Stanley Milgram, in his research, showing that the empirically demonstrated behavior change techniques solely depend on the work of genes, temperament, personality traits, personal pathologies, and virtues. The factors listed above are the basis of any behavior, which can not be controlled with Force. The result of the Stanford Prison Experiment case studied the influence of institutional forces on the behavior and revealed that victims only obey such influence as a result of a feeling of subjection (APA 2004).
The systematic use of principles of institutional forces in order to increase the frequency of desired behaviors and/or decrease the frequency of problematic behaviors has never been positive. Ideally, social scientists extrapolate the word “epidemic” with something specific in a way that works almost with an epidemic rule for disease control. The epidemic theorists found out that the actions by which an organism adjusts to its environment can be controlled by bringing epidemic techniques rather than vigorous influence.
Rosenberg described the limitation and strength of epidemic theories: “The public-health approach to crime doesn’t hold that all criminal acts like an infectious disease. Clearly, there are neighborhoods where crime is simply endemic – where the appropriate medical analogy for homicide is not something as volatile as aids but cancer, a disease that singles out its victims steadily and implacably. There are, however, times and places where the epidemic model seems to make perfect sense.”
The mental traits of an individual that control a variety of characteristic behavior patterns (both overt and covert) in different situations and over time depend on our environment. The place and the mode of nurture are a great issue in controlling behavior, despite the influence of genes work, which is the only biological control parents could have over their children. The genetic characteristics are the basis for functional means of any behavioral proceeding; sociability, neuroticism, preciseness, cordiality, and directness to experience are the basic examples of behavioral traits associated with the genetic component of individual differences in behaviors and traits.
The trait theories described the disintegrated part of people’s theories that expose mankind’s rationale to the trend (Dr. Cervone 2001). The trait theories explain the reasons for variation in any behavioral act, which could categorize the extent of individuality. The ability to cope with adversity is not preprogrammed tendency of children and young people who are essential for species’ survival.
Psychological verve is an obscured affair that reveals the limitation of a human brain, which could scrutinize its own belief but fail to give the true picture of feelings of others. (Daniel Gilbert 2006).
That is the reason for scheming the behavior, controlling personality through resilient critical aid in order to maintain human endurance that depends on the way encouragement is made. An inevitable means of controlling behavior reside a lot with the idea of resilience. Grotberg and Mallmann conclude that the best places where children and young people develop resiliency are schools. The self-theory of Carl Rogers shows that a human’s behavior does not base only on what he sees but the means attached to it are foremost (Dr. Cervone 2001). The brain activity has the ability to process or decode the factors experienced.
Brain does not have the ability to determine the exact way the other body parts feel after any of our action. Although people react to any information coming to their mind, this has never helped to control the role hatred, intolerance, average and deceitful play in a behavioral act. According to Daniel Gilbert conclusion “until we learn to stop trusting everything our brains tells us about others – and to start trusting others themselves – there will continue to be tears and recriminations in the way back.” The significance of the study conducted by Sukhwinder Shergill and his colleague at University College London, on Force at which an organism adjusts to its environment, revealed that “escalation was the natural by product of a neurological quirk that causes the pain we receive to seem more painful than the pain we produce… “(Daniel Gilbert 2006).
Ideally human behavior can be controlled in several ways except any forceful act or any way other than for care and correction. Likewise should be stated that despite the strong feeling one can still maintain self-conscious emotions. Daniel Gilbert expressed the idea in this notion:” It is simple to say that basic principles of human psychology are important ingredients in this miserable stew. Until we learn to stop trusting everything our brains tell us about others – and to start trusting others themselves – there will continue to be tears and recriminations in the way back.”
To make a conclusion, it would not be out of place to say that the experience that results in a relatively permanent change in behavioral potential or the way organism adjusts to its surroundings are determined by environment. It especially concerns a system facilitating the beliefs and values which ensures that individuals will fulfill their obligations given to other people and will behave in ways that do not violate the rights and interests of others. This research paper is very important for people who are already studying or about to study psychology because it reveals basic features of a human mind the knowledge of which can be called fundamental for the process of further study.
Works Cited
American Psychological Association. 2004. Demonstrating The Power of social Situations via a Simulated Prison Experiment at Psychology. Web.
Daniel, Gilbert.He Who Cast First Stone Probably Didn’t. 2006. International Herald Tribune. Web.
Why Is The City Suddenly So Much Safer Could It Be That Crime Really Is An Epidemic? 1996 The Tipping Point. Web.
Alliance International HIV /AIDS. 2004. Resiliency. Web.
Dr. Cervone. Psych 210: Theories of Personality. Parental Influences on Personality: A Comparison of Trait and Phenomenological Theories. (2001). SS# 123-45-6789.