Home Firearms in McDonald v. Chicago Court Case
The decision of the Supreme Court stated that the issue of self-defense and the right to possess and bear firearms might be reviewed at a state level.
Constitutional Law Essay Examples and Topics
How to Write an Outline for an Essay on Administrative Law
Essays on Administrative Law may have subjects ranging from constitutional law to transport regulation. Knowing how to use the structure of your paper to your convenience gives you an advantage over other essay-writers.
Apart from achieving an in-depth understanding of the subject that you are writing about, here are some ideas to help you begin your essay:
Tip #1
Research and write down the books that you feel will help you write an excellent essay. Use them as the starting basis for your bibliography to give your writing sufficient credibility.
Reading even a little bit on any of your assigned administrative law essay topics will help you get some understanding of how literature can help you structure your argument and support your case’s theme.
Tip #2
Brainstorm your ideas after you have done your research and give attention to how you can split your essay up into subheadings, especially if it promises to be lengthy. Using an approach of “administrative law questions and answers” may help get your thoughts in order.
Tip #3
Focus on your subject and remove any subtopics that do not help you build your central argument. For example, if you are writing tribunals essays, ask yourself whether the inclusion of a description of other types of courts advances your thesis statement.
Remember, an excellent piece of writing is one that stays on topic in every paragraph!
Tip #4
Write down some variations of administrative law essay titles for your work, and think about which one works best and why. Ask yourself which title allows your readers to gauge both your stance on the subject and the methods you will use.
Get more tips and starter ideas at IvyPanda!
US Supreme Court’s Ideological Tendencies
Political views are considered to be one of the key factors when the question is about the role of the politics in the decisions of the US Supreme Court.
Parliamentary Sovereignty in the United Kingdom
10 As deduced from the definition of the sovereignty of the parliament, it is clear that the lack of the codified constitution in the U.K.has given the emphasis on the doctrine of the parliamentary supremacy.
Regulating Law Enforcement and Intelligence
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is one of the regulations that significantly affect both law enforcement and intelligence gathering in the country.
The United States Constitution and Criminal Justice
The legal principle called the Exclusionary Rule is the result of the Supreme Court interpretation of the constitutional right of the United States citizens to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. United States
The decision of the courts could have been because the executive lied to the public, and there was every right to make the public aware of this fact.
Miranda Warnings in the United States
The Miranda Rights comprise a significant part of the law enforcement system in the United States of America. The full text of Miranda Rights sounds as follows: "You have the right to remain silent.
Obergefell v. Hodge: Supreme Court Case
Hodges is one of the most significant cases of the US Supreme Court, in which the Court ruled that marriage equality is a fundamental right of the citizens guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the [...]
Natural and Positive Law
The early theorists of natural law were of the view that natural law is the command of God and it was to be obeyed even in instances when its obedience caused injustice.
Sexual Harassment Dispute
This paper will analyze the main facts of this case and the goals of the parties that were involved in it.
Whistleblowing Features and Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Tye managed to show the public that the application of the order in the way the data was being collected and retained would violate the rights of the US citizens.
People with Disabilities: Local and a Federal Law’ Regulation
To be more exact, the current standards need to be shaped so that the policy in question should not affect the social perception of people with physical or mental disabilities.
Legislature and Judiciary Integration – Canadian Law
The judiciary assumes the role of interpreting the wording in statutes to bring out the context of the same and the intention of the legislature with regard to the various situations in which the statute [...]
Health Inequities in Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital
The federal government interpreted the law to support the position of Black professionals and patients. The government concurred that it was unconstitutional to use federal funds in a discriminatory way.
Reasons Why Britain needs a Written Constitution
According to Thompson, Britain is a prominent country in the European region, and in the whole world. A written constitution would, however, ensure the influence of lawmakers is kept in check and that avenues of [...]
Brown vs. Plata Case and Supreme Court’s Decision
The Court's decision, in this respect, reflected the willingness of the majority of Judges to confirm that the provisions of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S.
The Voting Rights Act and Racial Discrimination
However, the very nature of a constitution as a legal document implies that its main aim is to outline the most important underlying concepts and principles that the society should be guided by.
Uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom
According to Oxford Dictionary of law, "constitution" is defined as "the rules and practices that determine the composition and functions of the organs of central and local government in a state and regulate the relationship [...]
Should Australia Adopt a Bill of Rights?
Victorian Charter of Human Rights/Responsibility Act of 2006 is important, because it addresses the following."By drawing the nexus between policies and practices with human rights standards, the Charter becomes a powerful tool that changes the [...]
The US Farm Bill
Nadine Lehrer, who has been studying the bill, asserts, "The bill was developed in the wake of 1930's farm crisis to bring farm incomes up to the par with the required minimum incomes".
