Every day presents both opportunities and challenges in the business environment which necessitate critical evaluation to enable one come up with possible solutions to combat them. The construction of a relevant argument is hence of essence since it enables the business’ management to arrive at amicable solution to the issue at hand. For these arguments to be formulated adequately, serious deliberations and critical evaluation are deemed necessary (Miller, 2007). This paper hence explores the various avenues of arriving at constructive arguments with solid supportive backgrounds.
The mode of communication in business environments always depend on the intension of the message or information to be delivered. If the information was intended to set in motion or rather initiate some action among the members of staff for example, the mode of communication would in this case involve a relentless expression of the required expectations and motivation of the parties involved to see to it that the take-off of a certain project is done adequately.
If the intent of a particular mode of communication was to put across a certain message to the concerned party, it would be quite imperative to ensure that the information is delivered as required (Finnegan, 2002). In a business environment for instance, this mode would ensure that decision making among employees is adequately informed so as to create a situation where understanding and general awareness are arrived at.
Another important aspect that ought to be put into consideration before settling on a certain mode of communication is the establishment and maintenance of relations both with a firm’s employees and other business associates (Miller, 2007). This is a very important consideration since it greatly determines the prosperity and growth levels of a business organization. As better interactive skills are employed in creating relations, productivity is highly enhanced.
Critical evaluation of information sources so as to verify their credibility is also quite important since it enhances the accuracy of inferences made on the issues in question. Key areas to focus on while evaluating information sources include the authority held by the author and even publisher of the document in question to speak or rather write on the subject matter (walton, 2006). This is very important since the credentials and interests of the authors would adequately speak volumes on the kind of content in question.
The quality of work and its coverage would also come in quite handy in establishing weather an information source is credible or not. Failure to mention the fact that the currency of the said document is of great importance would be quite an oversight. With respect to the fact that times are changing, the reliability of a set of data highly depends on how recent the data or information source is (walton, 2006).
In retrospect, these findings make much sense since if adequately improvised; a general turn-around in a company’s fortune is quite imminent and should hence be encouraged among business administrators.
The presentation of effective arguments may vary from one environment to another since the gravity held by these arguments may differ. A classroom argument for instance would differ from that held in daily life since it is intended to drive a certain distinct point home. Arguments held in daily life may not have a specific agenda and hence would lack the zeal to adequately insist on the position taken (Stone, 2007).
In a job scenario, the presentation of arguments would also differ greatly from those in the other cases since the arguments are adequately informed. This is occasioned by vast research and deliberations often carried out before the presentation of these arguments.
In conclusion, it is however quit evident that the success of any business venture majorly depends on the aspects mentioned in this essay which include effective communication methods and skills, a critical evaluation of a firm’s sources of information and an effective presentation of arguments to the destined audience.
References
Finnegan, H. R (2002). Communicating: the multiple modes of human interconnection. New York: Routledge Inc.
Miller, J. B. (2007). Organizational behavior: From theory to practice. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Stone, A. M. & John Desmond. (2007). Fundamentals of Markets: A Critical Evaluation. New York: Routledge Inc.
Walton, N. D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.