The Value of Using a Meta-Analysis Research Approach
Meta-analysis is “a formal study approach used by scholars to assess previous researches to acquire new conclusions about a body of research” (Borenstein, Hedges, & Rothstein, 2007, p. 2). A meta-analysis research approach delivers numerous benefits to the scholar. The approach “makes it easier for researchers to review a complex body of literature” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 5). The identified results are easy to generalize. The accuracy of every estimate is improved using new data. The researcher can use the approach to quantify the inconsistency of the results. The method makes it easier for scholars to investigate any publication bias. A thoroughly executed meta-analysis research can provide evidence-based ideas. The approach “makes it easier for researchers to integrate different findings from a wide range of studies” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 5).
The Features and Benefits of Meta-Analysis
The features of meta-analysis make it applicable in many fields. Meta-analysis “works with effect sizes” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 5). This approach examines the relationship existing between two or more study variables. Researchers can use meta-analyses to estimate rates and risks. The approach makes it easier for analysts to investigate different study features (Borenstein et al., 2007). The study method embraces the use of statistical methods. The “identification of a common statistical measure is critical for every targeted study” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 6). The study seeks to achieve greater statistical power. These features explain why meta-analyses are embraced by many researchers. The approach has a number of benefits. The targeted results can be easily generalized for bigger populations. Hypothesis testing is easily used for different study summaries. The existence of variation is explained using moderators (Borenstein et al., 2007). The researcher can use this approach to investigate the presence of any publication bias.
Specific Elements Achievable Using a Qualitative Approach
A proper qualitative approach can deliver quality findings for the targeted study. The “use of a qualitative approach will ensure the ontology drives the targeted epistemology” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 7). The epistemology will eventually support the operative paradigm. This practice can be essential in formulating the best study methodology. The researcher can focus on the subjective view of reality in order to gather the required data. A qualitative study “makes it easier for researchers to examine different human relationships in an organization” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 7). These aspects will be expressed by the targeted participants. The use of effective language will ensure the researcher understands the shared experiences of the targeted respondents.
How a Systematic Methodology Procedure Defines a Scope of the Project to Achieve Desired Outcomes
The main objective of every researcher is to achieve the best study outcomes. The best path towards conducting a successful study is having a proper methodology. A systematic methodology procedure identifies the major activities aimed at producing the best results. The systematic approach will identify the “targeted study approach, methods of data collection, data analysis techniques, and interpretation of the gathered information” (Borenstein et al., 2007, p. 25). The systematic methodology will identify how different research approaches can be combined to produce the best results. The methodology will also identify specific activities that should be completed throughout the project. The gathered information will then be used to make informed decisions. The use of a systematic methodology will ensure the study findings are used to address the issues arising from improper management.
Reference
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., & Rothstein, H. (2007). Meta-Analysis Fixed Effect vs. Random Effects. Web.