The Necessity to Change the Affirmative Action Laws
The currency of the topic about the necessity, possibilities, and advantages of changing the affirmative action laws is based on such reasons as the importance of exploring the public's views on the problem and on [...]
First Amendment in Modern US Justice
Also, the paper discusses the significance of the verdict passed by the Supreme Court in each case and their relevance or influence on the rights of American citizens today.
Ballot Initiative in the 13th Amendment
The pros of the process are in the fact the ballot initiative is the direct reflection of the democratic principles in society when voters can pass laws and make decisions which the legislature cannot address.
US Constitutional Amendments: Procedures Changes
Of all the American amendments implemented, the model of the amendments has been taken one of these routes: where two-thirds of the members of the senate and the house approve the proposal for the given [...]
The State of Confusion and Tanya Trucker’s Lawsuit
Of profound significance is the fact that Tanya is a resident of the State of Denial. Mostly Tanya's trucks ferry products to the State of Confusion, therefore, an augmentation in the current expenditure due to [...]
The Constitution of China: the Shaanxi Province Position
Thus, in spite of the fact Shaanxi Province was discussed during a long period of time as the centre of the conservative and revolutionary communistic forces in the country, today the governmental representatives of Shaanxi [...]
Assault Weapons Should Be Banned
On the other hand, proponents of the ban argue that assault weapons encourage crime and misuse of weapons. They argue that America is a democratic country and the right of the people to carry weapons [...]
The Defamation Law in the UAE
The defamation law should be amended to accommodate the diversity of the UAE. In the first case, the Canadian woman is guilty of defamation and the Dubai Court of Misdemeanours acted appropriately by charging her [...]
Freedom of Speech: Julian Assange and WikiLeaks’ Case
Another significant issue is that the precedent of WikiLeaks questions the power of traditional journalism to articulate the needs of the society and to monitor the governments.
Abortion Incidence in the United State
This decision removed most of the legal obstacles to abortion, and it led to the dramatic increase in the availability of safe abortion services in the US.
Immigration, Voting and Naturalization Laws
That is why, the combination of all these people, their beliefs and points of view led to the appearance of a great number of approaches towards the issue of human rights and the main idea [...]
Land Law for Joint Tenants
Parties to the agreement do not have the right to turn out one of the tenants. Ultimately, the last survivor in the joint tenancy becomes the sole owner of the property having acquired all the [...]
Illegal Immigration as a Major Problem for the USA
However, when it comes to defining the factors contributing to the growth of the unemployment rates among the local population, not only the growth of the number of immigrants, but also the quality of the [...]
Lottery Wars
Since lotteries are authorized forms of gambling, more and more people are likely to develop the addiction. Recent scandals and instances of corruption suggest that lotteries are still seen as a way to make money.
The U.S. Constitution: Protection of Rights and Vagueness
The premises for the provision of rights to every single denizen of the U.S.population can be viewed as the key asset of the Constitution.
Changes in Laws of Marijuana Regulation
In addition, the study intends to uncover the impacts of the said laws and the accompanying changes. The case studies will be compared to assess the impacts of legislations on marijuana in the society.
Civil Rights Importance Theories
Critical race theory and the theory of three generations are some of the theories that elucidate on the significance and generations of civil rights.
Children’s Rights Concept
The implication is that cultural variation a round sex and sexuality can be integrated into the United Nations conventions on the rights of a child by the introduction of universal sexuality education to all nations.
Internet Piracy and Stop Online Piracy Act in the US
At the end of it all, internet piracy will hurt the same people who are profiting from it because they will have fewer materials to sell or distribute in the future.
Brazil’s Legal System
One of the systems is controlled by the state while the federal judiciary system binds all states, and is applied in the whole country.
US Constitution: Amendments, Agreements, Compromises
The major agreement and compromises that were mainly discussed in the US constitution were the issue of slavery, and the content of the legislature.
Conflict Over Human Rights
The following discussion is a description concerning the conflicts between Iran and the United States in the promotion of human rights some violations of human rights by Iran, such as abuse of the captives.
Arizona Immigration Laws
Currently, the issue of illegal immigration in the USA heavily dominates USA political forum, the Congress body and even the policy agenda in the federal government and even the states' government.
Amendment Four in the US Bill of Rights
The fourth amendment in the United States of America Constitution is the section of the Bill of Rights that protects all US citizens against unfair searches, confiscations, and arrests.
Marijuana Legalization in Illinois
The case for legalization of marijuana in Colorado evidences the need to alter federal laws prohibiting marijuana for its legalization law to have both statutory and federal backing in the state of Illinois.
