Suzanne’s article on the interrelationship between beauty and business highlights the difficulties that leaders encounter when presented with an opportunity to draw. The report indicates that using art for professional progress is an intricate task. Evidently, the report begins by providing a brief history on the discovery of artistry in the Polaroid creativity lab as a means of perpetuating innovation.
It then discusses insight art, which is a convenient approach to art-based instruction used in the Polaroid creativity lab. Furthermore, the article focuses on active observation processes, which are recorded in a notebook. Drawing as a powerful technique in recording observations is also noted.
Concurrently, deriving aesthetic value from drawings and using such a skill to judge ideas in a practical business idea is important in attaining business success. Lastly, the report presents an example of the previous participants of insight art and the benefits enjoyed.
An in depth critique of this article would require an understanding of the difference in meaning between the words artistry and beauty. In the article, the intertwined usage of the words artistry and beauty is frequent.
Conversely, in the world of fine arts, these terms exude several dissimilarities. In the description of artistic things, the word aesthetic would be more appropriate. Anything artistic is beautiful, but beauty is more of an attribute of something that pleases the viewer’s senses. Incredible inventive would unleash the same sensational feeling notwithstanding other additives.
While beauty emphasizes an attractive nature, aesthetic attribute cover both bodily attractiveness and non-attractive aspects that could be rugged but desirable. Something artistic would unleash such feelings as admiration, enjoyment, shame, and dread. It is not agreeable that something dreadful is beautiful while something aesthetic could be fearful.
The use of art to instigate innovativeness among executives is a difficult endeavor. The ability of persons to note the aesthetic value of objects in their surroundings repeatedly qualifies them as candidates for the procedure. It is my belief that in the contemporary society, artistry is an incomparable and rare talent. It is easier to identify beautiful things but few would note the aesthetic character of their own surrounding. The article makes the adoption of artistic ability such an easy procedure, something that is easily disagreeable superficially.
Insight into the article indicates that it compares other common innovation methodologies with insight art. Innovation methodologies were truly excellent. However, they were deficient in vital innovation development procedure. These procedures are reported as too mechanical and lacking the ability to indulge the participants creatively.
Reportedly, imaginative art fills this void by providing a meaningful link between workers and their jobs. However, the perceived tendency of the writer to shun these procedures appears baseless. The backwardness brought a bout by a single negativity does not merit the obvious disqualification of these ancient procedures.
Evidently, insight art is a procedural technique that focuses on unifying minds and hearts of the participants by transferring them from their sublime to an innovative status. The technique is based on the ability to identify the aesthetic factor also called, the A factor. According to Suzanne, the A factor comprise eight attributes of beauty.
The article records these attributes as vitality, luminosity, unity in variety, complexity, utility, simplicity, synchronicity and sublimity. Looking at this A factors critically, they all tend to suggest the need for a stronger relationship between an individual and his job. In fostering any business policy, this is an exceptionally imperative calculated administration tool.
According to the writer, a three-step path cultivates these attributes. First, the compilation of information through observation, then making a connection between the observations and true business situations follows. Finally, initiating choices based on the identified A factors concludes the process. All these are procedures that require a slight artistic ability.
However, it is a known fact that a vast majority of the population do not have any artistic skills. It would be imperative to note that only individual with vast artistic skills who go through this procedure would flourish. Evidently, this locks out a full-size majority with skills vital in strategic management but devoid of any artistry. Additionally, the three steps would prove inefficient for full transformation of such individuals.
The report indicates that, insight art is a crucial tool in achieving outlined goals in strategic management. The writer reports that the procedure enables participants to identify negative space. This is crucial as it denotes areas that need strengthening; furthermore, points to the intended direction.
Indeed, the recognition of artistic aspects allows managers to determine the quality aspects devoid in their business. Beauty is an individual opinion not shared by many. However, aesthetic attributes are universal opinions about procedures. Corporate training should aim at enabling individuals to create attractive procedures.