A graduate researcher’s bias is one of the most important aspects to consider when conducting scientific work. Elimination of this aspect is valuable, as it helps to achieve the most productive and effective results. This is due to the fact that the definition of bias helps to limit the occurrence of problems with obtaining information and forming the opinion of researchers. Another aspect that is associated with dissertation research is the definition of limits. Following this step helps to identify possible difficulties that may arise with the methodology, literature, or finding and result of an academic paper. Thus, this discussion aims to study the meaning of bias and limits in graduate research and identify ways to minimize the occurrence of these problems.
Thus, first of all, this work will consider bias as a critical aspect of scientific work. Sources note that “a study is appropriately powered when there is a high likelihood that it will detect a genuine empirical effect” (Ioannidis et al., 2017, p. 239). Thus, the definition of any doubts that may appear helps to bring credibility and objectivity to the study. Other scientific papers claim that “recognizing and understanding research bias is crucial for determining the utility of study results and an essential aspect of evidence-based decision-making” (Galdas, 2017, p. 1). Moreover, it is worth remembering that any study carries a certain degree of bias. It is this factor that determines the need to find ways that will help limit the possibility of their negative impact on work.
In dissertation research, it is crucial to define the limits that are an integral part of academic work. Their value for a future scientific paper is that they identify methodological shortcomings that may affect the interpretation of the collected and analyzed information (Ross & Bibler Zaidi, 2019; Theofanidis, D., & Fountouki, 2018). The definition of this aspect determines what further conclusions the researchers will draw regarding the results and findings. Future work will conduct research based on the Routine Activity Theory Framework. The basis of this theory is the notion that a crime can be committed by absolutely anyone if there is an opportunity and appropriate circumstances for this (Clarke & Felson, 2017). The main limitation, in this case, is that criminals are most often able to make informed decisions and not commit punishable activities at any opportunity.
It is necessary to identify ways to reduce the possibility of severe bias and limitations of the research. The most important way is to use objective, evidence-based sources that provide different points of view on the problem. Thus, researchers will be able to independently form an attitude to the problem. Moreover, it is necessary to clearly define the issues and hypotheses of the research and the division of responsibilities for the analysis of information between the participants of the ongoing scientific work.
To eliminate the large number of limitations in the study, it is crucial to study in detail and in-depth the approaches that can be used to collect information. Moreover, it is essential to consider how the chosen framework will affect the interpretation of the data obtained since all of these aspects will contribute to the effectiveness of the study. Therefore, despite the fact that bias and limitations cannot be avoided when conducting dissertation work, there are approaches that help prevent their negative impact.
The study of the issue of bias and limits should be carried out, taking into account different points of view. This circumstance is due to the fact that these are complex phenomena that occupy an important place in scientific research. Thus, analyzing someone else’s point of view will help better to form an opinion about the problem under discussion. Moreover, carrying out this kind of work will be an effective way to find more approaches and methods to reduce the possibility of bias and limits in graduate research.
First of all, the post under study mentions that bias and limits are becoming a threat to the validity of the study, which one cannot disagree with. Additionally, it is worth supporting statements that these aspects can arise at any stage of academic work, regardless of design, methods, or paradigms (Yarborough, 2021). It is worth noting that the advantage of this post also lies in the fact that it cites various types of bias that may arise during the study.
Regarding limitations, this post also provides a full justification for the importance of taking them into account in the study. Consequently, qualitative research cannot be generalized, and experimental quantitative methods may suffer reactive effects that threaten result validity. In addition, a full-fledged justification of what limitations may arise in the author’s scientific work is given. This factor will contribute to the most effective and efficient dissertation work. In conclusion, the author provided ways that can be used to avoid issues related to bias and limits. Hence, the main one is the belief that there is a correspondence between research issues and research methods in the work. In addition, it is vital that the limitation and biases are defined at the very beginning of the study to limit adverse outcomes.
References
Clarke, R. V., & Felson, M. (2017). Routine activity and rational choice. Routledge.
Galdas, P. (2017). Revisiting bias in qualitative research: Reflections on its relationship with funding and impact.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). Web.
Ioannidis, J. P., Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2017). The power of bias in economics research. The Economic Journal, 127(605), 236-265. Web.
Ross, P. T., & Bibler Zaidi, N. L. (2019). Limited by our limitations. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(4), 261-264. Web.
Theofanidis, D., & Fountouki, A. (2018). Limitations and delimitations in the research process. Perioperative Nursing-Quarterly Scientific, Online Official Journal of GORNA, 7(3), 155-163. Web.
Yarborough, M. (2021). Moving towards less biased research. BMJ Open Science, 5(1). Web.