An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8 Essay (Critical Writing)

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Introduction

Mathew underlines the Pharisaic antagonism directed to Jesus by forwarding his case to the Pharisees regarding the adherence of the Sabbath provisions (New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8). The Pharisees accused Jesus and His disciples of unlawful undertakings on the Sabbath after they plucked and feasted on the ears of corn. The move showed the opposition Jesus faced in His endeavors of spreading the Gospel as manifested by the confrontation emerging from the Pharisaic authorities. In this regard, this paper seeks to reveal Mathew’s stress that necessity does not overshadow percept through his characterization of Jesus as authoritative in the book.

Meaning of the Text

A correct comprehension of the passage related by Mathew portrays that Jesus was not demonstrating that necessity overshadows percept. Instead, Jesus acted in defense of His disciples from the unjust confrontation as he simultaneously questioned the motives of the hypocritical Pharisees.

Firstly, Mathew relates that as Jesus passed through the cornfields on a Sabbath, his disciples felt hungry and plucked the grain heads before eating (12:1). However, this act by the disciples did not infringe on the laws of the land by then as eating was allowed under the Law of Moses (Deut. 23:25). Thus, the law provides clearly that necessity could not dominate perceptions regarding the Sabbath since it was unlawful to eat corn under that Law of Moses.

Secondly, Jesus uses his authority to defend his disciples’ actions regarding their activities on a Sabbath by revealing the ill motives of the Pharisee’s condemnation (Matt. 3-4). In His defensive approach, Jesus talked of the instance when David and those with him became hungry on a Sabbath (1 Samuel 21:1-6). In this regard, the inconsistent application of the law revealed the Pharisees’ ill intentions towards Jesus and His disciples. A manifestation of the motive appeared later as the Pharisees plotted the destruction of Jesus (Matt. 12:14). Afterward, Jesus criticized the Pharisees’ twisted understanding of the concept of working on the Sabbath (Matt. 12:5) by describing the priests as blameless as well since they engaged in lawful acts, not because necessity overpowers percept. Therefore, the unkind motives of the Pharisees reveal that the confrontation concerning eating the corn on a Sabbath was just an approach to undermine the authority of Jesus.

Finally, Jesus proceeded to declare his authority by saying “I tell you, something greater than the temple is here.” (Matt. 12: 6). By declaring so, Jesus underscored that he was the Messiah with authority. Moreover, His authority was emphasized in the book of Mathew as Jesus told the Pharisees, “For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath” (Matt. 12:8). Therefore, an accurate exegesis of Mathew’s text reveals that attacks emanating from the Pharisees to the disciples emanated from malicious intentions. It should be noted that entirely in the book of Mathew, he demonstrates that Jesus is Lord, implying that his authority ought to gain respect among the multitudes.

Literary Function of the Text

The text written by Mathew possesses literary functions that unearth the different perspectives regarding law application. Further, Mathew reveals the different motives that authorities could possess in their law enforcement endeavors as seen by the envious and impure hearts of the Pharisees. Additionally, Mathew utilizes literary skills that link Jesus’ experiences concerning the Sabbath law with past events with similar contexts thereby exposing the issue of necessity overshadowing percept.

For this reason, intertexture analysis of the text written by Mathew reveals similar episodes in the Bible where individuals disregarded the teachings of the Scriptures owing to unique circumstances that necessitated “breaking” the law. Therefore, the disciples acted in line with the provisions of God’s laws, but they infringed on the Pharisees’ misinterpretation of the law. In condemning the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, Jesus considered his disciples as “guiltless” (Matt. 12: 7) because, in essence, they had not done anything wrong according to the laws of God. Besides, Jesus emphasized that it is wrong to condemn the ‘guiltless” based on a tortured interpretation of the law (Matt. 12:7). Thus, the text underlined the essence of radicalism in a bid to overcome rigid and traditional perceptions. In this respect, Mathew reveals that the law should act in favor of the people instead of the converse. Mark echoes this aspect by relaying Jesus’ sentiments that “The Sabbath was made for humankind and not humankind for the Sabbath” (Mark: 2:27).

Mathew’s Characterization of Jesus in the Text

Mathew depicts Jesus as a figure that consciously challenges the Scripture experts by making them remember and then properly comprehends the text included in the Scripture. In this case, Mathew depicts Jesus as an individual concerned with the level through which the authorities understand the law that they purpose to implement on the subjects. In so doing, Jesus delivered His teachings not as an alternative for Torah, but for the sake of unearthing God’s character of mercy, love, and generosity. For this reason, Mathew portrays Jesus’ character as one that seeks to reinterpret or redefine the Torah in a manner that shows that inevitability should not dominate perceptions regarding the law.

Further, Matthew associated the character of Jesus with authority. Through necessity, Jesus introduced a new manner of spirituality and living aimed at carrying Israel beyond the temple’s demise. As a result, Jesus’ authority was perceived as a direct threat to Pharisaic claims pertaining to authority among the people. Additionally, Mathew intended to reveal that Jesus had control over the law by claiming his sovereignty over the law (Matt. 12:8) since he was not held in bondage like the Jews for disregarding the Sabbath. In this regard, the disciples’ plucking of the grain was not only associated with necessity triggered by human need but also the authority of Jesus over the Sabbath.

Mathew unmasks the character of Jesus as one that embraces radicalism. During Jesus’ time, the Roman Empire presented enormous challenges denoted by urbanization, militarization, and commercialization. However, amid the changes, the Pharisees stayed rigid to the changes as they embraced conservativeness thereby undermining their ability to embrace change. However, through His authority, Jesus brought radicalism to the Pharisees by stamping his authority on the law concerning the Sabbath issue. In this case, the character of Jesus envisioned the coming of the post-Herodian world that would worship God in a higher place than the earthly temple Matt. 12:6).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the capitalistic society today could relate to Mathew’s text regarding the Sabbath as more business enterprises open on sacred days with the aim of accumulating profits. In this case, necessity could be perceived to dominate religious teachings thereby triggering authorities to consider the practice as unlawful thereby creating controversy. Additionally, Mathew reveals that the authorities could apply the law based on bias or malicious intentions in a bid to secure their stakes. Similarly, the Pharisees’, the objective ought to protect God’s blessings through the authoritative adherence to the Torah interpretation. However, they ended up restricting people from the presence of God. Accordingly, bureaucracy is usually guilty of inhibiting individuals from benefiting an organization to the maximum of their potential. Moreover, strategies have a legal place but one ought not to forget that eventually, individuals are the strategy.

Works Cited

New Revised Standard Version. Ed. Bruce Metzger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, February 20). An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8. https://ivypanda.com/essays/an-exegesis-of-mathew-in-new-revised-standard-version-matt-121-8/

Work Cited

"An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8." IvyPanda, 20 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/an-exegesis-of-mathew-in-new-revised-standard-version-matt-121-8/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8'. 20 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8." February 20, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/an-exegesis-of-mathew-in-new-revised-standard-version-matt-121-8/.

1. IvyPanda. "An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8." February 20, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/an-exegesis-of-mathew-in-new-revised-standard-version-matt-121-8/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "An Exegesis of Mathew in New Revised Standard Version, Matt. 12:1-8." February 20, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/an-exegesis-of-mathew-in-new-revised-standard-version-matt-121-8/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1