Introduction
The funeral industry is commonly discussed due to various procedures, including restoration and embalming. The two are depicted in Jessica Mitford’s text Embalming Mr. Jones, where she demonstrates a biased attitude towards the deed. Understandably, even biased texts can affect a person’s perspective. In the following essay, I will explain whether my opinion on the funeral industry has changed because of the text.
Personal Attitude to the Funeral Industry Before and After the Reading
My perspective on this occupation has always been neutral, as I prefer to neither praise nor judge something I do not know much about sufficiently. Having read Mitford’s text, I must admit that my opinion of the industry has been affected. For example, on the first page of the text, Mitford accentuates that embalming is normalized in the US and Canada despite it being practiced only in these locations (Mitford 1).
Another point that she makes is that the relatives are not asked for their consent on the matter. This accentuates how one’s agreement to the deed was not considered for some procedures. It is one of the most concerning parts of the industry, and it was prevalent and accepted back then.
The writer depicts the procedure with slight hints of irony. This attitude is strengthened by the second page, as she reminds the reader of the subject of consent and depicts the restoration part of the procedure. This depiction draws attention to humanity’s fear of death and reluctance to acknowledge it, even in gruesome cases (Mitford 2). This is a rather important point in this work, which I strongly support.
Besides, the text made me think of how people would rather have their bodies look normal despite acknowledging the tragedy of their abrupt passing. Such a desire is understandable; however, it shows how the industry complies with people’s ignorance. This, in turn, erases the impact of the tragedy, whether it be drowning or decapitation. Thus, the text made me realize that the funeral industry obeys people’s desire for escapism, even when insensitive and inappropriate.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Mitford’s text is severely biased towards the funeral industry. The opinion presented in Embalming Mr. Jones has affected my perspective on the field. It made me realize how some procedures are performed without consent while being normalized. Moreover, it demonstrated how people apply ignorance to the tragic passing of the deceased, and the industry complies with it, erasing the uncomfortable visual signs for the former.
Work Cited
Mitford, Jessica. Embalming Mr. Jones.