Introduction
The sphere of heavy equipment in business has various applications, ranging from the agricultural and economic sectors to those related to space. When considering the leaders in this field as a whole, several companies can be identified whose market capitalization significantly outperforms that of their competitors. These include the construction and mining equipment manufacturer Caterpillar, the thermoelectric and press machines manufacturer Komatsu, a company specializing in hydraulic and excavation equipment, such as Volvo, and the Japanese conglomerate Hitachi, which manufactures loading, breaking, and carrying devices.
However, among these companies, Caterpillar is the leader, with a market capitalization value of $135 billion, while its nearest competitor, John Deere, which manufactures agricultural and forestry machinery, falls behind by almost $10 billion (Macrotrends, 2023a; Macrotrends, 2023b). Accordingly, at present, Caterpillar can be considered the market leader in heavy equipment, without being tied to a specific industry or human activity. The figures listed by Volvo, Hitachi, and Komatsu are at least twice as low as Caterpillar’s capitalization.
Historically, the picture is similar: Caterpillar occupies the first lines, and the graph of past values is characterized by a slight spread in dynamics, except for a notable jump in 2021, which is typical for more specialized companies, such as Caterpillar, John Deere, and Komatsu. Volvo and Hitachi also experienced a slight drop in 2020, likely due to the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, but did not show a similar bounce in the long run (Macrotrends, 2023c; Macrotrends, 2023d). The larger size of the company implies less exposure to risks due to its comprehensive financial capabilities, which are separately assessed by liquidity, leverage, and profitability indicators. Caterpillar has been the market leader for a long time, so its significant market capitalization is fully justified at the moment.
Considering this fact, it can be said that the company is the leader of its industry, as it not only holds the largest share worldwide but also leads in innovation and growth. Caterpillar is a pioneer in innovation and environmental responsibility, converting even the most demanding machines and mechanisms to electric energy and developing mining management technologies (Caterpillar Inc., 2021). The combination of these financial, reputational, and innovative success factors makes the company the market leader in all respects, while leaving many opportunities to maintain this position due to the relatively high ratio of key financial indicators.
Caterpillar Inc. has reached record levels of profitability, similar to those of its competitor, Deere. 2021 and 2022 show the best sales and highest net income (Macrotrends, 2023a; Macrotrends, 2023b). At the same time, Deere demonstrates slightly higher relative gross and operating profit margins, which indicates a competitor’s better optimization of these processes. On the other hand, Caterpillar’s business is slightly more diversified than its closest competitor; therefore, it requires more suppliers and complex logistics and production processes, which may result in additional costs. Accordingly, at the moment, Caterpillar is stable in terms of business profitability, despite a slight lag behind the nearest pursuer in terms of market capitalization.
However, Caterpillar’s position in 2016 was shaky in this respect. First, net income fell into the negative for the first time, a phenomenon that did not occur among competitors even during the COVID-19 pandemic (Macrotrends, 2023a; Macrotrends, 2023b). At the same time, Caterpillar has historically achieved significantly higher operating and gross profits than its closest competitors; however, it has not maintained this lead for an extended period. Such changeable dynamics can be driven by constant technological progress, which occasionally requires significant expenses for R&D and other instances, reshaping logistics routes and substantially affecting operating costs. Being at the forefront of the market, Caterpillar must provide innovative solutions, which, in some cases, serve as the driving force behind its success. Implementing these technologies will result in a short-term decrease in sales figures; however, given the company’s experience, this is unlikely to impact its market position significantly.
From an investor’s point of view, an important indicator is earnings per share, which is also comparable to the average of all competitors listed in the industry above. However, it should be noted that the businesses of Volvo and Hitachi are much more diversified compared to those of Caterpillar and Deere, as these companies operate in related areas of automotive and electronic products, respectively. Accordingly, their operating, gross, and net profit margins are lower than market leaders Deere and Caterpillar (Macrotrends, 2023c; Macrotrends, 2023d).
