The questions of sexuality and gender are being positioned as urgent as the problems of discrimination by race. People who are LGBTQ, which stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer or questioning, face unfairness in social structures worldwide, as only numerous developed countries have adopted appropriate policies. This essay will put forward the arguments for advocacy for underrepresented or subordinate groups addressing relevant evidence. Moreover, the effects and importance on different social levels will be considered.
People possessing non-traditional sexuality used to be considered psychically ill, and in some countries, this tendency is still present. Despite this fact, scientific evidence, including several medical studies, has shown that homosexuality should not be considered unhealthy (Kinney 365). Another myth about LGBTQ people is that they have some gene faulty for their unconventional feeling of self-identification. Gene therapists do not entirely deny the possibility of its existence. However, there is no evidence for genetics being the reason for sexual, emotional, or physical attraction to individuals of the same gender or sex assigned differently from biological (Kinney 375). As a result, scientific data and conclusions suggest that being LGBTQ is usual and does not mean having mental diseases.
Furthermore, the religious reasoning of the hatred towards the mentioned social group is controversial. There are advanced religious organizations wthathave adopted some rules and incentives for the treatment of LGBTQ people, welcoming them in spite of their non-traditional background (Coley 88). As a matter of fact, they are using sacred books based on their faith, which means that it is possible to overcome the stigma and accept LGBTQ people equally.
Subsequently, this underrepresented social group differs from the rest of society only by its sexuality preferences. It means that there is no ground for violating the fundamental human rights of the mentioned individuals. They have the power to fully enjoy their freedoms entitled by the fact of their births without social pressure and accusation. On the individual level, nobody is privileged to bully LGBTQ people at any social institution. Moreover, the subjects of the threats should have and use their opportunities to be protected by law enforcement organizations. Finally, support for the time being, until the discrimination by the sexuality traits is eliminated, is how everyone can help.
The anti-LGBTQ propaganda, including media and entertainment, should be inclined to more liberal politics at the community level. These tools for shaping the public mind are the source of harm to the underrepresented groups’ mental health and self-esteem. If the paradigm changes to a more inclusive character, its members’ unity and well-being will be improved. Therefore, the level of life satisfaction increases, which is undoubtedly a positive trend for the nation.
As mentioned above, LGBTQ people’s rights are not respected in the vast majority of countries. Some governments neglect the problem, while others severely violate moral regulations. The advocacy for the underrepresented or subordinate groups is of paramount importance as discrimination based on sexual characteristics is the reason for many people’s sufferin. It is one of the actual problems positioned ahead of future human development.
To conclude, advocacy for LgGBTQ people is essential for the social development of the world society. Both science and religion suggest that this underrepresented group has the right to be accepted in the world community and enjoy equality on the same level as others. The importance of adopting some vital regulations that eliminate unfair and immoral treatment is crucial for individuals, societies, and nations.
References
Coley, Jonathan. “Reconciling Religion and LGBT Rights: Christian Universities, Theological Orientations, and LGBT Inclusion.” Social Current, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, pp. 87-106.
Kinney, Robert. “Homosexuality and Scientific Evidence: On Suspect Anecdotes, Antiquated Data, and Broad Generalizations.” The Linacre Quarterly, vol. 82, no. 4, 2015, pp. 364-390.