially even Cultural Revolution bypassed them and ended by benefiting those who could obtain political assessments.

Because of the democracy and capitalism, the US federal system of the polity became easily accessible to highly aware US citizens, and the Federal facilities were systematized through a Federal structure where all citizens could avail of such facilities at the prevailing market rates or subsidized rates as the case may be. China’s communist governments tended to pay salaries and subsidies only to city dwellers. Some estimates reckon that China’s city dwellers, though numbering 20% or less, had cornered about 80% or more of consumption.

If political will perpetuated the socio-economic abrasion on such a large scale, where was a question of such strata ever aspiring for higher education? Instead, food and other basic necessities would be their desired objects. Official statistics in China regarding the unemployment rate never reckoned the peasants fully. Census data reveals that of about 1.3-1.5 billion Chinese, 70-80 percent of China’s population is peasants. Of these, some 20% of the Chinese peasants were unemployed, and that’s equivalent to 160-200 million peasants. And, this is still China’s status quo today even though Mao had been dead for 25 years (counting from 1976 to 2001).

Chinese society places considerable merit on academic achievements. The origin of this preference is often traced to Confucius, who advocated the necessity of the hierarchy of people and choosing rulers for the cause of societal discipline; however, his system was ‘based not on hereditary status but on individual merit’ (Ho, 1962, p.6). Confucius’ ideal society was a hierarchical society in which all had opportunities to access education and those excelling occupying the top echelons of the hierarchy (Ho, 1962).

References

Hannon, Brent. (2005).Asia lags west in most key aspects of globalization. The Asian Wall Street Journal, 2005.

Stiglitz, Joseph E.(1998). Second-Generation Strategies for Reform for China. Speech at Beijing University, Beijing, China, 1998

Hawkins, John N..Centralization, Decentralization, Recentralization: Educational Reform in China. Journal of Education Administration. 38 (5):442-454.

Price, R.F. (1997). Social justice and education in China. In T.J. Scrase (ed.). Social Justice and Third World Education (pp. 163–180). New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Ho, P. T. (1962). The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368-1911. New York: Columbia University Press.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2021, September 16). A Comparison Between China and the USA. https://ivypanda.com/essays/a-comparison-between-china-and-the-usa/

Work Cited

"A Comparison Between China and the USA." IvyPanda, 16 Sept. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/a-comparison-between-china-and-the-usa/.

References

IvyPanda. (2021) 'A Comparison Between China and the USA'. 16 September.

References

IvyPanda. 2021. "A Comparison Between China and the USA." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/a-comparison-between-china-and-the-usa/.

1. IvyPanda. "A Comparison Between China and the USA." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/a-comparison-between-china-and-the-usa/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "A Comparison Between China and the USA." September 16, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/a-comparison-between-china-and-the-usa/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1