The number of available shares of these lagging competitors is also much larger than that of the organization considered in this paper, which reduces the EPS in absolute terms. Given this disparity in the number of shares available on the market, it is challenging to calculate an industry average to determine whether shares are undervalued or overvalued. Therefore, it is necessary to rely on the company’s potential for profitability and its innovative agenda, which Caterpillar excels in. For at least portfolio diversification purposes to save funds, this investment is justified. However, this assertion requires further analysis.
Caterpillar’s product lines include new equipment, parts, and used items, as well as an industry-standard diversification into merchandising. Caterpillar apparel and footwear are of high quality and serve as an additional source of income for the company in various markets due to the brand’s strength and experience in atypical conditions. In addition to the products in the form of heavy engines, Caterpillar offers outsourcing technologies in these areas, as well as power systems, making it possible to close specific turnkey work projects. Unlike its close rival, Deere, which also has a strong track record of digital solutions, the competition does not offer power supplies or diversify into merchandising.
Although competitors’ areas only partially overlap, Caterpillar has a broader range of heavy equipment models, represented by 23 types. According to the annual report for 2022, the energy, transportation, and resource sectors are the most promising and give significant growth in sales, which is caused by a change in several external factors in the market, requiring, due to the pandemic and, for example, the East European conflict, a focus on domestic production, adaptation of alternative energy sources and other local logistics solutions (Ardolino et al., 2022; Catrerpillar Inc, 2023; Lim et al., 2022).
The construction industry, which generates the most profit for the company, is experiencing less significant growth due to increased orders in the e-commerce segment, innovative implementations of automated processes, and the release of battery-powered models (Caterpillar Inc., 2023). For the most part, green start-up innovation for electric machines is a crucial driver of Caterpillar’s growth today, driven by an increasing emphasis on the need for a global environmental focus (Nathaniel et al., 2021). Satisfying the growing demand in this industry requires long-term and balanced decisions. The organization’s focus on this direction anticipates current trends, contributing to sales growth.
For the investor, first and foremost, the quantitative indicators of success play a role, which, in the case of Caterpillar, is easier to predict due to its involvement in the global market, which is subject to critical global factors. The demand for electrical heavy equipment, as well as similar power and energy opportunities, is a vital sector at present, where innovation will play a critical role in maintaining the growth rate of sales for such companies. It is in these sectors that Caterpillar demonstrates growth by almost a quarter, which is a natural consequence and a good signal for investment.
Given the broader diversification of Hitachi and Volvo, whose significant projects may be focused on other sectors, including security and artificial intelligence, even the closest competitor, Deere, operates in somewhat related areas, conceding in the context of a lack of an energy solution. While the listed competitors may succeed in the exchange market due to other factors in segments where demand can grow at a rapid pace, the potential is much more comprehensive with Caterpillar, as it responds to global, not just local, economic and environmental trends.
Investment Analysis
According to experts, Caterpillar Inc.’s shares are currently undervalued on the market. A detailed analysis involving competitor Deere shows that Caterpillar’s historically low P/E suggests, with medium risk, significant growth over the next year and a half (Long, 2023). These companies primarily rely on government procurement and related infrastructure costs in the US, and despite several macroeconomic shocks, their shares retain their potential, as they are now relatively undervalued.
At the same time, Caterpillar in the portfolio should be considered precisely as a long-term asset, since potential profits are typically accumulated for at least a dozen months. However, against the backdrop of Deere, the expert notices a slight lag in Caterpillar’s attractiveness to investors, as he sees more potential in Deere’s technologies and direct functionality through investments in artificial intelligence and cloud services (Long, 2023). At the same time, Caterpillar shares are quoted significantly higher than those of other competitors, even though they have already partially exhausted their short-term upside potential.
In this regard, the company’s market perception is currently low-key. Stocks have risen over the past 90 days, suggesting either a plateau or a slight pullback in the future. The best time to invest in Caterpillar would have been in April 2023, when the organization’s value exceeded market expectations (Macroaxis, 2023a).
At the same time, according to experts, risks remain at an average level with relatively low returns, a characteristic typical of shares of this kind. In many ways, profound breakthroughs depend on the company’s success in the field of critical innovations, and here Deere is considered more promising: competitors are investing in artificial intelligence in an area directly related to the subsistence of the population, which, with a growing demographic, can become a determining factor (Long, 2023).
