Introduction
The purpose of the study is to identify various issues affecting BlackBerry’s leadership and present recommendations for improvement. One of the primary issues to address is the importance of adapting to shifting market trends and evolving customer needs. Leadership’s failure to adapt to the trends contributed to the company’s failure. Another issue for BlackBerry’s leadership team to focus on is maintaining a balance between short-term and long-term goals. The company was more focused on achieving short-term gains rather than long-term sustainability.
One of the recommendations that BlackBerry’s leadership team has to consider is changing its leadership approach from strategic to implicit. This will enable leaders to have a good understanding of the perspectives and expectations of their followers. The leadership team should also consider aligning short-term goals with the achievement of long-term ones. This will play a significant role in promoting both sustainability and profitability.
Case Study Narrative
Blackberry dominated the mobile phone market with its secure messaging system and keyboard-based handsets. The corporation failed to adapt to changing consumer demands and technological advancements, which ultimately led to its demise. Businesspeople and government officials who required safe and reliable mobile communication used BlackBerry. The brand’s messaging system, which used a unique PIN system, was secure and a selling feature. Blackberry’s physical keyboard appealed to tactile typists.
Blackberry failed to adapt to the smartphone industry, which has proven to be profitable in the long run. The corporation lagged behind Apple and Android in touchscreen adoption and operating system modernization. The company also neglected its app ecosystem, which impacted consumer purchasing decisions.
Blackberry lost market share to creative and consumer-focused competitors, which were focused on aligning with market needs and trends. The firm released the BlackBerry 10 operating system in 2013 to save the brand; however, it failed to attract customers. Blackberry became a niche player after failing to switch to software and services. It now provides enterprise security and communication services, rather than manufacturing devices.
The rise and fall of BlackBerry serve as a sobering lesson on the value of creativity and adaptability in a rapidly changing market. Although the business was once a leader in mobile communication technology, it finally fell behind and became irrelevant in the market. The major leadership lesson in the Blackberry story is the value of responding to shifting market trends and customer preferences. The leadership of Blackberry ultimately contributed to the company’s demise by failing to understand the transition towards touchscreens and the significance of a strong app ecosystem in the smartphone sector.
A deep understanding of industry trends and a desire to innovate and adapt to evolving client needs are essential prerequisites for effective leadership. Blackberry’s leadership was overly preoccupied with preserving its current business model. This led the company to neglect the need to invest in creating new goods and services that could compete with emerging market players.
The value of striking a balance between short-term and long-term objectives is another leadership lesson that can be drawn from the Blackberry case study. The company’s leadership made several strategic choices that prioritized short-term success over long-term sustainability, such as the decision to release the BlackBerry 10 operating system rather than investing in more progressive developments. As competitors continued to surpass BlackBerry in terms of innovation and market appeal, this strategy ultimately proved unsustainable. A focus on both short- and long-term objectives is vital for effective leadership, as is a readiness to make strategic investments in innovation and growth that may not yield immediate returns but are essential for long-term success. The leadership of Blackberry ultimately led to the company’s collapse and loss of market supremacy by failing to place a high priority on innovation and adaptation.
Complexity of Leadership Theory
The article emphasizes the complexity of leadership theory and the difficulties of rigorous examination. The philosophical foundations of leadership theory vary widely depending on the researcher. Some researchers believe leadership is innate, while others consider it a social and cultural construct (Knights & Willmott, 1992). The leadership research approach relies on a research question to identify the needs of both consumers and followers. Self-report questionnaires, observational data, and experimental approaches are used in some studies to collect data for informed conclusions.
The different complexities have changed leadership theory from focusing on the best leadership practices to recognizing the diversity of leadership styles and the importance of situational factors. The case study highlights the importance of evaluating leadership approaches within the specific context of each firm. The most appropriate way to lead an organization depends on its culture, goals, and external environment. This case study requires a detailed understanding of the organization’s unique challenges and the ability to adapt leadership techniques to changing conditions. Depending on the organization and its stakeholders, this may include using various leadership theories and practices.
Identifying Issues
Strategic leadership theory is a management theory that focuses on the activities and behaviors of leaders responsible for guiding organizations toward their goals. According to this theory, effective leaders must possess a specific set of abilities and behaviors that help them orient in complex and uncertain environments (Tipurić, 2022). It also enables them to develop and implement strategies that enable their companies to achieve sustained success.
The approach requires leaders to engage in strategic thinking, which entails evaluating complex issues and identifying both possibilities and risks (Nyong’a & Maina, 2019). This makes it easier to establish strategies that align with the organization’s vision and objectives. A leader needs to have a clear and compelling vision for their followers to feel inspired and motivated towards achieving the desired objectives. A vision is an articulation of the intended future condition of the organization, as well as a provision of a road map for how to get there.
