Judicial Process on Criminals Essay Examples and Topics

When it comes to determining whether a juvenile offender will be tried as an adult, juvenile court judges usually look at the seriousness of the alleged offense and the need to protect the community from [...]

The complexity of circumstances surrounding the case made each of the judges explore how to precisely interpret the case according to provisions in the commonwealth law.

The court observed that the client was not within the care of the motel when he was crossing the road. It was the responsibility of the clients to ensure that they crossed the road safely [...]

Michael Vick's case displayed just how long the legal system had take long to act on high-profile persons as it would to the rest of the population.

For example, the fact that the DNA sample taken from the accused matched the one that was found at the crime scene shows that there is a noticeable connection between O.J.and the murder.

He did not admit his involvement in the crime and was eventually acquitted by the court in 2018 due to a lack of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

Consequently, it facilitates the understanding of ethical principles and code of conduct that one needs to exhibit in the courtroom during the proceedings.

On the other hand, one of the major downsides of the indeterminate system is that it gives the parole board much too much power, which can lead to discriminatory rulings.

In criminal justice system, the assessment of the evidence adduced by witnesses determines the innocence or the guilt of the accused.

During the specific day that the trial took place, Montresor, the defendant, entered the courtroom for the verdict to be read.

Involves the investigation of the death of Caylee Marie Anthony, a two-year-old daughter of Casey Marie, the defendant. The prosecution in the case sought the death penalty for the murder of Caylee.

Hoying fully acknowledging the violation of writing to the victim, which is in violation of the civil protection order asked Ms.

Hence, the existence of juvenile and adult justice systems could also be considered one of the main peculiarities of the modern age.

The Court of Appeal followed the persuasive precedent R v Howe and rejected the defense as inapplicable in cases of murder or attempted murder.

Therefore, the purpose of this essay is to ascertain, using the situations of Eusinazuri and Yates, the outcomes of the court rulings following the murder allegations.

However, the burden of a proof of the petition was shifted to the petitioner to prove her defense. Arizona, Falater was a believer of the Mormon's faith and resorted to kill his wife since she [...]

The gist of Nicole Smith's argument is that the death penalty or capital punishment is necessary because it deters murder, thereby saving the victims' families and friends the pain of losing loved ones.

To understand which form of justice is most appropriate in the case of Julio Blanco Garcia, it is necessary to analyze peculiarities of the three forms of justice and apply them to the case.

This paper will review the evidence and ethical implications of the punishment and correction relationship in the United States and examine the ethics of incarceration in relation to the alternative methods of punishment.

Juror #8, played by Henry Fonda, is one of the main characters of the movie as he manages to impact the audience and to demonstrate new facts that could help the accused boy to get [...]

Judges listen to allegations brought by the prosecutors, the attorney defenders, and the testimony of the witnesses and rule whether the evidence is valid or not.

The Crown appealed these acquittals in the Supreme Court, and in a majority decision, the court agreed to the propositions and convicted the accused with respect to all his counts.

The teacher took the two learners to the school's administrator, who used the teacher's report to search T.L.O.'s purse. The school head finds drugs in the purse, after which the school contacts her mother, who [...]

On the other hand, the teen claims that the two were stopped by a police where Adam shot the police who was approaching the car they were in.

Despite the need to uphold the principle of the open justice, some courts are held in camera, that is, they are not open to the public.

In this context, wrongful convictions subvert the purpose for which the judicial system is established in the US. In this sense, convictions ensure that the judicial system does justice not only to the victim but [...]

Jurors can freely allow an amendment if doing so will help in the presentation of merits and the opposing party fails to prove to the court that the actions of the petitioner would show partiality [...]

Additionally, the stereotypes of rape in this case are included through the characteristics of the victim such as age, sexual behaviours, mode of dressing, relations with the perpetrator and the place of the offence.[9] In [...]

The criminal cases described in the documentaries present vexing evidence of a miscarriage of justice that persists in all levels of the conviction process, most notably law enforcement and the judiciary.

Poor unit management is also evident at the Morey Unit because the staff is not in a position to associate with each one of the prisoners at a personal level due to the large population [...]