At the same time, during the current increase in Caterpillar stock prices, there were growth determinants that limited short-term potential, such as New Zealand’s infrastructure development plan, which implies increased investment in this industry, or investment by CM Wealth Advisers (Macroaxis, 2023a). Such a background, with financial stability, ensures at least two years of absence from severe crises for this company. This, combined with the fact that shares are typically held by institutions such as insurance companies, means that Caterpillar, despite low returns, is in an excellent position to invest. Although some decline is expected at the moment, when diversifying the portfolio with long-term earnings goals, Caterpillar is a fairly reliable option.
From the perspective of an individual investor, Caterpillar shares, being at the intersection of small returns and average risk, are not the most attractive option against the backdrop of a more actively growing market. On the other hand, the negative dynamics of macroeconomic indicators imply several strategies that, on the one hand, allow for avoiding a market bubble and losing savings, and on the other hand, can provide profitability in the current situation of uncertainty. Caterpillar is a long-term option as it is not in danger of a sharp fall in the context of sustained growth, strong financials, and federal investment. Buying these shares to receive income in the near future is associated with medium to high risk at the moment, as the potential for this growth may be exhausted soon due to the absence of factors driving the price upward.
The federal authorities of various countries have already published reports outlining budgets with the potential to conclude contracts, and the company itself has reported for the first quarter, announcing many innovative plans. Therefore, by adhering to the strategy of surviving the crisis associated with the critical rate and inflation growth, one can consider Caterpillar shares as an opportunity to preserve savings and almost certainly increase them over the next year and a half. If funds are needed immediately, it is worth considering other stocks in the market that show growth of almost 10% more than the daily returns of the company in question (Macroaxis, 2023a). Against the historically low P/E ratio, Caterpillar shares can be considered when their price falls. At low levels, the investment will be much more attractive in percentage terms, even in the short term.
In this case, a strategic asset allocation approach should be used, as with Caterpillar. However, subject to inevitable short-term volatility, it can provide profits with a greater probability in the long run. In part, here, we should utilize insured asset allocation in conjunction with investment goals that prioritize preserving savings against the backdrop of rising inflation. The investor must keep track of the current they are Caterpillar developments, evaluating them in terms of global demand: if Deere, with AI technology, against the backdrop of a growing world population, operates in an industry related in part to subsistence, then Caterpillar is more focused on resource extraction, which can be critical for several regions and infrastructures ( Long, 2023).
In Europe, energy is the most pressing issue, so the government’s budgetary plans for more mining contracts for energy, coupled with environmental considerations, could signal a rise in Caterpillar’s stock. At the same time, the United States, as an equally important player, where most of the company’s sales are located, should be assessed for the correlation of macroeconomic indicators with government goals (Caterpillar Inc., 2023). Given the long-term approach with low dynamics in the debt-to-equity ratio area, the use of tactical asset allocation or dynamic strategies in the context of Caterpillar looks unpromising. The company is currently in a local bull market, and growth is approaching a peak at a quarterly distance, which will inevitably lead to specific rollbacks of positions shortly.
Although the risks of such an outcome are small, and the investor is unlikely to lose much due to volatility, Caterpillar, due to the specifics of the industry and the company’s approach to financial changes, does not promise significant gains at this stage. Even with several external factors contributing to further growth, the company shows relatively low returns against the market background. Its results are impressive over several years, despite the decrease in dividends in 2013 (Long, 2023; Macroaxis, 2023a). As a result, strategic asset allocation is the most reasonable approach in terms of buying shares of this organization since a longer-term approach practically minimizes risks for at least the following year. When returning to growth dynamics, a new peak may reach indicators that can pay off such an expectation.
From a portfolio manager’s perspective, only Deere’s closest pursuer poses a threat to Caterpillar’s stock. In favor of the competitor, the fact that inventories at dealers are growing indicates a potential drop in sales next year (Woldemariam, 2023). However, final consumer demand remains high enough to understate the problem (Long, 2023).
