This essay will evaluate the similarities and dissimilarities between the concepts that were established in the essay ‘Memex Revisited’ by Vannevar Bush and the article ‘Personal Dynamic Media’ by Alan Kay and Adele Goldberg. In the essay ‘Memex Revisited’, the author has suggested a piece of personal computer equipment for individual custom rather than the huge workstations that were serving the entire organizations. Moreover, the author has proposed that it would assist a person’s day-to-day contemplations unswervingly; fitting in with the standard thought courses of a man, rather than simply perform errands and every day’s simple jobs for him. The author supposes the memex would manage the quantity of information that people inset into it; the memex is supposed to study from its own skill and to improve its own imprints (Bush, n.d.).
The author claims that she will rely on the information that has already been retrieved in order to look ahead to the memex. Apparatuses of the present day divide into two pronounced disunions: firstly, there are those that enhance forces and senses of the person; and secondly, there are those that assist his thoughts. According to Vannevar Bush, the researchers do not require contending with the prior, even despite the fact that they have created our contemporary advancements along with all its welfares and its menaces possible for existence. The last are every now and then contained within the overall description of a thinking machine concept; however, this appears to be quite an ill-starred countenance, as they are not able to contemplate, they simply assist a person in doing so. They are of two kinds, analytical pieces of machinery, and data-handling pieces of machinery and these two kinds are united in a machine that possesses both analytical and data-handling capabilities from time to time.
In the article ‘Personal Dynamic Media’ by Alan Kay and Adele Goldberg the authors presented the concept of a Dynabook, the first notebook computer that would be a general-purpose device that could have been used by very different kind of people. The authors imply that the Dynabook would possess the suppleness and generalization of the strictly personal tool, joined with implements that would possess the supremacy of the mass tools that are for general use (Kay & Golberg, 1977). The authors of the ‘Personal Dynamic Media’ had established the goals of the research, which are: to deliver intelligible instances of the appliance of their product within issue expanses; to examine how the product could be applied to support the pictorial and aural abilities; to deliver incomparable liberty of admittance so children would have an ability to devote countless time searching for specifics; and to evaluate the unforeseen appliance of the Dynabook and Smalltalk by youngsters. The overall variety of potential handlers of the technology is so excessive that every endeavor to explicitly taking into consideration their requests and demands in the project of the Dynabook in advance would inevitably culminate in a catastrophic feature-laden assortment that would not be actually appropriate and apposite for any person.
References
Bush, Vannevar. (n.d.). Memex Revisited. Web.
Kay, A., & Golberg, A. (1977). Personal Dynamic Media. Computer, 10(3), 31-41.