The Bill of Rights and It’s Importance
Each of the amendments included in this list is critical for limiting the authority of the state. This is one of the reasons why I attach much importance to this amendment that regulates the interactions [...]
Nonviolence Civil Rights
In any case, nonviolence formed a basis for the understanding of the civil rights movement by the oppressors. Also, nonviolence was inclusive and allowed the average citizen to participate in the civil rights movement.
Censorship Impacts on Civil Liberties
In the US, the First Amendment guarantees the freedom of expression; it is one of the main democratic rights and freedoms.
National Security Versus Personal Privacy
With considerations of the security systems put forth by the US security agencies, drastic changes have taken place, affecting individual personal privacy for the American citizens with the aim of countering terrorism in the US [...]
Concept of Title VII – Constitutional Law
The president sent a bill to the House of Representatives where further amendments strengthened the bill to include provisions on the protection against racial discrimination in the workplace and incorporation of all the rights described [...]
Legalizing Gay Marriage in the US
If anything is to go by, the foundations of gay marriage uphold the belief that couples who have shown the purpose for their commitment should take to the aisle and commit their pledge before the [...]
The Fourteenth Amendment – Constitutional Law
The second section of the Amendment allowed for the repeal of the three-fifths clause of the original Constitution that reckoned slaves as a three-fifths of a person with respect to the apportionment of Congressional representation.
The Choice to Buy a Gun for Single Women
The number of single women is also on the rise. Single women should consider the caliber, size, and type before buying a firearm.
Civil Law: Is Breaking the Law Necessary?
He notes that "If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go.but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent [...]
Drug Legalization and Intellectual Horizons
One of the reasons why the issue of drug legalization continues to spark up a public controversy in America, is that the representatives of the country's so-called amoral majority' are still being in the position [...]
Affirmative Action Law in the USA
In the United States, the law should increase the number of women in the senior managerial and leadership positions by solving the shortcomings that describe their history.
The Marijuana Usage Legislation
This research paper is aimed at discussing the effects that can be produced by the changes in the legislation on the use, storage, and distribution of marihuana.
Law: Native Women’s Association of Canada v. Canada
The decision made by the court was based on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the court decided against the claim of the Native Women's Association of Canada.
Is it Never Permissible to Break the Law?
Since the very existence of the society is based on compliance with a specific set of regulations, breaking the law must never be regarded as a permissible action; however, the ethical implications that a certain [...]
The Constitution, Social Rights, and Liberal Political Justification
Also, the critique investigates research designs and conceptualized results, which are quantifiable and assess the same in terms of relevance in the present application of the law.
The Equal Rights in the U.S. Constitution
In the first part of the article, the authors present the history of the debates on the topic, highlighting the main ideas expressed in favor and against of the ERA ratification in the U.S.
Victims’ Rights and Vengeance
The allowance of victims' impact statement in the form of video in court proceedings is real evidence for the determination to promote rights.
The U.S. Constitution: Fifth Amendment
While the Fifth Amendment applies to the rights of the accused to an attorney during interrogation, the Sixth Amendment is applicable after the indictment.
Employment Law Applications: Public and Private Sector
This paper analyzes the differences that exist between the public sector and the private sector. The government, through the legislature, does the work of formulating laws that guide the private and the public sector.
Administrative Law: the HP Accounting Case
The parties are allowed to appeal the decision of the Federal Court to the Federal Court of Appeal. All citizens are entitled to appeal and review of the tribunal decision, meaning that the Federal Court [...]
Constitutional Law: Violation of the Fourth Amendment
The initiators of the Amendment believed that being free from the intrusion of the government into one's home is a natural right and therefore indispensable to liberty.
The Case Korematsu v. United States
United States illustrates that the principles imbedded in the Constitution of the United States can be violated or at least misinterpreted, especially at the time when the country has to cope with a threat to [...]
The Supreme Court
The importance of the Supreme Court to the country has been cemented through the various powers bestowed upon the court by Article III of the constitution.
Procedural Law
While procedural law denotes the body of law that prescribes rules, rights, and statutes governing the proceedings of a court of law in criminal, civil and administrative lawsuits, substantive law is basically a statutory law [...]
Negligence in Law
Breach of duty The second element of negligence is the breach of duty. In this regard, the negligence of a plaintiff is weighed against that of the defendant.
Public Administration and Administrative Law
The laws of the land define boundaries in which public administrators offer guidance, as well as the roles of the citizens in the decision making process.
Case Brief: U.S. v. Duka
The court ruled that the defendants were guilty of conspiracy to murder the American soldiers. The court held that the 4th Amendment does not require a strict standard of "the primary purpose".
Legal Gun Ownership
This implies that an increase in the number of legally permitted guns would lead to a reduction in gun related violence and crimes due to the increase in the cost of committing such crimes.