The company’s P/E suggests that the stock is currently undervalued, despite these issues, even in the short term. Local problems with construction in some countries, such as China, may partly slow down sales; however, this market is far from the most profitable for Caterpillar. Against the backdrop of growing demand in Europe, this risk may turn out to be overestimated (Long, 2023). Therefore, the company can be considered for the portfolio as a reliable company along with an even more promising Deere. It is highly likely that when diversifying risk, the portfolio manager will choose to split investments in the industry between the two companies to mitigate potential risks.
Compared to other competitors, such as Hitachi or Komatsu, which are experiencing similar growth dynamics in a bull market, the risks associated with the market leaders listed above are likely to be less significant. In the long term, they are less volatile. Several advisers chose to sell the stock at the current moment of growth, which only pushed the price higher against the background of other factors (Macroaxis, 2023a). External determinants generally favor Caterpillar on a global scale, and the same can be said for Deere, whose P/E is even more underestimated than Caterpillar’s (Long, 2023; Macrotrends, 2023b). Portfolio-wise, Deere might be the choice, but the approach would involve a percentage split rather than a total cut of Caterpillar shares to diversify such risks.
Risk Analysis
The growth momentum in recent years, along with a low P/E ratio and relatively low EPS, creates a sense that Caterpillar, if it does experience a drop in shares, will likely be temporary and offset in the long term. Given the historical experience, such a scenario seems entirely plausible; however, the current external market changes, including the record-breaking macroeconomic dynamics of the US indicators over the past decades, create certain risks. Currently, Caterpillar shares continue to rise, but the factors driving growth are either at their peak or approaching it. If we consider macroeconomic determinants, two key indicators work in opposite directions to influence the potential change in a company’s share price.
Rising inflation is creating a favorable environment for investors in Caterpillar, as housing prices in the US market rose by 0.5%, an incentive for construction companies, which are likely to resort to buying Caterpillar Inc. equipment (Elazar, 2023). On the other hand, the US raises the critical rate, which creates a barrier to lending across all industries, potentially offsetting the stimulus, and as a result, sales may decline (Trading Economics, 2023). The critical rate can slow down inflation; however, if the first aspect is under the control of the state, then many other external factors influence the price growth, which forces the authorities to raise this indicator.
Therefore, specific risk involves a further increase in the critical rate, which brings several potential problems. Firstly, for the financial stability of Caterpillar itself, such an increase means an increase in liabilities on the balance sheet. While the company has solid headroom in both the short and long term, liquidity and solvency may be impacted by less attractive investment opportunities for investors.
Secondly, the main clients of the construction company will enter the market with high demand not so actively, and at the same time, for the end consumer, for example, a family looking for a new home, credit conditions will be difficult, and they may refuse to buy an apartment in a new house. In this case, market volatility will become a key indicator for both the industry and the exchange as a whole, which determines this risk as systematic. Neither Caterpillar nor the heavy equipment industry as a whole can control the growth of the critical rate; therefore, diversifying this problem will be challenging.
However, a critical assessment is that Caterpillar has a beta of 1.7, characterized by medium volatility compared to other companies. The risk factors identified by experts are primarily related to macroeconomics and politics, and in this regard, the company is significantly more dependent than the market (TipRanks, 2023). Consequently, the average volatility in this case will be fully reflected in the market movements.
Currently, the company is experiencing growth, as evident in Caterpillar’s share price; however, it is expected that, following another critical rate hike, the company’s volatility may decrease (Macroaxis, 2023b). Accordingly, this risk has non-systematic features because the company is more subject to changes than the market. At the same time, financial stability does not necessarily preclude future problems. An analysis of balance sheets and current sales growth suggests that Caterpillar does not face serious problems, at least in the near term.
This risk should be attributed to the market for the most part, since the independent features of exclusively internal processes do not create prerequisites for any problems. The company continues to innovate, adapting its models to meet the requirements of the environmental agenda and satisfying demand in the global market from a leadership position. However, certain corporate aspects are creating uncontrollable conditions, such as rising inflation, in the construction industry.
Accordingly, the long-term outlook, despite significant economic shocks, remains stable for Caterpillar. Significant income can only be obtained over a long period, and this is where the stock is expected to show growth, despite growing volatility (MarketWatch, 2023). The risk affects the company’s external environment to a moderate extent. On the one hand, indirect dependence on the increase in the critical rate has an adverse effect, which will also affect competitors. However, on the other hand, cheaper alternatives do not offer a similar level of quality. At the same time, the size of the crisis can directly affect Caterpillar’s choice by customers – the brand’s strength and experience justify the high cost of products. Still, with severe economic problems, there is a risk of new players appearing.
