Home > Free Essays > Law > Judicial Process on Criminals

Judicial Process on Criminals Essay Examples and Topics

Presumption of Innocence in Tunisian Legal System

When attempting to understand the history of the presumption of innocence, it is important to note that the Pharaohs were the first persons to adopt the basic principles for punishing those who committed crimes.

The Federal Rules of Evidence in Litigation

The term 'Federal Rules of Evidence ' refers to a code of evidence law that is used to govern the admissibility of facts provided by parties to legal cases in the US Federal Court System.

Legal Procedures and Courtroom Experience

Consequently, it facilitates the understanding of ethical principles and code of conduct that one needs to exhibit in the courtroom during the proceedings.

Law: Sentences to Fix the Imprisonment Term

The law defines a range of definite sentences that the judge can issue, upon considering the circumstances of the crime. The judge has no power to change any part of the sentence to suit the [...]

Forensic Expert Defending Innocent Cybercriminal

It is paramount to take all the necessary measures to guarantee the safety of collected evidence, and it is reasonable to monitor the actions of forensic witnesses in such cases to ensure that they are [...]

Rompilla v. Beard: Synopsis of Opinions

The majority concluded that the defense counsel did not make reasonable efforts to examine all mitigating factors and present them in the court, which could have influenced the jury's decision.

Criminal Justice Careers in the Modern Society

The purpose of the presentation: The given presentation is devoted to the most important aspects related to the criminal justice career and role specialists of this sort play in any community.

The Crown Court Case: Drug and Weapons Trafficking

To continue the process of the trial, it is necessary to translate the found text and identify what the defendant was about to do before he was arrested, as it will help to proceed with [...]

Judiciary Issues in the US

The purpose of the interview was to understand the position of the supervisor regarding the key issues being addressed by the criminal justice administration's judiciary area.

Foster v. Chatman’ Case

The details of the case reveal that the prosecutor was allowed to strike all of the African American judges out before the case of an African American defendant was presented.

Modern Justice System

Hence, the existence of juvenile and adult justice systems could also be considered one of the main peculiarities of the modern age.

Criminal Court: Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi Case

One of the current criminal cases addresses the issue of cultural heritage destruction. In the recent past, the destruction of historical sites is something that has been used as a critical aspect of warfare.

Exclusionary Rule and Alternative Remedies

In case a link cannot be established between the evidence and the illegal action committed in the acquisition of the evidence, then by the doctrine of attenuation, the evidence falls outside the exclusionary rule.

Criminal Justice System Reforms

This essay selects the enactment of Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act and International Parental Child Kidnapping Act from the study by Karmen and searches for evidence of the success of the provided measures [...]

Cox Broadcasting Corporation vs Cohn’s Case

On appeal, the Supreme Court held that the trial court made an error in the interpretation of the Georgia statute and declared that the First and the Fourteenth Amendments require no legal judgment for the [...]

Trials with False Light Claims

While the privacy of a person is a very important part of their rights, and it is the responsibility of the law to protect citizens from harm, both physical and mental, false light claims are [...]

O. J. Simpson’s Trial and Indirect Evidence

For example, the fact that the DNA sample taken from the accused matched the one that was found at the crime scene shows that there is a noticeable connection between O.J.and the murder.

Court Problem and Its Future

In the face of ever-changing realities of social and political contexts of the modern world, it is necessary to consider the transformation of the role of the judiciary system in the delivery of justice.

Insanity Defense in American Jurisprudence

The presence of the men's rea element of a crime, which is directly relevant to criminal intent, is known to have nudged 14 American states to start looking for an alternative to the existing NGRI [...]

Wrongful Conviction and Miscarriage in Canada

The inevitability of punishment and the measures aimed at the promotion of law help to limit the harmful activity of various individuals for them not to undermine the core principles of the existence of a [...]

Daniel and Lyrissa Touby v. United States

The plaintiffs went to court to dismiss their indictment on the grounds that Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act gives the Attorney General unconstitutional legislative power to deal with drug indictments.

State v. Stu Dents Case Prosecution

In this case, Dents indicated in the journal found in his house that he planned to purchase a rope, rags, and a knife for reasons that he did not reveal.