Apparently, the actions and circumstances which took place prior to Lorena's act of severing her husband's penis, namely, the rape of Lorena Bobbitt by her husband, as well as the constant domestic violence of John [...]

The presence of the men's rea element of a crime, which is directly relevant to criminal intent, is known to have nudged 14 American states to start looking for an alternative to the existing NGRI [...]

In the mini-series released by Netflix, The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez, an extreme case of child maltreatment is depicted, with the parents failing to provide any kind of safety to the child.

The circumstances surrounding his life were perfect for the police to put the blame for the recent murder on him, and the evidence found on the scene of the crime scantly connected Williamson with it [...]

In this paper, we will focus on San Quentin State prison, based in California, USA, where we will discuss factors such as current conditions of the prison, proposals, and approaches to help protect the public, [...]

Gideon's Trumpet, a book by Anthony Lewis, tells the story of Clarence Earl Gideon, whose case in the Supreme Court changed the judicial system in the United States.

The program has been controversial due to its use of civil asset forfeiture, which allows the government to take assets without a criminal conviction.

Thus, it is interesting to discover whether the trials presented an adequate and fair prosecution of genocide, and this statement is the purpose of the essay.

While in custody, the suspect is awaiting trial or bail, and the severity of the charges determines the ability of the lawyer to handle such matters.

The legal system is more adapted to safeguarding individuals than the political institutions of government for several reasons. Finally, compared to the elected arms of government, the judicial system is more suited to uphold individual [...]

One of the strictest norms is the prohibition of cameras in the courtroom. The blinding denied the fair trial, which was introduced, leading to the rejection of the allegation by the courtroom.

The authors focus on the concept of noise and bias, but the emphasis of the book I on noise. After defining noise and bias in the first chapter, the authors dedicate the remaining five chapters [...]

With the help of these judicial procedures, it is possible to determine in the fairest forms the measure of freedom and responsibility of a citizen in their complex relations with other people, society, and the [...]

This essay aims to evaluate the use of solitary confinement, particularly in the United States, from two angles: that of the inmate's rights under the Constitution and Supreme Court case law and that of prison [...]

The attack and necessity mean the defendant's subjective belief that a victim's actions were unlawful and that the severity of self-defense actions was adequate.

The prerogative court has the power to probate wills, grant letters, and conduct all the proceedings; that is usually the case when the proceeding is initiated in the prerogative court in the first instance.

According to the Supreme Court, people may only enter a guilty plea if they know the repercussions and do it voluntarily.

The majority of states support the ability to condemn someone to death on specific occasions, while Texas is one of the states that use the death penalty the most.

When it became clear that the petitioner had a chance of proving that 1001 might not apply to "exculpatory no" this case was considered in more detail. It was eventually determined that the doctrine of [...]

In the court, Griffin refused to testify, and according to a prosecutor, the defendant's choice was evidence of guilt. In turn, it is the responsibility of the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt based on [...]

A bloody glove was found at the crime scene, and when the police decided to notify Simpson of the death of his wife, they found blood in the former athlete's car.

By the turn of the era, when the recent briefing of the adversary required process had been fully established, oral argument was reserved for the most critical topics. The government bears the burden of proving [...]

The criminal justice system needs to hold onto the presumption of innocence, and it is much more likely to work for first-time offenders than multiple offenders.

Additionally, the statute of limitations for the claim of fraud based on misrepresentation is a two-year statute defined in A.R.S.Sec. The right to prefer charges on the breach of oral contract is allowed within 3 [...]

The separation of powers itself diminishes the danger of oppression, as does the separation of powers between the federal and state governments.

After the jury ruled that the person was not guilty, the decision could not be challenged in court because the Constitution forbids the consideration of a case with the same defendant on an identical charge. [...]

The doctrine was included in the US Constitution to limit the power of the legal institutions and demonstrate the justice of governmental decisions, upholding the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. [...]

From the perspective of expenses of the two approaches, the Pennsylvania system seems more challenging to implement. The reason for it is the use of private-industry contracts under the Auburn standards fulfilled by convicts.