Title VII of the Constitution
In the organization, article VII requires that the religious beliefs and practices of employees should be given priority over the interests of the company.
Value of Privacy Perspectives
Traditionally, the value of privacy was based on the strong belief that each individual deserves the right to be left alone and the right to choose what he/she wants to disclose to other people.
Inmate Rights in America’s System
Besides being notified, inmates have the right to invite witnesses during the hearings to witness in their favor as a way of convincing the court.
Brown Vs. Board of Education
The plaintiffs argued that racial segregation in public schools had led to inequalities in syllabus, quality of facilities and the modes of transportation used.
The United States Supreme Court: Marbury v Madison
In his defense of the implementation of judicial review, he draws attention to a distinction between the will of the majority in reference to the society and the will of the majority in reference to [...]
U.S Supreme Court: Antonin Scalia as a textualist
The paper discusses some of the ways in which the theory of textualism makes interpretation easier, simplifies challenges, and how the theory compares to the theories of originalism and common law use of the principle [...]
ADR impact on the substance of justice
2 Relevance of the ADR as an alternative method of settling disputes The ADR process facilitates the involvement of the affected party in making new agreements that can prevent future occurrences of a dispute.
The case of Rockwell Kent and Secretary of State
He argued that according to the laws governing matters of issuance of a passport, the only relevant issue was that of his citizenship and since that was not in contention he argued that other issues [...]
Counter argue Plessy v Fergusson
"We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority.
Supreme Court in Israel
US and UK Methods of Choosing High Court Judges In the US, the high court judge is appointed for life by the president himself; of course this has to be by the consent of the [...]
Traditional litigation
In this phenomenon, only the accused and the plaintiff appear in court where the court or jury makes a verdict in accordance to the evidence presented by the parties.
Trials and Verdicts
However, to understand the details related to interpreting the cases and law and to stating the verdict, it is necessary to analyze the processes related to different courts according to their jurisdiction, and to focus [...]
The Language of Justice to Excuse the Violence of Those in Power
The abuse of power is a prevalent phenomenon in diverse societies and systems of governance as evident by the practice of judges in the context of law and the ability of a president to pardon [...]
Countering An Evidence Suppression Motion
It is one of the reasons why the constitutions regulates the nature of the evidence used by the prosecution team in a court of law.
Law in the Information Age 2.0
5 The lack of proper legal protection of the freedom of speech in Australia has prompted some observers to advance the opinion that the freedom of speech only exists to the extent that there is [...]
Rights of the Accused
Besides, in 1960, the Supreme Court added to the rights of the accused through establishing that the government should offer an attorney for the accused, whereby the individual can not afford such services.
The Judiciary system
Other interesting aspects of the judiciary include the criteria followed in the selection of chief judges and the senior judges. The American Judiciary is indeed a diverse and equally challenging structure of the legal system.
The right to own a property
In accordance with this case study, the government regulation claims that, since the society is enlightened on the property use effects on the ecological system, the courts should go back to the pre-1922 constitution application.
Procedures in the justice system
The business inspections can be conducted for checking the business records, the state of equipment and firearms without a warrant. The courts do not need to authorize more inspections for avoiding the violation of the [...]
The Justice System: the Right to Counsel
The meaning of the right to counsel includes the right of defendants who have no funds for hiring a lawyer to assistance of an appointed counsel which is especially meaningful in proceedings leading to imprisonment [...]
‘R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul’
Scalia's views insisted that the Ordinance limited the freedom of speech and it only included the expressions regarding race, sex and religion and therefore, hostility could be expressed in other ways such as political association [...]
Understanding of Constitutions
Guy say that "this has led to many amendments to the Canadian constitution so as to abide by this tenets, some of them are the charter of rights and freedoms, division of power between the [...]
Introduction to Business Law
A team of highly skilled people is charged with the responsibility of drafting statutes on behalf of the legislature before they can be passed to the courts for interpretation. There are several advantages that may [...]
The Judicial Branch
The major component of these rights and liberties are the contents of the fundamental freedoms and privileges contained in 13 and 14th amendments of the United States constitution guaranteeing certain freedoms and privileges to all [...]
Drug Courts and Their Efficiency
Thus, the absence of an effective policy is the main factor that led to the establishment of drug courts. These are one of the main points that can be made.
Opinion of the Judge
In 2011, the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder organized by the soldier's father Albert Snyder in Westminster, Maryland, was picketed by Fred Phelps and the members of his family belonging to the Westboro [...]
Exploiting Nazism in Abortion Debate
In his essay "Exploiting Nazism in Abortion Debate," Colleen Connell argues that the recent Supreme Court ruling that abortion and family planning should be left to be decisions of an individual and not the state [...]