Case Background
An IT firm is developing a competitive social media product with features matching an existing platform and additional functions requested by the marketing team. With intense competition and rapidly evolving technology, the final product must be completed within a year.
Justification for Chosen Methodology
Agile project management, and especially Scrum, is the best option for the provided situation in which an IT company must create a competitive social network platform in under a year. The competitive nature of the sector, the quick pace of technical innovation, and the ever-changing needs of the market all played a role in the decision to go with this particular project management system.
Flexibility
One of Agile’s greatest strengths is how well it adapts to new circumstances. Being flexible enough to adjust rapidly to shifting needs and market trends is essential in today’s dynamic social media and technological scene (Shastri et al., 2021). Scrum, an iterative methodology inside the Agile framework, makes it easier to respond to changing requirements and feedback by breaking the development process down into short, time-bound iterations called sprints.
Long-Term
Scrum’s iterative methodology for development fits well inside the project’s year-long timetable. The team is able to provide a potentially shippable product increment at the conclusion of each sprint because they have broken down the development process into manageable increments. This iterative cycle reduces the possibility of creating a product that doesn’t meet customers’ needs and keeps you in step with market trends.
Collaborative Decision-Making
One of Agile’s many benefits is the way it facilitates group decision-making. Scrum’s focus on frequent communication and cooperation among team members and stakeholders ensures that the development is aligned with the growing requirements, especially given the importance of the marketing team’s involvement in this particular project. This allows the marketing team to easily request and implement new features or make changes in response to customer feedback. Given the unpredictability of technological development and consumer tastes, Agile’s proactive risk management strategy is very crucial. Risks may be identified and mitigated early with the help of Agile techniques’ built-in mechanisms for regular monitoring, retrospectives, and flexibility.
Quick Product Launch
Last but not least, in the cutthroat world of social media, a quicker time-to-market is crucial. Scrum, a kind of Agile, assures frequent, useful product releases by breaking down large projects into smaller, more manageable chunks (Shastri et al., 2021). In comparison to more conventional Waterfall methods, this one allows for quicker iteration and delivery of a product in response to customer feedback.
Impact of Chosen Methodology vs. Traditional Project Management
Project Schedule
Scrum deviates greatly from conventional approaches to project scheduling. The phases of a traditional technique like Waterfall must be completed in order before going on to the next. Instead, Scrum breaks the project into sprints, which are shorter iterations with a predetermined length. These cycles, which typically span between two and four weeks, make it possible to constantly create and produce potentially shippable increments.
The delay in the project timeline will be significant. Requirement changes are notoriously difficult to incorporate in the classic Waterfall paradigm and may potentially cause delays. Scrum, on the other hand, allows for adjustments to be made at the start of each sprint, making for a more malleable and adaptable timetable (Shastri et al., 2021). With this iterative method, changes may be made quickly, decreasing the likelihood of schedule overruns and accelerating the product’s time to market.
Risk
Scrum is one of the Agile approaches that take a more proactive and adaptable approach to risk management than more conventional project management practices. Any problems that develop after the planning phase have the potential to derail the whole project under the Waterfall approach.
However, Scrum integrates risk management at all stages of the project.
Sprint reviews, and retrospectives are where Scrum identifies and addresses risks. The project team is able to deal with new hazards as they arise, thanks to their vigilant monitoring and responsiveness to changing conditions. Scrum’s iterative structure also allows for the testing of assumptions and hypotheses at an early point of the development process, decreasing the chance of catastrophic late-stage failures. This guarantees a more robust and risk-conscious method of project management (Akhtar et al., 2022).
Cost
Scrum has a very different approach to budgeting than more conventional approaches to project management. In conventional approaches, a thorough plan is developed in advance, and expenses are evaluated based on the whole scope of the project. If the project’s scope or needs need to be altered in any way, more time and money will be needed to revise the original plan.
Scrum is an incremental and iterative method to handle budgeting. As the project is broken down into sprints, the costs associated with each sprint may be estimated in advance. Additionally, requirements may be adjusted at the start of each sprint without substantially affecting project expenses. The project’s finances may be planned and managed with more precision because of this flexibility (Akhtar et al., 2022).
When compared to more conventional approaches to project management, Scrum may have a significant effect on efficiency. In conventional approaches, teams work sequentially through the stages of a project, with resources given depending on the overall project’s scope. This might lead to inefficient use of resources in certain phases of a project while they are wasted in others.
Resources
Scrum’s emphasis on self-managing, cross-functional teams helps maximize productivity. Team members with a wide range of experience work closely together to make the most of everyone’s unique set of talents throughout the project. Scrum’s iterative design also permits constant re-prioritization of resources in response to changing project needs. When the proper talents are deployed at the right moment, resource efficiency improves, and productivity rises. Agile, and especially Scrum, takes a different tack when it comes to tracking and monitoring progress on projects. Waterfall projects are often evaluated based on how well they are following the initial blueprint (Khalid et al., 2020.) It might be difficult to resolve concerns swiftly if deviations from the plan aren’t spotted until later stages.
Monitoring and Tracking of Project Work
Scrum’s focus on openness and visibility allows for constant tracking and monitoring of project progress. The team is always up-to-date on its progress, obstacles, and potential for growth due to daily stand-up meetings, sprint reviews, and periodic retrospectives (Akhtar et al., 2022). This recurrent feedback loop allows for rapid course corrections and keeps the project on track. By increasing transparency, visual tools like Kanban boards facilitate the detection of bottlenecks and other problem areas.
Department Culture
Agile approaches have an effect beyond project management that may be felt across an organization. The decision-making process in conventional project management tends to be top-down and hierarchical. Because of this, teamwork and communication may suffer; the framework emphasizes open communication, shared responsibility, and constant refinement. Scrum’s focus on self-organizing, cross-functional teams promotes transparency and joint responsibility (Akhtar et al., 2022). Team members have the chance to express their issues, provide their thoughts, and work together to improve procedures at regular rituals like sprint reviews and retrospectives. By encouraging everyone to pitch in and do their part, companies may boost employee morale and happiness at work.
Project Leadership in the Chosen Methodology
Scrum places a premium on transformational project leadership. Agile emphasizes servant leadership, in which the leader serves the team by eliminating roadblocks and promoting cooperation rather than imposing their will from on high as in conventional top-down techniques.
Role of Transformative Leadership in Project Success
Particularly useful in Agile, transformational leadership encourages experimentation, flexibility, and constant progress. In an Agile setting, a transformational leader instills confidence in team members, promotes honest dialogue, and motivates everyone toward a common goal. This type of leadership is consistent with Agile principles, and it helps teams maintain high morale, stay motivated, and complete projects via collaborative, self-directed work.
References
Akhtar, A., Bakhtawar, B., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Extreme programming vs Scrum: A comparison of Agile models. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), 2(2). Web.
Khalid, A., Butt, S. A., Jamal, T., & Gochhait, S. (2020). Agile Scrum issues at large-scale distributed projects. International Journal of Software Innovation, 8(2), 85–94. Web.
Shastri, Y., Hoda, R., & Amor, R. (2021). Spearheading agile: the role of the scrum master in agile projects. Empirical Software Engineering, 26(1). Web.
Loading...
