Criminal Law Essay Examples and Topics

This has led to the formation of laws to govern drug trafficking and drug use in most countries that are determined to eradicate this problem.

The case of murder of JonBenet Ramsey is one of most mysterious episodes in the American criminology, and this report is the attempt to bring some light to the case based on the mistakes made [...]

If one is to discuss the issue with the senior management of the organization in which the crime occurred, there is a high chance that the issue will not be taken as seriously due to [...]

The work of police officers and other personnel in criminal justice requires proof and accuracy in determining the cause and effects of a crime.

The accused is alleged to have injured his wife due to careless driving that resulted in the demise of the unborn child, consequently a successful escape of the son unhurt.

In particular, according to the TechFite case, one example of a breach of duty of care might be the insufficient attention of the Security Analyst to the operations of the Application Division, which has led [...]

CCTV cameras are also used in places of work to aid employers to monitor their employees' activities, improve productivity and security, and reduce theft.

Although one of the mandates of the NYPD includes preventing crime from occurring by deploying legal means, this paper questions the legal and ethical foundation of the 'stop and frisk' law applied by the NYPD. [...]

The rise of Internet technology gave way to numerous challenges, and one of them is the spreading of cyberbullying. Recent data show that there is a clear gender distinction in terms of the perpetrators and [...]

One of the most essential arguments against the RA 10175 is the statement that the Act introduces a severe punishment for libel.

One thing that must be cleared to all is that it is not our view that the poor people are all guiltless victims who suffer the persecution of the rich people but it is said [...]

In covering the benefits and shortcomings of sex tourism, the paper will try to establish whether sex tourism is something that is ethical and desirable in society. The analyses of the legal aspect of sex [...]

Cases of murder falls in the rule of felony murder which is well stipulated by the constitution of any given country and the penalty is administered depending on whether the case was committed in an [...]

In the case of the former, it is evident that social class plays a key role in the emergence of knife crimes across the UK.

In the particular case under analysis the issue, which is presented to the court, is the admissibility of the evidence. As Melear states in her article, if the weapon which was not used in the [...]

Because hate crimes are associated with the violation of the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association, it is believed that the motive for hate crimes is a crime itself.

Those words which are often perceived by the public as the usual warning are important to protect the persons, and the Miranda Warning is used as the statement of the right against self-incrimination. The Miranda [...]

The least in ranking is crimes against public order for they have no serious repercussions to lives and livelihood of the involved people.

One of the key causes of overcrowding is the continuing growth in the population of criminals sent to jail. The people have had to wait for their trial turn, and the only place to wait [...]

Nevertheless, such a claim is questionable because it is the same constitution that has a bill of rights indicating that it is the right of every citizen to be protected and to live.

In the end, it was an electrician who identified the typical signs of abuse in Daniel that finally led police to investigate, thereby exposing the weakness and ineffectiveness of the Dual Track System; the child [...]

On the other hand, the hands-on doctrine, known as the inmates' rights era, was a reaction to the harsh conditions and abuse prevalent in many correctional facilities in the mid-twentieth century.

Finding the poison that Juan bought to poison his mother-in-law and kept somewhere in his car could be a significant piece of evidence.

Apart from the court staff, I expect to learn about the sections of the courtroom and the function of each. I am hoping to observe how, in the initial court proceedings, the charges are filed [...]

There was a sense of belief among Stephens and Dudley that their act of cannibalism would not result in persecution due to the custom of the sea.

In legal terms, the key difference between the two was that the Africans from Amistad were freeborn and enslaved in violation of the international agreements, while Dred Scott, despite his sojourn in Illinois, was born [...]

The given case will be analyzed from the perspective of Agnew's General Strain Theory, which was built upon the ideas of Merton's Strain Theory. Agnew's general strain theory fails to explain the magnitude and range [...]

They also had to swear to stay and follow the rules of the gang for a lifetime. Most members of the gang were also known to be talented in rap music and broadcasting and they [...]