Market conditions will have a more significant impact on the company’s internal environment. With falling sales, Caterpillar will be forced to cut production and headcount, which has already occurred recently, as part of an optimization effort; accordingly, the infrastructure can be significantly streamlined under the influence of factors aimed at financial stability (Elazar, 2023). Processes are already undergoing constant changes due to the transition to alternative energy sources and the need to implement innovative products and approaches; therefore, the company’s experience in such conditions is significant and quite familiar, despite the uniqueness of the situation.
The risk can be effectively balanced by profit in case of significant returns; however, the heavy equipment industry is not very volatile, even in short periods. Therefore, the company should keep dividend growth as a competitive proposition for investors who diversify their portfolios for the long term. Potential negative market deviations can be insured by put options, which are gaining popularity in anticipation of a price decline after the current peak is passed (Macroaxis, 2023b).
While such potential performance in a historically low P/E environment in the short term may signal Caterpillar’s broad exposure to risk, experience shows that the expected price decline will attract more investment, supported by the industry’s long-term earnings. This scenario can be prevented by a prolonged macroeconomic crisis, characterized by an increase in the critical rate and a decline in inflation indicators, which are atypical for the market. In this case, the systematic risk will ultimately manifest itself: lending will be less accessible, which will reduce the purchasing power of customers, and price increases will not compensate for this, leaving the need to meet demand unaddressed.
Risk Management Analysis
The risk management strategy should be chosen based on the investor’s objectives. Suppose capital needs to be preserved and increased in a crisis. In that case, it is necessary to continue taking risks and maintaining existing shares of Caterpillar or diversifying the portfolio with these assets after a specific period has passed, once the peak has been reached. If one needs to act in the short term, the strategy of hedging and risk insurance through the purchase of options is best suited. The expected drop in Caterpillar shares on the market may happen quite soon, approximately in a quarterly perspective; however, reaching the lower limit may be an even more delayed process. Therefore, from a quarterly perspective, call options are recommended for buying, which provide an opportunity to win profits on an increase at any time.
Put options for hedging risks should be taken after a specific period, when it will be possible to assess the market’s further movement and Caterpillar’s current dynamics. If the stocks continue to rise shortly, the peak will depend on the ratio of inflation and the US key rate. The growth of the latter, accompanied by a slowdown in price growth, including in the real estate market, will be a signal to buy a put option to mitigate potential risk. Analyst consensus assumes a fall on a full-year perspective; therefore, the indicated systematic risk signals that the purchase of Caterpillar shares now can only be driven by the investor’s multi-year capital preservation goals (AlphaSpread, 2023). Risk insurance is the top priority option for strategy formation in this case.
At the same time, the conditions of uncertainty regarding the US economy remain. On the one hand, the escalation of relations with China suggests a relatively large number of factors that could negatively affect macroeconomic performance due to a decrease in the intensity of cooperation (Fajgelbaum & Khandelwal, 2022). On the other hand, funding for local production may be activated in this way, which is a positive sign for Caterpillar, which depends to a certain extent on government contracts.
At the same time, the US budget is now actively used for military purposes in the Eastern European conflict, which leads to an increase in public debt and the need to raise the critical rate (Kelin & Obstfeld, 2023). Therefore, to optimize the risk management strategy, it is necessary to focus on US policy, the dynamics of macroeconomic indicators, the movement of the real estate market, and the energy and mining industries, where Caterpillar products are most in demand, given that most of the company’s revenue comes from this region.
Profit maximization at the moment involves using call options to insure the investor from the potential proximity of the peak. Put options, in this case, appear to be a strategy of minimizing losses rather than generating a profit, and the market movement upward is still not over. With a volatility of 1.7, Caterpillar shares are likely to continue rising for some time.
