How to Write an Outline for an Essay on Administrative Law
Essays on Administrative Law may have subjects ranging from constitutional law to transport regulation. Knowing how to use the structure of your paper to your convenience gives you an advantage over other essay-writers.
Apart from achieving an in-depth understanding of the subject that you are writing about, here are some ideas to help you begin your essay:
Tip #1
Research and write down the books that you feel will help you write an excellent essay. Use them as the starting basis for your bibliography to give your writing sufficient credibility.
Reading even a little bit on any of your assigned administrative law essay topics will help you get some understanding of how literature can help you structure your argument and support your case’s theme.
Tip #2
Brainstorm your ideas after you have done your research and give attention to how you can split your essay up into subheadings, especially if it promises to be lengthy. Using an approach of “administrative law questions and answers” may help get your thoughts in order.
Tip #3
Focus on your subject and remove any subtopics that do not help you build your central argument. For example, if you are writing tribunals essays, ask yourself whether the inclusion of a description of other types of courts advances your thesis statement.
Remember, an excellent piece of writing is one that stays on topic in every paragraph!
Tip #4
Write down some variations of administrative law essay titles for your work, and think about which one works best and why. Ask yourself which title allows your readers to gauge both your stance on the subject and the methods you will use.
Facts The 2001 Patriot Act revised a provision of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), 50 U.S.C. Sec 1804 to require a law enforcement agent to confirm “a significant purpose” rather than “the purpose” of conducting the investigation in obtaining foreign surveillance data. Shnewer, Tatar, and the Duka brothers lived in New Jersey, though the Duka […]
In the US, the increase in cases of gun violence has generated heated debates over legal gun ownership (Krouse 33). Thirty-three states permit its lawful citizens to own firearms. The Right to Carry (RTC) law allows law-abiding citizens to be issued with gun permits. Critics assert that the current increase in the number of gun […]
Title VII is a chapter in the constitution that prevents employers from discriminating workers based on their religious affiliations. The constitution prevents employers from discriminating employees based on their religious practices and beliefs. The law demands that employers must respect the religious views of employees in the organization. However, the law does not prevent religious […]
Privacy is a value that people in the world today hold in high esteem. Traditionally, the value of privacy was based on the strong belief that each individual deserves the right to be left alone and the right to choose what he/she wants to disclose to other people. The concept of privacy has become significantly […]
Introduction Like other criminal justice systems around the world, America’s system has undergone significant changes to become what it is today. During the 19th century, the “hands-off doctrine” described the relationship between American courts and the correctional system of the country (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2012). Prisoners were largely viewed by the law as slaves of […]
This case dealt with the issue of racial segregation in public schools in Kansas. The ruling by the US Supreme Court determined that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The case and its subsequent ruling set a precedent in the history of the country. It was one of the most extraordinary steps towards civil […]
Introduction The case of Marbury v Madison 5 U.S 137 (1830) is one of the most notable cases in the United States. Over the years, scholars have presented varying views concerning the validity of judicial review as one of the roles of the Supreme Court and its effect on separation of powers between the judiciary […]
Introduction The concept of separation of powers aims at ensuring that branches of government with different tasks and mandates perform their duties independently without interference according to their areas of specialization. The main reason for such specialization is to limit the power that each branch of government has in a bid to prevent the creation […]
Introduction Traditionally, the courts have been seen as the last resort when it comes to arbitration of justice among parties. The court encourages parties engaged in legal disputes to solve cases using “alternative methods” which do not involve the court because the norm is that a court has to rule in favor of a given […]
Brief statement of facts This case involved Rockwell Kent and other people who sued the Secretary of State for denying them travel passports on the basis of the fact that they held communistic associations and beliefs. Kent intended to travel to England where he was going to attend a meeting (Cooper, 2006 p.34) and he […]
“We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff’s argument to consist in assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that […]
Introduction Supreme Court Judges Selection One of the most elite private clubs in Israel is the Supreme Court. It is mainly dominated by the so called secular Ashkenazim. This is an old boys’ network that has excluded religious judges and Sephardim. In Israel, democracy has been undermined by the current ruling system. There has been […]
Traditional litigation occurs when the offended person reports the offense to a court. In this phenomenon, only the accused and the plaintiff appear in court where the court or jury makes a verdict in accordance to the evidence presented by the parties (Kubba, 2012). Usually, the court evaluates the rules that apply to the case […]
The important result of the legal decision-making process is the verdict which can end the trial process and state the form of punishment for the convicted person. However, to understand the details related to interpreting the cases and law and to stating the verdict, it is necessary to analyze the processes related to different courts […]
