Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies Essay

Exclusively available on Available only on IvyPanda®
This academic paper example has been carefully picked, checked and refined by our editorial team.
You are free to use it for the following purposes:
  • To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
  • As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
  • As a template for you assignment

Chick-fil-A and Walmart are among the largest companies in their respective fields — fast food restaurants and retail. Both have been involved in significant controversies regarding their operation. In Chick-fil-A’s case, such a controversy happened around 2012, following the company CEO Dan Cathy’s statements about same-sex marriage and donations to charities opposing lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual (LGBT) groups. Walmart has been criticized for poor working conditions and low wages. Both of these situations, though exemplified by specific organizations, are sufficiently general and applicable in most businesses.

Chick-fil-A

Chick-fil-A’s issue is the public relations impact made by the CEO’s statements. The company, according to his statement, “operat[es] … according to Biblical principles” (Atlanta Business Chronicle, 2012.). As a consequence of these principles, he donated to various charitable organizations that espouse similar ideals, which often oppose LGBT interests. Furthermore, he made a personal statement about his belief in traditional marriage, prompting a resonant response, which culminated in boycotts of Chick-fil-A restaurants.

This matter represents a complicated public relations (PR) challenge, as same-sex marriage was a polarizing issue at the time. From the macroeconomic standpoint, Chick-a-Fil-A might need to reevaluate its strategy given the current political environment. As McCarthy (2019) reports, the support for gay marriage in the US is stable: as many as 63% of citizens show acceptance for marriage equality. Given that this many people back up the new policy, Chick-a-Fil-a puts itself at risk of ruining its reputation on the grounds of ethical issues.

From the microeconomic standpoint, Chick-a-Fil-a might be losing customers who belong to the LGBT community. One way to estimate the impact is to calculate the approximate percentage of affected population (LGBT people) in states with the most restaurants. For instance, according to the 2010 census, the state of Georgia’s population was 9,687,653, of which 21,318 couples, or 0.44% were in same-sex relationships (U. S. Census Bureau, 2010; Gates & Cooke, 2012). This is a rough estimate that only accounts basic statistics (e. g. not all LGBT people are in same-sex relationships, non-LGBT customers can be negatively effected by the controversy) and one state. However, it provides a starting point for further research into the subject and a thesis that no changes are necessary.

Walmart

Walmart is a major retail chain that is often criticized for poor working conditions and low wages. This is harmful to the organization because it reduces employee loyalty and engagement, but “engaged workers are more productive [and] provide better service” (Ton, 2017, para. 2). From the macroeconomic standpoint, Walmart is putting itself at risk of losing employees during the time when work mobility is normalized and encouraged. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018), an average workers changes from ten to 15 jobs during their lifetime. If previously, individuals tended to choose a job for a long term, today, it is not uncommon to switch rapidly if a person’s expectations are not met. In this case, Walmart might want to reconsider how it treats its employees and work on a feasible retainment strategy.

From the microeconomic standpoint, by neglecting its employees, Walmart might ruin its reputation among customers. Accenture (2018) reports that customers have found their voice and they do not hesitate to express their disagreement. According to the statistics collected by the bureau, 55% of customers are ready to complain if they are not happy with a company’s words or actions. 37% will refuse to use products or services on the ethical grounds. It is readily imaginable how Walmart may repel consumers if it does not rectify its image.

Conclusion

The controversies the two companies faced, and continue to face, fall within two different areas: PR, and internal structure and management. In the case of Chick-fil-A, a controversial personal stance is affecting the firm’s public standing, and the percentage of population affected by this needs to be assessed to determine the necessity of changing it. For Walmart’s wage and working conditions problem, a direct solution is impossible. However, internal research can guide strategic changes that will allow to increase employees’ efficiency and, therefore, either increase the profit margin, or make some workers redundant, allowing to improve the wages and conditions.

References

Accenture. (2018). From me to we: The rise of the purpose-led brand. Web.

Chick-fil-A defends its values. (2011) Atlanta Business Chronicle. Web.

Gates, G. J., & Cooke, A. M. Georgia Census Snapshot: 2010. Web.

McCarthy, J. (2019). . Web.

Ton, Z. (2017). The case for good jobs. Harvard Business Review. Web.

U.S. Bureau of Statistics. (2018). . Web.

U. S. Census Bureau. 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Web.

More related papers Related Essay Examples
Cite This paper
You're welcome to use this sample in your assignment. Be sure to cite it correctly

Reference

IvyPanda. (2022, February 8). Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies. https://ivypanda.com/essays/chick-fil-a-and-walmart-controversies/

Work Cited

"Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies." IvyPanda, 8 Feb. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/chick-fil-a-and-walmart-controversies/.

References

IvyPanda. (2022) 'Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies'. 8 February.

References

IvyPanda. 2022. "Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies." February 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/chick-fil-a-and-walmart-controversies/.

1. IvyPanda. "Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies." February 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/chick-fil-a-and-walmart-controversies/.


Bibliography


IvyPanda. "Chick-fil-A and Walmart Controversies." February 8, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/chick-fil-a-and-walmart-controversies/.

If, for any reason, you believe that this content should not be published on our website, please request its removal.
Updated:
Privacy Settings

IvyPanda uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance your experience, enabling functionalities such as:

  • Basic site functions
  • Ensuring secure, safe transactions
  • Secure account login
  • Remembering account, browser, and regional preferences
  • Remembering privacy and security settings
  • Analyzing site traffic and usage
  • Personalized search, content, and recommendations
  • Displaying relevant, targeted ads on and off IvyPanda

Please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy for detailed information.

Required Cookies & Technologies
Always active

Certain technologies we use are essential for critical functions such as security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and ensuring the site operates correctly for browsing and transactions.

Site Customization

Cookies and similar technologies are used to enhance your experience by:

  • Remembering general and regional preferences
  • Personalizing content, search, recommendations, and offers

Some functions, such as personalized recommendations, account preferences, or localization, may not work correctly without these technologies. For more details, please refer to IvyPanda's Cookies Policy.

Personalized Advertising

To enable personalized advertising (such as interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. These partners may have their own information collected about you. Turning off the personalized advertising setting won't stop you from seeing IvyPanda ads, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Personalized advertising may be considered a "sale" or "sharing" of the information under California and other state privacy laws, and you may have the right to opt out. Turning off personalized advertising allows you to exercise your right to opt out. Learn more in IvyPanda's Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.

1 / 1