The inflation indicator will be the most understandable and easily monitored benchmark, as long as vital rate growth does not slow down price growth in the energy and construction industries. Caterpillar will then be able to increase profits, experience strong demand, and mitigate potential downward deviations. However, if inflation begins to decline after the state’s measures, this fact will become a signal to buy put options, despite the goal of profit maximization, as the decline may be prolonged in the future.
In the long term, experts still agree that Caterpillar shares, even at the current moment of approaching the peak, along with the market, are an excellent solution for portfolio diversification. Options have a fixed expiration date and can be problematic if the stock price increases over time. In general, the assets of companies in this industry do not look attractive for achieving profits in the short term – they have low volatility but also low returns: rounding up, 85% of companies in the market give more daily income, but the exact number tends to deviate from the market more than Caterpillar (Macroaxis, 2023b).
Suppose the investor’s goal is to survive the crisis without tying savings to the potential duration of economic trouble. In that case, buying becomes a risk-taking strategy and will be the most reliable solution. If the investor’s funds are to be more flexible, then put or call options, depending on external factors, will become a hedging strategy and insurance against potential deviations over a shorter distance.
Feasibility
Table 1 calculates five critical financial ratios to measure the performance of Caterpillar, its four competitors, and the average of these five part-industry companies. These calculations indicate that Caterpillar has a significantly leveraged capital structure, which deviates from the industry average, but not substantially from its nearest competitor, Deere.
Similar dynamics are in the value of solvency through the debt-to-assets relationship, which is regulated for the same reason. Additionally, the company has slightly lower liquidity, as indicated by the current ratio, and a problem with inventory turnover is also revealed. At the same time, in terms of profitability, Caterpillar is second only to Deere, while the activities of other competitors are more diversified, resulting in higher operating and gross expenses, which reduces this net profit ratio.
Regarding divergence, Caterpillar underperforms the market due to its capital structure. In general, a similar practice is typical among other industry representatives, who are less diversified than Hitachi and Volvo. However, with the recent growth in sales, lending to the company has also become more active. Against the backdrop of the growth in the critical rate, this fact can be viewed as a negative signal to investors, leading to increased dependence on banks and interest payments.
However, Caterpillar’s stock is high enough to build capital at a similar pace for at least the next year or two. On the one hand, the prevalence of equity enables an organization to be more financially stable. Still, it also increases the power of shareholders, thereby creating less room for maneuvering when building plans for large projects. Accordingly, the dynamics are currently primarily driven by negative external macroeconomic factors, but may be offset by future sales growth. However, if the crisis in the US persists for an extended period, Caterpillar’s investment attractiveness will decrease, particularly in comparison to its competitor, Deere.
Deere and Komatsu have significantly better liquidity, which is not caused by excess inventories in current assets, especially in the case of Deere. The increase in unsold inventory is Caterpillar’s current problem, and the quality of the solution will be visible in the upcoming quarterly and financial reports. Relative to the industry, Caterpillar is at the same level. However, more diversified companies have a lower current ratio. Therefore, from an investor’s point of view, it is not so much solvency and leverage that will become the critical values for support in choosing the direction of investments, but the manifestation of systemic risk concerning Caterpillar’s liquidity. If a company fails to grow current assets while actively lending at a high key rate, then the impact of risk will increase, and any gains will only be expected in the long term.
The problem of product turnover concerns not only Caterpillar but also companies like Komatsu. These companies globally face the same factors. However, the influence of US macroeconomics is most pronounced for Caterpillar. However, prerequisites for a protracted downward trend are not yet expected – the organization demonstrates the best net profit ratio after Deere in the industry. The optimization of operational processes, despite the challenges posed by the outside world, is at a high level. Only a significant drop in sales can push Caterpillar into the category of companies unsuitable for investment at this time.
Caterpillar should closely monitor its capital structure, particularly its current liabilities, as liquidity will be the primary signal for investors in the short term. At the same time, despite the downward historical dynamics, the current ratio of current assets to liabilities is not a weak point of the company, as the indicator remains above one, indicating a stable and reliable position of the organization in isolation. Against the backdrop of capital structure, leverage, and debt-to-asset ratio, this only creates conditions for potential risk, which may increase due to US macroeconomic indicators. At the same time, another factor contributing to Caterpillar’s profitability is its robust financial strength, which enables it to mitigate problems in the worst-case scenario for an extended period. With a responsible approach to minimizing risks through insurance or hedging by buying options, the company’s investment attractiveness is still high.