Though these guidelines are available and are supposed to be the guide for the justice system, there have been cases when there have been a miscarriage of justice, which has led to the conviction of [...]

Various ethical issues such as the code of silence, the mental status of the offender, and limited evidence play a vital role in challenging the discretion of police officers in arresting the DV perpetrators.

The Court decided that there were objective markers of society's new preferences and standards, such as the fact that only a minority of the US States permitted the death penalty for the mentally retarded. Moreover, [...]

The bullet trajectory includes the progress of the bullet through the barrel of the gun following discharge or detonation and its pathway both through the air and the aim.

In the given case, Christopher Watts, a 33-year-old man residing in Frederick, the state of Colorado, was a defendant. Initially, Christopher Watts rejected his involvement in the deaths of his wife and daughters.

Parents should be held responsible for the crime of their children because in most cases criminal involvement of children is the result of lack of parental control.

Mass incarceration in the United States of America is considered one of the most important problems and the number of prisoners continues to increase.

In as much as some human rights activists often complain of the violation of the rights by the justice system, India's criminal system has faced significant changes since colonial times to the present.

It happened because of the huge differences between how the state viewed the law enforcement agent's actions and how the defense tried to protect the plaintiff.

Incarcerated Women and Abortion One of the rights that women have championed and gained in the 21st century is the right to access abortion services.

In the subsequent section, the paper suggests a method that would be utilized in understanding the effects of organized crime on the economic policies of states.

For the case of murder or crimes that necessitate capital punishment, the incentive to commit murder is directly related to the uncertainties that punishments for the crime will generate.

However, the misguided notion that anything with the potential to cause harm is immoral has led to the limited effectiveness of punitive policies with regard to the reduction of the negative impacts of drug use.

For the entrapment case to be used as a defense, the defendant should not have exhibited the intent of committing a crime prior to the entrapment.

The fact that he was put under his mother's care is rather surprising because she failed to take care of him as he was a child and suffered from a mental disease.

The decision of the court in the case of Gitlow versus New York is that it supported the arrested due to the subversive nature of the text that was published.

In this regard, the criminal justice system possesses the power to control crime and punish those who violate the law. The chapter attempts to familiarize the readers with the structure and function of the criminal [...]

The role of the police in the society is central when it comes to ensuring law and order. The policing task is the most prominent manifestation of the government and is easily recognizable by members [...]

The elements of proof for arson include motive, evidence of ownership, malicious intent, and presence of fire. The elements necessary to prove arson include malicious conduct, presence of fire, and ownership of property.

As mentioned in the introduction, building more prisons is just one of the many solutions to the problem of overcrowding in prisons.

The paper will examine the background of the case in addition to the legal point at issue and the decision of the court.

Despite the fact that RICO act had the great impact on the development of this sort of crime, there is still the necessity to struggle against it and introduce various defense practices.

Other than the problem of failure to complete jail terms, overcrowding in prisons called for the building of more prisoners to accommodate a large number of prisoners and this translated to heavy costs to the [...]

Among the reasons why it is necessary for the production of just results is the use of judges who present issues in a meaningful manner, the freedom given to opposing parties to present their issues [...]

As the review of self-defense, provocation, and diminished responsibility revealed, they refer to different circumstances in which full or partial defense may be given to an accused who committed a homicide unintentionally.

War on Drugs was a set of policies adopted by the Nixon administration in 1971, following a tremendous growth of the local illegal drug market in the 1960s, in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.

This case started as an effort to "free seven American hostages in Iran under the custody of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution".

Date rape is a domestic crime, it is a huge problem to lots of people, and it needs to be solved somehow.

The selected person serves as a mentor to the offender and takes part of the responsibility in case of recidivism. However, the chaperones should not be intimidated to conceal the signs of recidivism due to [...]

This sentence assumes that there are sufficient reasons to kill a criminal and that there is no possibility that the case can be readdressed.