The abuse of power is a prevalent phenomenon in diverse societies and systems of governance as evident by the practice of judges in the context of law and the ability of a president to pardon criminals. Judges operate within a legal structure, which constrains their roles in the administration of retributive justice and curtails their […]
Introduction In the United States of America (USA), the constitution stipulates certain criteria that parties should meet for a court of law to consider any piece of evidence as admissible in law. For example, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that such evidence was acquired in a lawful manner (Roberson, Wallace & Stuckey, 26). […]
Introduction Many jurisdictions around the world have different laws regarding defamation. These laws protect people from wrongful representation through the publication of defamatory, slanderous, or harmful information.1 Most civil law jurisdictions around the world treat defamation cases, not as civil cases, but as criminal cases.2 However, some advocates for freedom of speech (including the United […]
The phrase due process implies that laws should be practiced justly and equally to each person, particularly a citizen who becomes accused of a crime. The whole due process originated from founders of the United States, following their colonial experience (Kime, 2011). The founders realized that it was both impossible for democracies to work and […]
The lectures on the American Judiciary leave one with a strong impression of its sheer complexity. The American Judicial system is believed to be the most complex and dynamic legal system in the world. This complexity is further heightened by the fact that the United States is a large country with several minor state judicial […]
Weather in the previous or current laws, Individuals has rights to own property. Laws protecting the rights of individuals and their property are endorsed. The thesis statement of this paper is; laws are not meant to limit the value of land as a property but they are ordained to protect it as a natural resource […]
The US Supreme Court has sanctioned several types of checkpoints, defining the specific requirements for them. To be recognized as constitutional, a checkpoint has to conform to the constitutional requirements of its briefness, minimization of its intrusiveness and not direct relation to the criminal investigation. With the wide range of existing checkpoints which have been […]
Do you believe the right to counsel is a meaningful one, given all the interpretation it has received by the Supreme Court? Identify amendments relevant to this issue The right to counsel has been provided mostly to individuals who could afford it until 1963 when in case Gideon v. Wainwright the Supreme Court recognized that […]
‘R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul’ is a 1992 case involving the United States Supreme Court which had to make a ruling depending on the U.S First Amendment, Free speech clause. The case involved Robert A. Viktora (R.A.V) who was 17years of age, Athur Miller aged 18 years old and other teenagers who made a […]
A constitution is a set of rules that people of a certain nation have come up with and agreed upon. It is used for moral, political guidance and to govern the people. A Constitution can be written like that of United States or unwritten like that of Britain. In every sovereign state there are laws […]
Introduction Generally, statutes provide a mechanism for the legislature to ensure that citizens live and act within set legal boundaries. It thus follows that any interpretation of statutes has constitutional repercussions. Ostensibly, legal systems in the world can be classified into two general categories. On one hand is the common law that has its origins […]
Rights and Liberties Rights and liberties is a term that refers to the set of rights granted to an individual by the virtue of them being American citizens. The major component of these rights and liberties are the contents of the fundamental freedoms and privileges contained in 13 and 14th amendments of the United States […]
Introduction The growing rates of incarceration among people, who take drugs, prompted legislators to adopt different strategies in order to address this issue. Drug courts are believed to be one of the solutions to this problem. This paper is aimed at examining the functioning of these institutions and their efficiency. These are the main questions […]
In 2011, the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder organized by the soldier’s father Albert Snyder in Westminster, Maryland, was picketed by Fred Phelps and the members of his family belonging to the Westboro Baptist Church. Phelps proclaimed that the deaths of soldiers should be discussed as God’s punishment for the nation’s tolerant attitude […]
Introduction In his essay “Exploiting Nazism in Abortion Debate,” Colleen Connell argues that the recent Supreme Court ruling that abortion and family planning should be left to be decisions of an individual and not the state is a good step towards respecting human rights by giving women the freedom to decide what is good for […]
The case between Brown and the Board of Education (Brown v. Board of Education 1954) is usually considered a landmark ruling in the United States since the Supreme Court declared the law allowing separate schools for blacks unconstitutional. In a previous ruling involving Plessy and Ferguson (Plessy v. Ferguson 1896), the court ruled in favored […]
This refers to the 1973 controversial case where the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional all state laws that prevented women from procuring an abortion. In many states, abortion was considered the killing of the unborn hence it was unconstitutional. The states regulated abortion since they only allowed it when the life of the mother was in […]
The framers of the constitution drafted the constitution in such a way that no branch would be would be powerful than the other. The constitution aimed at separating powers because it was believed that leaving power in the hands of one individual would lead to dictatorship. The drafters borrowed the works of John Locke, even […]