It is rather difficult to assess the long-term impact of the crisis on inflation and the key rate since the totality of these factors is much more complex. In the worst-case scenario, the critical rate will continue to grow until inflation returns to its previous level. It will then decrease, and as a result, the company’s liquidity and sales may drop significantly, along with its potential share price on the stock exchange. Even at this point, expert consensus is converging on the valuation of Caterpillar shares.
However, the portfolio diversification with these assets, as a rule, is carried out with long-term plans in which the company does not yet have prerequisites for a significant drop. Despite various problems, Caterpillar annually raises dividends; the P/E ratio is far from the historical maximum. Therefore, there is considerable potential for long-term growth. As a result, despite all the potential drawbacks, Caterpillar shares are worth buying to protect an investor’s savings for the coming years; however, options should be used for short-term speculation to protect the investor from significant losses.
Conclusion
Caterpillar is an industry leader with solid financials, asset safety, and growing sales. In addition, the organization operates in the critical infrastructure and constantly offers new innovative models and solutions. Stocks should be purchased to diversify the portfolio in the long term, given the current low P/E ratio and the exchange’s historical performance. Options should be used for short-term profit to hedge against the critical systemic risk of the growth of the key rate in the US.
Against the background of competitors, Caterpillar outperforms most other companies whose activities are more diversified, but is noticeably inferior to Deere. The closest competitor has better financial ratios, even higher P/E upside, and a host of developments, such as artificial intelligence, that promise more considerable sales growth in the future. Therefore, investors should proceed from the objectives, and the main recommendation will be to buy shares of Deere and Caterpillar together to diversify their portfolio and minimize long-term risks. In the short term, it is recommended to take call options shortly, as the Caterpillar peak has not yet been passed. After it passes, consider implementing options.
References
AlphaSpread. (2023). Caterpillar Inc.
Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Dolgui, A., Franchini, G., Ivanov, D., & Nair, A. (2022). The Impacts of digital technologies on coping with the COVID-19 pandemic in the manufacturing industry: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 1-24.
Caterpillar Inc. (2021). Caterpillar Launching New Technology and Equipment at MINExpo 2021. OEM Off-Highway.
Catrerpillar Inc. (2023). 2022 Segment Highlights.
Elazar, K. (2023). Caterpillar: still a buy, despite higher short-term risks. Seeking Alpha.
Fajgelbaum, P. D., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2022). The economic impacts of the US–China trade war. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 205-228.
Klein, M. & Obstfeld, M. (2023). Why the U.S. national debt will likely keep growing. Tufts Now.
Lim, W. M., Chin, M. W. C., Ee, Y. S., Fung, C. Y., Giang, C. S., Heng, K. S. & Weissmann, M. A. (2022). What is at stake in a war? A prospective evaluation of the Ukraine and Russia conflict for business and society. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(6), 23-36.
Long, J. (2023). John Deere & Caterpillar: two companies with solid potential. Fast Graphs.
Macroaxis. (2023a). Caterpillar stock performance.
Macroaxis. (2023b). Caterpillar stock volatility.
Macrotrends. (2023a). Caterpillar Market Cap 2010-2023 | CAT.
Macrotrends. (2023b). Deere Market Cap 2010-2023 | DE.
Macrotrends. (2023c). Hitachi Market Cap 2010-2022 | HTHIY.
Macrotrends. (2023d). AB Volvo Market Cap 2016-2023 | VLVLY.
MarketWatch. (2023). Caterpillar Inc.
Nathaniel, S. P., Murshed, M., & Bassim, M. (2021). The nexus between economic growth, energy use, international trade and ecological footprints: the role of environmental regulations in N11 countries. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(6), 496-512.
TipRanks. (2023). Caterpillar (CAT) Risk Factors.
Trading Economics. (2023). United States Fed Funds Rate.
Woldemariam, D. (2023). Caterpillar earnings: demand still looks solid, despite flattening dealer inventories in 2023. Morningstar.