Gideon’s Legal Case and Judicial Procedure Change

The book written by Anthony Lewis reveals all stages of the judicial process that occurred after the petty larceny, which provides an opportunity to trace the events, discuss the role of the court in them [...]

Electronic Arbitration Perspectives in Saudi Arabia

In the course of development, it had a great number of significant phases such as the appearance of Roman law, which is used by all civilized countries in the world, and the creation of the [...]

Reintegrative Shame Theory in the US Justice System

On a bigger scale, the method of reintegrative shaming can be described as a form of discredit that is authorized by the legal system to reinforce the moral link between the community and the wrongdoer.

Courts and Tribunals in the United Arab Emirates

The existence of such a tool can be taken as the guaranty of success of the process of negotiations between all sides of the conflict. That is why courts and tribunals should be transparent for [...]

Court Hearing Visit Report

Despite the need to uphold the principle of the open justice, some courts are held in camera, that is, they are not open to the public.

Suspect Examination and Body Seach in Terry v Ohio

Even though the court excluded the trial concept that the firearms had been detained throughout a search event according to a legitimate seizure, the court rejected the attempt to suppress and acknowledged the firearms as [...]

Plea Bargaining, Its Effects and Ethics

The accused expects the Judge to minimize the sentence on the basis of the fact that the defendant pleads guilty. The ethics of plea bargaining are represented by a continuous debate on the rejection of [...]

Jessica Lenahan’ vs United States’ Case

The position of the court was that Lenahan had not presented enough evidence before the court to show that the police had failed to take action as required by the restricting order.

Trials and Verdicts in the Court Proceedings

The presiding judge of the high court further confirmed that the regional adjudicator granted a fine that was to be paid by the appellant through a third party to compensate the petitioner.

Criminal Justice Administration

Moreover, the security of officers in the criminal justice system is affected by the proliferation of illegal arms in the society.

Affirmative Action in Judicial Selection

An important merit of the affirmative action in the selection of judges is that is ensures diversification in the bench. Malleson declares that "the lack of diversity in the composition of the judiciary has a [...]

The US Law: Trials and Verdicts

The case was heard at the circuit court of the Twelfth Judiciary Circuit, the Appellate Court in Will County, Illinois. After a lengthy analysis of the evidences from both sides, the Panel held that the [...]

Wrongful Convictions in the US Judicial System

In this context, wrongful convictions subvert the purpose for which the judicial system is established in the US. In this sense, convictions ensure that the judicial system does justice not only to the victim but [...]

Rodney King’s Case of Racial Discrimination

King was brutally beaten by officers belonging to the Los Angeles Police Department after a car chase that resulted in a court case in which the officers involved were charged and acquitted for assault. The [...]

Judicial System: the Role of Judges

Judges listen to allegations brought by the prosecutors, the attorney defenders, and the testimony of the witnesses and rule whether the evidence is valid or not.

Human Rights Violations in Chile

In order to confront past abuses and human rights violations, both civilian collaborators and the past military officers who took part in the violations have been taken through the prosecution process owing to the torture [...]

Texas v. Johnson

The demonstrators marched the city of Dallas with the event culminating in the respondent's public flag desecration. The State of Texas agreed that the conduct of the respondent was expressive in nature.

Martha Stewart case analysis

In their closing arguments, the prosecution asked the judges to consider the evidence given by the prosecution and find the defendants guilty of the charges against them.

Law: Civil Procedure Hypos

Jurors can freely allow an amendment if doing so will help in the presentation of merits and the opposing party fails to prove to the court that the actions of the petitioner would show partiality [...]

Moving Beyond Simple Conflict of Interest

The case deals with out of the way payments made to physicians in order to get more referrals from them. Answer: The differences between criminal law and civil law pertain to the nature of crime, [...]

A brief summation of the rulings

This case was handled in the US Supreme Court and acted as a test for the standards used in admitting both scientific and expert evidences related to a given testimony.

Public Defender System

Taking into consideration the above-mentioned outcomes of pressure on defendants, it is possible to conclude that the public defender system may be improved, if prosecutors try to use checked evidences and proper psychological evaluation of [...]


The court observed that the client was not within the care of the motel when he was crossing the road. It was the responsibility of the clients to ensure that they crossed the road safely [...]