The problem of the press and system of justice interconnection is based on the freedom rights against the interference of the government in accordance with the Constitution Amendments; every person has a right to a [...]

However, the reality of the justice system is different for the majority. To summarize, class and race largely determine the quality of legal representation; primarily, this applies to the African American race.

Litigation is the act, procedure, or process of taking a case to the court of law for settling. The former requires a suit to occur due to a natural and uninterrupted act of negligence, resulting [...]

An important development at this level is the fact that a suspect can be temporarily freed on bond depending on the nature of the offense.

That makes it difficult to know how severe the crime is in relation to the sentence. The objectives of sentencing are to protect society.

It might be assumed, therefore, that the prison had minimum security; however, the guards were heavily armored and conducted regular raids to control the contraband, which is a characteristic of a high-security prison.

This paper addresses such facets of the issue as the use of technology, the role of media, the impact of social factors, and the most recent trends in the judicial system of South Africa.

Based on the presented data, I think the killer, in this case, is Sam, the bartender. The most compelling pieces of evidence were the facts that Sam had debts to dealers, as well as the [...]

The video clearly shows that his friend fulfilled the officer's demands and dropped his weapon, while Mohamed continued to move in the direction of the man, ignoring the demands of the police.

The right to counsel can be defined as a component of an individual's right to fair trial that gives him/her the right to be assisted by a counsel, and in the case the defendant cannot [...]

Of greater attention in the paper is the exploration of the levels of performance management in criminal justice departments and the impact on the levels of job satisfaction among employees working in these departments.

The decrease is due to the continuous sensitization programs on the dangers of substance abuse among children and rehabilitation programs that most of them undergo.

The system of courts is structured in a way that both the innocent and the guilty have a chance to be heard.

On the other hand, once the regulations are on the manuscripts, the prosecutors and the law enforcers should find a way and settle on how to bring them in operation.

Bexson, L 2011, The ultimate betrayal female child sex offenders: An exploration of theories, media representations and the role of the internet in relations to female perpetrators of child sexual abuse, Bachelor Thesis, Nottingham Trent [...]

In terms of security differences, one notes that the level of security is higher in federal prisons compared to state prisons.

One of the varieties of the sanctuary was applied to all members of the public while the other was reserved to the church members only.

The officers must expound on the objective of the interview. In addition, the pretrial officers also have to declare to the suspects the voluntary nature of these interviews.

It is apparent that the limitations to the exclusionary rule are on the rise and soon there may be limitation to admitting illegally obtained evidence in a trial.

The confession that was given by the defendant was relevant to this particular case since the defendant claimed that she knew the mentally ill youth was meant to die in the house once it was [...]

A jury is a group of legal experts who assess the evidence and give a verdict in a court of law.

To corroborate scientific, circumstantial and witness evidences, the prosecution needs to examine financial transactions of Roberts to prove that he was truly trafficking dangerous drugs according to the third count of charges.

The principle of judicial activism can violate the principle of separation of powers since it has been interpreted as legislation from the bench which amounts to judicial tyranny or judicial dictatorship.

More so, continued empowerment of victims to participate in sentencing process as evidenced from views and observations of many of judges and attorneys is that, it erodes and restricts the ability to try cases and [...]

It should be noted, though, that the problem in question can and should be addressed by suggesting the members of the community to participate in the process of the former criminal's reentry.

Although the test is considered to be fairly self-sufficient and accurate, the presence of the group in question is essential to the approval of the test results.

In other words, a psychological assessment of Bill, the person accused of a first-degree murder, is crucial to the fairness of the trial and the feasibility of the verdict to be passed.

The idea of updating the current justice system so that it could incorporate the elements of correction can be viewed as rather reasonable; however, when it comes to the execution of the specified concept, the [...]

The judicial system in the Republic of China is part of the three-pronged government of the country, besides the executive and legislative arms.

Our legal issue is to show that Apostolos Mangouras's actions amount to the violation of the EU's Convention on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal laws, the United Nations Convention on the law of [...]

All the police personnel have the right of legitimate use of force when carrying out their duty of enforcing the law.