One of the implications identified from the assigned case study, which strategic leadership theory can be used to make sense of, is the importance of adapting to changing market trends and customer preferences. Blackberry’s leadership team was responsible for the company’s demise because they failed to recognize a movement in the industry towards the use of touchscreens that supported a rich app ecosystem. The firm’s leaders were reluctant to tap into the expansion of the consumer smartphone market since profits were smaller than in the consumer market (Himsel & Inkpen, 2017). As a result, the company did not capitalize on the rise of the consumer smartphone market. Because the company in question failed to adapt to shifting market trends, it was unable to maintain its competitive edge in the rapidly growing market.
According to the strategic leadership theory, effective leaders are required to possess a set of abilities and behaviors that enable them to navigate the complexities and uncertainties of the environments in which they operate. These abilities consist of continual learning and adaptability, as well as strategic thinking, visioning, planning, and implementation (O’Shannassy, 2021). Leaders who succeed in these areas are better positioned to predict and respond to change, recognize and capitalize on new opportunities, and mitigate the impact of risks and threats (Mwendwa, 2021). This indicates that leaders from BlackBerry failed in strategic leadership theory, as they did not initiate any strategies to adapt to emerging market trends. This made it challenging for the company to attract new customers and convert them into sales, a necessary step for growth.
Strategic leadership theory can also be applied to understand the importance of organizational leaders balancing short-term and long-term goals. BlackBerry’s leadership team set strategic goals that prioritized achieving short-term payoffs rather than long-term ones. This explains why the leaders chose to develop the BlackBerry 10 operating system rather than focusing on more forward-thinking innovations. The various decisions made by the company’s management team led to unsustainable operations that were not appealing to the target audience.
Strategic leadership theory recognizes that short-term goals are a crucial component of an organization’s overall strategy. It also indicates that placing too much emphasis on achieving short-term gains can bring about dangers at the expense of long-term success (Craig, 2019). Although short-term goals can be useful for motivating and aligning team members, it is not certain that they will align with the long-term vision and objectives of the organization.
In some situations, short-term objectives may even be at odds with the long-term interests of the business. This was the case for BlackBerry, as its leaders were more concentrated on reaching short-term gains rather than long-term ones. The company’s executives implemented a corporate strategy that was characterized by short-term plans discussed privately. Strategic leaders need to have the ability to strike a balance between the requirement for long-term growth and sustainability and the need for short-term outcomes. This requires a commitment to invest in the company’s future, even if it means forgoing some short-term benefits.
Recommendations
Having identified the factors that contributed to BlackBerry’s failure, the report proceeds to highlight some of the recommendations that can be implemented within the organization. One of the recommendations that the firm’s top executives have to consider is changing their leadership approach from strategic leadership to implicit leadership.
Implicit leadership theory examines the ideas and assumptions people hold regarding the qualities and actions necessary for effective leadership (Kenney, Schwartz-Kenney, and Blascovich, 1996). These ideas are frequently formed as a result of personal experiences, socialization, and societal standards, and the majority of them are either unconscious or implicit. The theory focuses on distinguishing individuals with leadership capabilities from those who do not have them (Lord, Foti, and De Vader, 1984). The concept of ILT has been developed over many years and is being utilized extensively in the field of leadership studies and practice.
Under ILT, people tend to construct a mental image of what an ideal leader looks like, based on their experiences and observations of successful leaders. They then evaluate a leader’s effectiveness by contrasting their mental image of that leader with the actual behavior of that leader, and deciding whether or not the leader is effective. This mental image or prototype of a leader can vary significantly depending on the culture and situation in which it is used, and it can also shift over time (Shen, 2019).
ILT suggests that human beings tend to categorize things and people based on their features before making judgments and decisions about them. This process of classification is influenced by social and cultural factors, such as stereotypes and expectations, which shape how people perceive and evaluate leaders (Reichard et al., 2021). These factors can also influence how people categorize different types of individuals in their environment.
Proper utilization of ILT in an organizational setting is necessary for leaders to know the beliefs and assumptions made by their followers. This allows a leader to align their behaviors with the expectations held by other team members (Da’as et al., 2021). In this case, a leader who is aware of ILT is more likely to act in a manner that inspires followers to handle their roles as expected. ILT can also be used to foster communication and collaboration between leaders and their followers, ensuring they work together to achieve common goals.
When a leader wants to bring about changes in the workplace, ILT can be quite helpful in accomplishing that goal. It is simple for a leader to communicate with their followers to disseminate information regarding required changes (Tavares et al., 2018). This reduces the possibility of resistance. ILT is a resource that organizational leaders can rely on to modify their behaviors and become more effective in their respective roles. It can also help leaders gain a better understanding of the expectations their followers have of them, which in turn can help create a more positive and productive work environment.