Kahan, therefore, proposes that the use of shame as punishment is put to trial and if found effective, must be implemented as an alternative to the imprisonment.

Mills rightly points out that the very grounds of humanity used to support the removal of the death penalty should also be the ones used to support retaining of the sentence.

To make the matters worse they are abused and the money goes to the pockets of these greedy people as they are left empty handed after all the humiliation they go through.

Despite accounting for a small population of the world, the US has the highest number of prisoners globally. As a result, the number of prisoners under solitary confinement is higher than in other states.

In a legal sense, the defendant was not aware of either the actions or the legality of the actions that they committed during their period of automatism.

The felony murder rule should make felons more conscious of the adverse effects of crimes that they engage in and reduce the number of felonies.

It included the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Case's interpretation for extending the protections of the Bill of the Rights to states.

The initial stage in which discretion is applied in the system of criminal justice is where police officers make a decision on whether a suspect should be arrested for a particular offense or not., argues [...]

The defendant in this case, the house owner, was held responsible for a battery of injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a trespasser, who set off a spring gun set as a booby trap in an [...]

According to Holmes and Holmes, the majority of child predators "had some form of child pornography in their possession at the time of arrest".

In addition, the arrest can be made without a warrant if, a person commits the offense in the presence of a law enforcement officer.

In terms of organizational behavior studies, a criminal justice agency is seen as a system organization based on legal, social, and moral values, visions, and social environment.

Cheney's Law is a step by step account of the actions taken by Vice President Dick Cheney to enhance the executive power of the president, as the Commander in Chief in times of war.

Upon discussing the impact of money laundering, illegal drugs, and prostitution, the paper proposes the issuing of a court order restraining the use of wealth acquired from victimless crimes as one of the approaches to [...]

Privatization of the prisons may allow the prisons to expand faster because the private sector has the financial ability for the same.

The main issue raised in the letter was the absence of evidence supporting the appropriateness of the charge. Darcy was the possible initiator of the conflict, and Mr.

About a block down the street, it begins to sprinkle and Latisha opens the umbrella and realizes that it is not hers.

A judge may impose a penalty on the perpetrator according to the severity of the crime. In such instances, a convicted must pay a certain amount of money to the court.

This therefore means that punishment will only be done ones and in case the offender is tried again, it will be considered as double jeopardy.

Even though the principle of compensation that is followed in the criminal justice system of the United States is usually discussed as fair, just, and effective to address the needs of citizens who became the [...]

Police on the other hand think the high crime rates of Blacks and Hispanics only reflects the differences in the crime rates and not the biased justice system.

The jury simply decides whether the accused is guilty or innocent as charged or as proved The American constitution under the sixth amendment clarifies that the accused should enjoy the rights of a speedy and [...]

Organic evidence is obtained from the body of the victim or the perpetrator's body. At other times the evidence may be interfered with when chemical compounds are used near the crime scene to conceal the [...]

It is the duty of the investigating officer to advise the subject that constrained responses would not be admissible in future hearings by a jurist.

Even though it is not a direct representation of sexual harassment, this aspect of the issue cannot be ignored because employees have access to social media not only at home but also in the workplace.

Reports show that the crime is on the rise because more people have access to computers and the internet than ever before.

The paper at hand is devoted to the investigation of the life, personality, and criminal behavior of one of the most notorious American serial killers of 1980s-1990s, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer.

In the process of conducting the investigation, the prosecutor- and the entire investigative team- must realize that they are yet to prove the crime committed by the suspect.

Since penitentiaries began in each of the states in the United States of America, there has been a sharp increase in the number of prisoners in state prisons. The other factor contributing to the growth [...]

In this situation, it is necessary to cooperate with a lawyer to prove the absence of intent to harm or to verify the impossibility of committing a crime.

A pre-term release can negatively affect prisoners' mindsets, increase the risk of ex-inmates committing a crime and returning to prison, and be dangerous to society.

Correctional ideology is reflected in the swinging pendulum analogy because the history of criminal justice in the United States shows the oscillation between severe judicial discretion and mild rehabilitation.