Puerta and Torres Case

Running from the scene of the accident was one of the actions that convinced Puerta that Torres was guilty. Puerta claimed that Torres' actions after the accident showed that she was guilty of the offense.

Forensic Evidence in Criminology

Footwear evidence as the name suggests, is the foot impressions that used in connecting the culprit to the act of crime.

Abner Louima case and the outcome

The case of Abner Louima was one of the most brutal cases in New York, when a police officer brutalized the arrested suspect with a plunger. When the suspect was brought into the police station, [...]

The Evidence Act 2008

6 This kind of rationale is therefore faulty because if the jury lacks the necessary expertise to handle the matter it will not evaluate the viability of the information presented to the court by the [...]

Snyder v Phelps

According to Supreme Court of the United States, the issue of Snyder v. In the case of Snyder v.

Strauss-Khan Arrested for Attempted Rape

The reporter did not disappoint because in the course of the investigation he was able to determine that there was a police line-up made immediately after the arrest and the maid was able to identify [...]

The Case of Martha Stewart: On Improper Actions

Despite all the emotions concerning the social status of the accused and her attempts to plead not guilty, there is no doubt that the woman is to be charged for the negligence of laws. Therefore, [...]

The Justice System: the Case Carroll vs. United States

After the enforcement of the automobile exception in 1925, courts recognized the difference between the searches of buildings and searches of ships, automobiles and wagons which can be quickly moved from the location before the [...]

Criminal Evidence and Legal Issue

The privilege can be retained by the accused who decides to take the stand in case if the evidence he/she gives is not related to the crime.

Irish Libel Suit Earns Record Damages Award

Kinsella filed the suit in response to a press release issued by Kenmare which made no reference to the fact that Kinsella was sleepwalking at the time that he visited Corcoran's suite.

Steps of Criminal Procedure in US

If law-enforcing agents conducting the arrest violate any of the provisions, then the arrestees have the right to refuse all the prosecution evidences presented in court.

The Rape Case

Additionally, the stereotypes of rape in this case are included through the characteristics of the victim such as age, sexual behaviours, mode of dressing, relations with the perpetrator and the place of the offence.[9] In [...]

Criminal Procedure Policy

In the final part, the appropriateness of the Bill of Rights to the states with respect to the 14th Amendment is illustrated.

Preliminary Examination in Felony Cases

Unlike the state grand jury, the function of the trial juries is to decide whether the accused individual or group is guilty or not guilty of a crime that he is accused of.

People vs. Santana. A brief Case

Judging by the behavior of the dog, the officer came to the conclusion that the defendant transported illegal substance among the rest of the luggage.

The O.J. Verdict Video

Throughout the trial, it was evident that the experiences of the African Americans with the country's criminal justice system would definitely have a great impact on the direction of the case.

The Examination of Warfield’s Case

However, in the event that Warfield manages to convince the Supreme Court that he was not part of the group, there is still the element of omission for a crime.

Maryland v. Pringle

The court also held that the drugs could have belonged to any of the three passengers and as such, the police did not violate the fourth amendment when he arrested him bearing in mind that [...]

Earl Warren & William Rehnquist

Notably however, it looks like the Warren court was more willing to consider the rights of the defendant against those of the state, something that was not popular in the Rehnquist court.

Conviction and Punishment

For instance, a person convicted of misdemeanor sexual assault on a child in Colorado can be given a sentence of up to12 years, depending on the age of the child, his relationship with the child, [...]

Annotation of: Hispanics and the death penalty

It also identified several manifestations of racial discrimination between the whites and non whites by comparing Asian Americans and Hispanics marriages with the whites and discovered that the Asian Americans and Hispanics had higher chances [...]

Justice Favors the Rich

Michael Vick's case displayed just how long the legal system had take long to act on high-profile persons as it would to the rest of the population.

Criminal justice

The criminal process should operate smoothly and swiftly and the main goal of the criminal justice process should be uncovering the truth and establishing factual guilt of the arrestees.

How Judges Think at a Criminal Trial

As overseers of the justice system, it is always in their best interests and the societies that Judges think objectively in criminal cases.
Psst... Stuck with your
assignment? 😱
Psst... Stuck with your assignment? 😱
Do you need an essay to be done?
What type of assignment 📝 do you need?
How many pages (words) do you need? Let's see if we can help you!