First of all, some attorneys will hire psychologists to analyze the prospective jury pool and help pick out which jurors would be the most effective for the case at hand.

As a result, General Yamashita was the commander of all Japanese forces that were operating in Philippine, so he was responsible for their actions.

A comfortable conjecture towards development in the criminal justice field will be the use of these social networking sites as an interaction tool with the communities served, for sharing critical information and collecting tips.

With the advancement in forensic sciences of late we have had high cases of innocent people being exonerated due to lack of evidence as happen in the case of James Woodard in Dallas and the [...]

The US Supreme Court later overruled the ruling on the ground that the duration and the facts that made the petitioner to appeal were correct and the person was entitled to release.

As the world develops and the gap between the haves and the have-nots increases, the likelihood of the disadvantaged in the society of committing crime is very high.

A jury trial is a court proceeding whereby members of the public referred as the jury, are given the authority and the responsibility to make a legal finding that pertains a case which is then [...]

Any request, defense or objections which are competent of resolution devoid of any court proceedings of the common matter may be pleaded at any time before trial by motions. At the discretion of the judge [...]

Peer counselors should form part of the workers since they will be required to continually counsel the inmate and prepare her for life outside the precincts of jail.

Secondly, in polycentric disputes, the information provided to the adjudicator only by the affected parties might not be sufficient to determine the repercussions of a particular decision.

The committee was also in making reports to the convention. Reforms in judicial systems should be advocated to the countries that are signatories of UN convention.

Most of the courts require a guilty plea to be made in an open court. Most of the prosecutors settle cases whereby the legality of the police is going to be challenged.

The varied nature of this provision makes it diverse enough to support grounds that may be presented for the rejection of particular rulings and time and again a clause in the article may be used [...]

Mental evaluations were assigned by the court to examine the mental state of the appellant at the time of the crime.

Although they fled from the place, the police could reach them with the help of the evidence. According to the Fourth Amendment, the authority should have a warrant if they have to arrest a person [...]

Benny Peterson, the defendant, came out of his house to find that Charles Keitt, the deceased, and two friends in the back of Peterson's house stealing the windshield wipers from the defendant's wrecked car.

In addition, although her attorney disqualified the conviction on grounds that, the officers had obtained the evidence against her consent, the court effected the conviction on argument that the officers never took the materials forcefully [...]

The only responsibility that my client, Miller had was to bring in clients, and this being so, I am sure your Honor would agree with me that this by itself is not enough to level [...]

The decision of the trial court went in favor of the hospital and the court dismissed the claims of Regina Sampson against the hospital.

In the case of the defendant, race should not be a contributory factor and if this is so, then it can be concluded that the ruling was unfair.

In deciding to talk to the police it can be construed that Charles decided to waive his constitutional rights including that to remain silent, as well as that to have counsel being present.

The first of the methods is the so-called Golden Rule used in the majority of cases to dissolve the ambiguity of the words used in statutes or any other documented or oral pieces of information [...]

On the day the deed was executed, the plaintiff was driven in an automobile from his farm to Reno, Nevada for the purpose of the plaintiff and defendant being married in said city.

MacCormick states that to understand a case law is the same as understanding how that particular decision by particular judges about particular parties to particular cases can be used in making of the general rule [...]

The respondent was Vincent Landano. The case was decided by Rehnquist Court.

It is evident that the defending system created by Don and set up at the market was a dangerous construction that served as a threat to any person that would enter the store building. The [...]

Therefore, technology, simplification of the court language, and elimination of lawyers from lower crimes are the primary solutions to the adversarial system problems that the U.S.is facing presently.

In light of the fact that there are people who consider arbitrators as private judges in the negative meaning of the word, there is a need to discuss the concept of the arbitrator as a [...]

McDonald's case, who asserts that McDonald's was 80% to blame for the damages that Mrs. McDonalds was adamant that the cases were trivial and this shows the firm's disregard of customer safety.

Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees the equal protection of laws to every citizen.

The stage encompasses a selection of jurors to be present during the case after the litigants declare their wish to have their case settled in the courtroom.