It should be clear that, for an accused to "create defense because of insaneness," at the time of the acting, it must be demonstrated that the party charged with the charge worked under such a [...]

The possibility of a commutation of the sentence is the primary motivation of the accused to plead guilty to a crime.

The data available in NCVS to examine the utility of employing the NCVS to quantify white-collar crimes includes the list of white-collar crimes and their classification.

It occurs when a person "drives or takes a vehicle not his or her own, without the consent of the owner thereof, and with intent either to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner thereof of [...]

Once inside the courtroom, he sits at the bench facing the rest of the court.the defense lawyers sit in the left side of the court, close to the dock, while the prosecution sits on the [...]

Probation on the other hand is a legal punishment that is provided as part of a sentence where the convicted offender is expected to report to a probation officer regularly instead of being jailed as [...]

Vicarious liability is a term used to refer to situations where parents are punished because of the offenses committed by their children.

In criminal justice management, there are times that a person may be detained under the control of the police/ criminal justice system not because he has been proved to have committed a crime but because [...]

It is interested in the fluidity of one's behavior and the process of change. The authors point out that while other factors are also crucial to the process of developing offending behavior, one's ethnicity and [...]

The problem analyzed in the current paper is the impact of probation on the work of the officers engaged in this system.

The increased number of elderly inmates is partly due to the introduction of longer sentences in the 1970s and 1980s as US took a tough approach to crime.

The cases of female sex offenders are not unknown to the society; for example, a high school or college teacher that was accused of student's sex abuse and confronts the criminal justice system.

This paper seeks to define fraud, look at the types of fraud and the consequences of fraud to financial systems. Such fraud denies qualified job seekers places in such companies and this increases the number [...]

This is why parents and teachers have resulted to public humiliations as an alternative to the traditional form of punishment, which was only performed in private.

Secondly, the impacts of the death penalty are too severe on the lives of the victims' families and close kinsmen and on the settlement of the case.

According to the defense side of the case, the warrant that was obtained by the detectives only covered the investigation on the residence. For instance, they collected the evidence without a search warrant.

Police obtained a blood fingerprint from the defendant's room and were able to match the fingerprint to the defendant and the blood to the victim.

Overall, it can be argued that the Mapp v Ohio ruling dramatically changed the operations and behavior of state police officers by putting a stop to the admission of evidence obtained by a search in [...]

In the same year they wrote the book 'What is to be Done About Law and Order?' They said that criminology errs in assuming crime is not connected to social and economic problems in a [...]

The officer should also package information in a way that it is easy to decode and understand. Such communication enables police officers in charge of the inmates to access important information from them.

According to authorities and international organizations such as the UN, human trafficking for sexual exploitation in India is mainly internal with the country low income and lower cast communities providing the major source of victims. [...]

Restorative justice is essential in the context of the school-to-prison pipeline and the personal harm done to young people of color.

Sex trafficking is one of the most common forms of human trafficking in the U.S. Challenges affecting the enforcement of human trafficking laws in the U.S.are broad and multifaceted.

My ethos in my scholarly article was inspired by my encounters as a former teacher and my evaluations of the injustices in the justice system, particularly in schools.

In this article, the authors sought to examine the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs and their impact on the social behavior of inmates. After analysis of the results, they found that rehabilitation programs had a positive [...]

The Supreme Court inquired in the case whether Kent had a say in the juvenile court's investigation to waive jurisdiction and if it adhered to the right to due process.

In certain situations, the Parole Board will initiate the revocation procedure and provide one with a hearing for the initial revocation of the parole.

To change the trend, there is a need to develop specialty courts that will deal with these cases in the most effective and reasonable ways.

The contingency table shows the rate of violent and property crimes in North Charleston, South Carolina, compared to the national rate.

In a country that is prone to gun violence, like the United States, tourists would be scared of the unconcealed guns that the police carry around, mainly in the airports.