Voter identification laws raised controversies in the 2012 elections in the US. By the time voters were electing new leaders, close to thirty states had already enacted laws barring a voter from masquerading as a genuine voter. However, critics noted that the voter identification laws were meant to disenfranchise voters and discourage them from participating […]
Introduction The case Reynolds v. Sims (1964) appealed from the U.S. District Court. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Alabama District Court due to the inadequate apportionment of the population voters. In the majority of cases, district voters should be equally allocated to permit everyone to quote equally. According to the Alabama constitution, each […]
Each state has the mandate of enacting statutes that govern the day-to-day activities of the state. Time and again laws are enacted which in one way or the other seem to hinder the normal operations of business among states. Though the federal government is expected to regulate how states conduct their affairs, situations have been […]
Introduction The Supreme Court judicial review is largely based on two major theories. The Living Document theory states that the constitution is a living thing; therefore it should be flexible and not rigid as the Ten Commandments written on the stone. This theory however conflicts with the Originality Theory which argues that the judges and […]
Introduction The decision of the Supreme Court on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission shows that the First Amendment to the Constitution can give rise to various interpretations and legal debates. Moreover, this case can have profound implications for political campaign in the country. This paper is aimed at analyzing the reasons behind this ruling […]
Introduction The paper will look at Affirmative Action and the initial intent of its legislation. Two court cases on Affirmative Action will also be considered with their results and conclusion. After that, results of Affirmative Action, both positive and negative will be noted and a personal view of the issue brought out. Discussion In most […]
Introduction Killing someone without going against the constitution has been a controversial legal topic since the reinstatement of death penalty in 1976. In fact, statistics reveal that over 1200 convicts have been legally put to death since 1976 and the number is likely to rise. Elder and Terkel (2010) illustrate that “if the death penalty […]
The Supreme Court in the US ruled that New York Times and Washington Post could go ahead to publish the then classified Pentagon Paper without fear of government censure. The case was ruled in 1971, commonly referred to as per curiam (Harold and Schmidt 17). The head of state demanded a governmental authority to compel […]
Introduction: Description of the dispute Judicial review is a distinctive feature of constitutional law in the United States. This is The reason why the power held by federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions can be overlooked by the supreme court which in most cases its faced by disagreements among […]
Introduction Racism is a destructive form of discrimination. This is because is devalues other people’s identity and denies them their right to exercise power. It destroys the unity within a community and leads to social divisions. It violates the democratic right of equality and the fair treatment of all people. One has to understand the […]
Introduction It is certain that constitutional amendments are crucial when eliminating problems in the original document. Amendment 14, especially section three, outlines that nobody would occupy the lawmaking, executive, or legal office if he or she engages in a revolt The section further elaborates that no member of the state legislature, administrative or judicial should […]
Although the principles of judiciary demand the judicial process to follow due legal processes to the letter, legal crises do occur in some instances. Legal conflict arises when inconsistencies emerge between the constitution and the general laws. A classical example is the Marbury v. Madison case of the United States in which a legal conflict […]
The government can have overwhelming authority over its citizenry. However, the United States constitution has put checks and balances in place in order to ensure that in maintaining law and order, the police officers respect the rights of the populace. In other words, the constitution has set ethical boundaries that government officers are to respect […]
The case The topic of the selected amicus curiae brief is defamation. The case was filed in the Supreme Court of the United States in the year 1979 and involved Hutchinson versus Proxmire. The main issue of the case was whether a research scientist could be described as a public figure for the application of […]
Bills are proposals bought into a legislative body for review. Upon acceptance, these proposals are then enacted into laws enforceable by the country. Bills go through a number of processes before they are enacted into laws (Sullivan, 2007). A proposed bill is first introduced to the house by either a member of the senate, the […]
Due process is the application of laws in an equal and fair manner to every citizen, particularly those accused of crime. It is characterized by the thinking that, the rights of the accused need to be deliberately protected in whatever investigation of the criminal justice. Basically, the due process requires that the accused be served […]
Introduction It is the duty of the U.S. Armed Forces to protect the country from both internal and external threats yet few people seem to realize that the basis for such responsibilities is not due to orders from the president or that of Congress but rather it is a result of a sworn oath to […]
History of bans Legislation is the process a bill goes through in the legislative house for it to be approved as law. Documents produced during the process serve as reference material for the judiciary to investigate whether a particular bill should be enacted into law. There have been quite a number of legislative bans on […]
Please upgrade your Browser
Unfortunately, your browser is too old to work on this site.