Updated:

Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada Coursework

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda® Made by Human No AI

Heading of the case

The case was provided between the Attorney General of Quebec – an appellant v. the Attorney General of Canada – a respondent with Laskin C.J. and Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer and Wilson J.J. present. It was devoted to appeal to the court about regarding unconstitutional the veto set on the agreement between Canada and nine other provinces.

Facts held during the court trial

The case began on April 7, 1982. The appeal was directed at considering the veto set on the First Reference, by the Quebec Court of Appeal. The appeal is considered to be legal according to “s. 37 of the Supreme Court Act and s. 1 of An Act respecting a reference of the court of appeal”. The reason for the appeal was the agreement that took place on November 5, 1981, between the Government of Canada and eight other provinces. On November 18, 1981, the draft of the agreement was ready. The Government of Quebec expressed its formal disagreement with the proposed draft of the resolution. It means that the Government of Quebec formally vetoed the Resolution.

Issue

The question which was presented in the Court of Appeal is whether the consent of the Province of Quebec constitutionally required by convention for the adoption by the Senate and the House of Commons of Canada of Resolution the purpose of which is to cause the Canadian Constitution to be amended in such manner as to affect:

  1. the legislative competence of the Legislature of the Province of Quebec in virtue of the Canadian Constitution
  2. the status or role of the Legislature or Government of the Province of Quebec within the Canadian federation and does the objection of the Province of Quebec render the adoption of such resolution unconstitutional in the conventional sense.

Judgment

The answer of the Court of Appeal to the question was negative. The notions used in the decision were similar to those which were used when the decision by the Quebec Court of Appeal was provided.

Holding

Under the Canada Act 1982, two additional submissions (law), and the decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal, the negative answer to the appeal was accepted.

Ratio Decidendi

It was concluded that the decision of the Court of Appeal was not the subject matter for the discussion in another Court of Appeal.

Reasoning

The court made a resolve because of a number of reasons. First, when the decision was made by the Quebec Court of Appeal, not one person but a number of people did it. There were two submissions that directed the Court’s decision. The first one was “convention requiring the unanimous consent of the ten provinces to any constitutional amendment of the type in issue” and the second one was the fact that Quebec had a right to veto any constitutional amendment which was aimed at affecting the legislative side of the Province.

Dissenting/Concurring Opinion

According to the opposite opinion, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms presented in the Canada Act 1982 (one of the arguments in the court) is not identical to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. That is why it may be concluded that the amendments of the Constitution of Canada differ greatly from the amending of the First Reference.

Reference

Reference re: Amendment to the Canadian Constitution, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 791.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, March 21). Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada. https://ivypanda.com/essays/appeal-of-quebec-concerning-the-constitution-of-canada/

Work Cited

"Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada." IvyPanda, 21 Mar. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/appeal-of-quebec-concerning-the-constitution-of-canada/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada'. 21 March.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/appeal-of-quebec-concerning-the-constitution-of-canada/.

1. IvyPanda. "Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/appeal-of-quebec-concerning-the-constitution-of-canada/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Appeal of Quebec Concerning the Constitution of Canada." March 21, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/appeal-of-quebec-concerning-the-constitution-of-canada/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
No AI was involved: only quilified experts contributed.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment
1 / 1