It will also be necessary for the leadership team in ILT to balance short-term and long-term goals. Instead of concentrating on the long-term objectives essential for achieving sustainable growth, the team was more focused on implementing short-term objectives (Martin, 2019). A focus on short-term profits may help explain why BlackBerry ultimately experienced decreased profitability and growth, which led to the company’s demise. Ensuring that both short-term and long-term goals are well-defined is one of the key ways the leadership team can help achieve a balance between the two types of objectives (Schölin, Norrman, and Järplind, 2022). This will help define priorities and make informed judgments regarding the trade-offs that need to be made between short-term and long-term goals.
Blackberry leaders can also consider aligning short-term gains with the achievement of long-term ones. This will play a big role in ensuring that the organization is progressing in the appropriate direction (Karkaria, 2018). The focus of short-term objectives is on achieving results as quickly as possible, such as increasing profitability, enhancing customer satisfaction, and reducing expenses.
On the other hand, long-term benefits aim to achieve increased organizational growth while simultaneously establishing a solid reputation for the brand. BlackBerry’s ability to maintain its balance will help ensure that the company continues to be profitable even as it adopts tactics designed to reach future objectives (Zucker, 2021). Leaders can also achieve desired behavior in followers by emphasizing the interdependence between short and long-term organizational goals (Ellemers, De Gilder, and Haslam, 2004). By adhering to this approach, one is likely to reduce the likelihood of engaging in short-term methods that create obstacles to achieving future goals.
Conclusion
This report concludes that the strategic leadership applied at BlackBerry was not effective, as the leaders were unable to keep pace with changing trends and customer preferences. The leaders focused more on conquering the corporate market rather than the consumer one, which has turned out to be profitable. In this case, BlackBerry should consider implementing ILT to ensure that the strategies implemented by leaders align with the interests of their followers and the organization. The report also found that BlackBerry was more focused on short-term gains rather than prolonged sustainability. This suggests that leaders must achieve a balance between short-term and long-term goals to foster sustainability.
Reference List
Craig, W. (2019). Strategic leadership: short-term stability and long-term viability. Forbes. Web.
Da’as, R., A., et al. (2021). ‘Implicit leadership theory: principals’ sense-making and cognitive complexity. International Journal of Educational Management,’ 35(3), pp.726-740. Web.
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D. and Haslam, S.A., (2004). ‘Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance.’ Academy of Management Review, 29(3), pp.459-478. Web.
Himsel, D., and Inkpen, D. (2017). The rise and fall of Blackberry. Thunderbird School of Global Management.
Karkaria, H. 2018. Linkedin.com. (2018). Leadership – balancing short-term gains v/s long-term strategy. Web.
Kenney, R.A., Schwartz-Kenney, B.M. and Blascovich, J., (1996). ‘Implicit leadership theories: defining leaders described as worthy of influence’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), pp.1128-1143. Web.
Knights, D. and Willmott, H., (1992). ‘Conceptualizing leadership processes: a study of senior managers in a financial services company’, Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), pp.761-782. Web.
Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J. and De Vader, C.L., (1984). ‘A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions’, Organizational behavior and human performance, 34(3), pp.343-378. Web.
Martin, J. (2019). Long-term goals vs. short-term goals [the pros and cons]. Web.
Mwendwa, C. (2021). Strategic Leadership Practices and performance of Standard Group Plc(Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). Web.
Nyong’a, T.M. and Maina, R., (2019). ‘Influence of strategic leadership on strategy implementation at Kenya Revenue Authority, southern region in Kenya’, International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 3(5), pp.128-159. Web.
O’Shannassy, T., (2021). ‘The challenges of strategic leadership in organizations’, Journal of Management & Organization, 27(2), pp.235-238. Web.
Reichard, R.J., et al. (2021). ‘Changes in implicit leadership theory constellations throughout a developmental experience’, Journal of Leadership Education DOI, 10(V20/I4). Web.
Schölin, C., Norrman, K., and Järplind, F. (2022). The role of strategic leadership in organizational adaptation during Covid-19 pandemic: a single case study of Åhléns AB. Web.
Shen, W., (2019). ‘Personal and situational antecedents of workers’ implicit leadership theories: a within-person, between-jobs design’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), pp.204-216. Web.
Tavares, G.M., Sobral, F., Goldszmidt, R. and Araújo, F., (2018). ‘Opening the implicit leadership theories’ black box: an experimental approach with conjoint analysis’, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, p.100. Web.
Tipurić, D., (2022). ‘The rise of strategic leadership’, in The enactment of strategic leadership: a critical perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 55-92
Zucker, R. (2021). ‘How to maintain focus on long-term goals in a short-term world’, Forbes. Web.