A mixed-method in research suggests combining the qualitative and quantitative approach to conduct a comprehensive and all-embracive data analysis. However, since it also incorporates the disadvantages thereof, the quality of data must remain the key focus. When conducting mixed-method research, one must be aware of the fact that the efficacy of the data collection process hinges on how research participants interpret information when taking part in a study. The rise in information subjectivity may lead to a drop in inference quality of the research results, therefore, jeopardizing the validity of study outcomes to a considerable extent. Similarly, the credibility and validity of the outcomes will be reduced significantly. In nixed research, it is important to address both qualitative and quantitative validity. In other words, both quantitative changes and changes in participants” attitudes must be examined. The specified effect can also be attributed to the extent to which a researcher interprets obtained data correctly.
To collect quantitative data, a survey will be used. The identified tool will help measure the effects of using technology in an ESL classroom setting. A survey allows gathering succinct information and arranging it for its further usage and analysis. Therefore, a survey will become a crucial method of collecting information.
To collect qualitative data, an interview will be utilized. It is expected that the survey will not cover all issues related to the topic of the research. Thus, the interview will become the extension of the survey. Thus, it will fill the blank areas that will be left after the interview is conducted. The interview will offer an in-depth exploration of the effects of technology in an ESL classroom context. Thus, the two tools will complement each other.